Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spatial patterns in the use of foraging areas and its relationship with prey resources in the threatened Olrog’s Gull (Larus atlanticus)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Ornithology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Olrog’s Gull Larus atlanticus is a threatened species which feeds during the breeding season almost exclusively on crabs. We studied the use of foraging areas and its relationship with prey resources in Olrog’s Gulls breeding at Bahía San Blas, Argentina. Feeding areas were identified by radio-tracking 10 and 12 birds in 2006 and 2007, respectively (458 and 574 foraging trips, respectively) and monitoring 120 color-marked individuals during 2007 (3,447 locations). Feeding habitats were classified using dominant substrate and structural characteristics, and prey availability was assessed by sampling 2,220 1-m2 quadrates distributed throughout gull potential feeding areas. Both telemetry and monitoring of marked individuals indicated that gulls used 20 km of coastline but foraged mainly in three sectors located between 1.5 and 7 km north of the colony. During both years, the use of feeding areas varied throughout the breeding cycle, with a higher use of areas closer to the colony during the chick stage. Results showed a differential distribution of crab species depending on habitat type, with a dominance of Cyrtograpsus altimanus in structured environments and Neohelice granulata in muddy substrates with vegetation. During incubation, gulls mostly used areas characterized by high densities of N. granulata, while during the early chick stage they mostly used sectors with high densities of C. altimanus. Prey size varied among crab species, C. altimanus being significantly smaller. Changes in Olrog’s Gull use of coastal areas appear to be determined by the seasonal change in trophic requirements of adults and chicks, given the spatial segregation of their prey in relation to habitat characteristics.

Zusammenfassung

Räumliche Muster in der Nutzung von Nahrungsgebieten und ihre Abhängigkeit vom Nahrungsangebot bei der gefährdeten Olrogmöve ( Larus atlanticus )

Die Olrogmöwe Larus atlanticus ist eine gefährdete Art, die während der Brutzeit nahezu ausschließlich Krabben frisst. Wir untersuchten die Nutzung von Nahrungsgebieten und ihre Abhängigkeit vom Nahrungsangebot bei in Bahía San Blas, Argentinien, brütenden Olrogmöwen. Die Nahrungsgebiete wurden mittels Radiotelemetrie bei 10 (2006) bzw. 12 (2007) Vögeln mit insgesamt 458 bzw. 574 Nahrungsflügen ermittelt. Zudem wurden 2007 120 farbberingte Vögel mit insgesamt 3,447 Beobachtungen einbezogen. Die Nahrungshabitate wurden über das dominante Substart sowie strukturelle Eigenschaften klassifiziert. Die Verfügbarkeit von Nahrung wurde in 2,220 einen Quadratmeter großen Probeflächen, die über die potenziellen Nahrungsflächen verteilt waren, ermittelt. Telemetrie wie Sichtbeobachtungen zeigten, dass die Möwen 20 km Küstenlinie nutzten, aber im Wesentlichen nur in drei Gebieten, die zwischen 1,5 und 7 km nördlich der Kolonie lagen, Nahrung suchten. In beiden Jahren variierte die Nutzung der Jagdgebiete im Verlauf des Brutzyklus mit intensiverer Nutzung der näher gelegenen Gebiete während der Jungenaufzucht. Die Ergebnisse zeigten eine differentielle Nutzung der Krabben in Abhängigkeit vom Lebensraum mit einer Dominanz von Cyrtograpsus altimanus in strukturierten Gebieten und von Neohelice granulata in mehr schlickigen Gebieten mit Vegetation. Während der Bebrütungsphase nutzen die Möwen vor allem Gebiete, die durch ein dichtes Vorkommen von N. granulata bestimmt waren, wogegen sie zur Aufzuchtszeit vornehmlich Flächen mit hohen Dichten von C. altimanus nutzten. Die Größe der Nahrung variierte zwischen den Krabbenarten mit signifikant geringerer Größe von C. altimanus. Die Änderungen der Nutzung von Küstengebieten durch die Olrogmöwe scheint also vom saisonalen Nahrungsbedarf für die Altvögel und die Küken und der räumlichen Verteilung der Nahrung bestimmt zu sein.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Belant JL, Seamans TW (1993) Evaluation of dyes and techniques to color-mark incubating herring gulls. J Field Ornithol 64:440–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Berón MP, Favero M, Gómez Laich A (2007) Use of natural and anthropogenic resources by the Olrog’s Gull Larus atlanticus: implications for the conservation of the species in non-breeding habitats. Bird Conserv Int 17:351–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertellotti M, Pagnoni G, Yorio P (2003) Comportamiento de alimentación de la Gaviota Cocinera durante la temporada no reproductiva en playas arenosas de Península Valdés, Argentina. Hornero 18:37–42

    Google Scholar 

  • BirdLife International (2008) Species fact sheet: Larus atlanticus [Internet]. Birdlife International, Cambridge. http://www.birdlife.org. Accessed 20 Feb 2011

  • Boersma PD, Rebstock GA (2009) Foraging distance affects reproductive success in Magellanic penguins. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 375:263–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger J, Galli A (1987) Factors affecting distribution of gulls (Larus spp.) on two New Jersey coastal bays. Environ Conserv 14:59–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger J, Gochfeld M (1996) Family Laridae (Gulls). In: del Hoyo J, Elliot A, Sargatal J (eds) Handbook of the birds of the world, vol 3 (Hoatzin to Auks). Lynx, Barcelona, pp 572–623

  • Cairns DK (1989) The regulation of seabird colony size: a hinterland model. Am Nat 134:141–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase MK (2002) Nest site selection and nest success in a song sparrow population: the significance of spatial variation. Condor 104:103–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell MA, Landrum SL (1993) Nonrandom shorebird distribution and fine-scale variation in prey abundance. Condor 95:94–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Copello S, Favero M (2001) Foraging ecology of Olrog’s Gull Larus atlanticus in Mar Chiquita Lagoon (Buenos Aires, Argentina): are there age-related differences? Bird Conserv Int 11:175–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelius C, Navarrete SA, Marquet PA (2001) Effects of human activity on the structure of coastal bird assemblages in Central Chile. Conserv Biol 15:1396–1404

    Google Scholar 

  • