Abstract
The highly fragmented landscape structures of coastal salinas are known to result in decreased terrestrial bird abundance, species richness and diversity but to promote original assemblages dominated by specialist species, such as the Bluethroat Luscinia svecica namnetum. This species is mainly found at the core of these salinas, where the landscape characteristics are a priori the most hostile for terrestrial birds. The aim of this study was to test whether individuals of a specialized species like the Bluethroat may offset such landscape constraints by expanding their home ranges. We therefore radio-tracked 21 males in 2013 and 2014 in the salinas of the Marais du Mès (Parc Naturel Régional de Brière, Western France). The data of the 18 best-monitored males were used to carry out a hierarchical partitioning of variance to test the relative influence of landscape characteristics, individual characteristics and distance to other males on their home-range sizes. We found that landscape characteristics were the factors that best explained home range sizes. Home-range sizes were significantly smaller in diversified landscapes composed of tidal creeks and salt-marsh patches and tended to be larger in landscapes dominated by the aquatic matrix consisting of water ponds. The results of this study demonstrate that although a few bird species are able to select a priori hostile landscapes, they can offset such constraints by expanding their home-range size.
Zusammenfassung
Blaukehlchen Luscinia svecica namnetum gleichen Einschränkungen im Lebensraum mit einer Erweiterung ihres Aktionsraumes aus
Es ist bekannt, dass die stark fragmentierten Landschaftsstrukturen von küstennahen Salzmarschen Häufigkeit, Artenreichtum und Vielfalt von terrestrischen Vögeln verringert, aber Gemeinschaften begünstigen, die von Spezialisten wie dem Blaukehlchen Luscinia svecica namnetum dominiert werden. Diese Art ist daher hauptsächlich im Zentrum von Salzmarschen zu finden, wo die Landschaftsstrukturen für terrestrische Vögel am widrigsten sind. Ziel dieser Studie war es zu testen, ob Individuen dieser Art die Einschränkungen ihres Lebensraumes durch eine Erweiterung ihres Aktionsraumes ausgleichen. 21 Männchen wurden in 2013 und 2014 in den Salzmarschen des Marais du Mès (Parc Naturel Régional de Brière, Westfrankreich) radio-telemetriert. Die Daten der 18 best-verfolgten Individuen wurden genutzt um in einer hierarchischen Teilung der Varianz den relativen Einfluss von (i) Landschaftsstruktur (ii) Individuellen Unterschieden, sowie (iii) Abstand zu andern Männchen, auf die Größe ihres Aktionsraums. Landschaftsstruktur war dabei der Faktor, der die Größe des Aktionsraumes am besten erklärte. Aktionsräume waren signifikant kleiner in vielfältigeren Lebensräumen mit Prielen und Salzwiesen und größer in Lebensräumen mit einer aquatischen Grundsubstanz bestehend aus Teichen. Diese Studie zeigt, dass obwohl nur wenige Vogelarten fähig sind in grundsätzlich widrigen Lebensräumen zu siedeln, jene Arten die Einschränkungen durch eine Ausweitung ihres Aktionsraumes wieder ausgleichen können.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anich NM, Benson TJ, Bednarz JC (2009) Estimating territory and home range size: do singing locations alone provide an accurate estimate of space use? Auk 126:626–634
Arizaga J, Andueza M, Tamayo I (2013) Spatial behaviour and habitat use of first-year Bluethroats Luscinia svecica stopping over at costal marshes during the autumn migration period. Acta Ornithol 48:17–25
Bonnet P (1984) Les passereaux marqueurs d’anthropisation dans un marais salant de l’ouest de la France (Guérande). PhD thesis. University of Rennes I, Rennes
Burt WH (1943) Territoriality and home range concepts as applied to mammals. J Mamm 24:346–352
Caccamise DF, Hedin RS (1985) An aerodynamic basis for selecting transmitter loads in birds. Wilson Bull 97:306–318
Calange C (2006) The package adehabitat for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat used by animals. Ecol Model 197:516–519
Cederlund G, Sand H (1994) Home range size in relation to age and sex in moose. J Mamm 75:1005–1012
Chevan A, Sutherland M (1991) Hierarchical partitioning. Am Stat 45:90–96
Dominik C, Ménanteau L, Chadenas C, Godet L (2012) The influence of salina landscape structures on terrestrial bird distribution in the Guérande basin (Northwestern France). Bird Study 59:483–495
Eybert MC, Constant P, Allano L (1989) Premières données sur le territorialisme hivernal observé chez la Gorgebleue (Luscinia svecica L.). CR Acad Sci III-Vie 309:243–249
Fournier J, Godet L, Grégoire E, Marquet M, Eybert MC (2013) Radiopistage sur la Gorgebleue à miroir Luscinia svecica namnetum: une technique robuste et fiable pour la pose d’émetteurs. Alauda 81:139–142
Fretwell SD, Lucas HL Jr (1970) On territorial behaviour and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds. Acta Biotheor 19:16–36
Geslin T, Lefeuvre JC, Le Pajolec Y, Questiau S, Eybert MC (2002) Salt exploitation and landscape structure in a breeding population of the threatened bluethroat (Luscinia svecica) in saltpans in western France. Biol Conserv 107:283–289
Geslin T, Chastel O, Eybert MC (2004) Sex-specific patterns in body condition and testosterone level changes in a territorial migratory bird: the Bluethroat Luscinia svecica. Ibis 146:632–641
Griesser M, Schneider NA, Collis MA, Overs A, Guppy M, Guppy S, Takeuchi N, Collins P, Peters A, Hall ML (2012) Causes of ring-related injuries in birds––evidence and recommendations from four field studies. PLoS ONE 7(e51891):1–11
Harestad AS, Bunnell FL (1979) Home range and body weight—a reevaluation. Ecology 60:389–402
Johnsen A, Lifjeld JT (1995) Unattractive males guard their mates more closely: an experiment with Bluethroats (Aves, Turdidae: Luscinia S. svecica). Ethology 101:200–212
Kjellander P, Hewison AJM, Liberg O, Angibault JM, Bideau E, Cargnelutti B (2004) Experimental evidence for density-dependence of home-range size in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.): comparison of two long-term studies. Oecologia 139:478–485
Krokene C, Anthonisen K, Lifjeld JT, Amundsen T (1996) Paternity and paternity assurance in the Bluethroat Luscinia s. svecica. Anim Behav 52:405–417
Mac Nally R (2000) Regression and model building in conservation biology, biogeography and ecology: the distinction between and reconciliation of ‘predictive’ and ‘explanatory’ models. Biodiv Cons 9:655–671
McNab BK (1963) Bioenergetics and the determination of home range size. Am Nat 47:133–140
Mohr CO (1947) Table of equivalent populations of North American small mammals. Am Midl Nat 37:223–249
Noble GK (1939) The role of dominance in the life of birds. Auk 56:253–273
Questiau S, Eybert MC, Taberlet P (1999) Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers reveal extra-pair parentage in a bird species: the Bluethroat (Luscinia svecica). Mol Ecol 8:1331–1339
R Development Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna. Available at: http://www.R-project.org
Schulze A (2004) Les oiseaux d’Europe, d’Afrique du Nord et d’Asie occidentale. Musikverlag Edition AMPLE
Seaman DE, Millspaugh JJ, Kernohan BJ, Brundige GC, Raedeke KJ, Gitzen RA (1999) Effects of sample size on kernel home range estimates. J Wildlife Manag 63:739–747
Sergio F, Blas J, Hiraldo F (2009) Predictors of floater status in a long-lived bird: a cross-sectional and longitudinal test of hypotheses. J Anim Ecol 78:109–118
Shannon C (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27:379–423
Smiseth T, Amundsen T (1995) Female Bluethroats (Luscinia s. svecica) regularly visit territories of extrapair males before egg laying. Auk 112:1049–1053
Swihart RK, Slade NA, Bergstrom BJ (1988) Relating body size to the rate of home range size use in mammals. Ecology 69:393–399
Taillandier J, Bonnet P, Constant P, Eybert MC, Daval I (1985) Contribution à l’étude écologique des passereaux dans les marais salants de Guérande (Loire Atlantique). Oiseau RFO 55:205–234
Walsh CJ, Papas PJ, Crowther D, Sim PT, Yoo J (2004) Stormwater drainage pipes as a threat to a stream-dwelling amphipod of conservation significance, Austrogammarus australis, in southeastern Australia. Biodiv Cons 13:781–793
White G, Garott R (1990) Analysis of wildlife radio-tracking data. Academic Press, New York
Worton BJ (1987) A review of models of home range for animal movement. Ecol Model 38:277–298
Zink RM, Drovetski SV, Questiau S, Fadeev I, Nesterov EV, Westberg MC, Rohwer S (2003) Recent evolutionary history of the Bluethroat (Luscinia svecica) across Eurasia. Mol Ecol 12:3069–3075
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the Parc Naturel Régional de Brière and the Centre de Recherche sur la Biologie des Populations d’Oiseaux (CRBPO) of the French National Museum of Natural History. The authors thank all of the salt-workers of the site for making them welcome during the field surveys.
Ethical approval
All applicable national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All procedures in this study were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the Centre de Recherche sur la Biologie des Populations d’Oiseaux (CRBPO) of the French Museum of Natural History.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by T. Gottschalk.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Godet, L., Marquet, M., Eybert, MC. et al. Bluethroats Luscinia svecica namnetum offset landscape constraints by expanding their home range. J Ornithol 156, 591–600 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-015-1172-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-015-1172-y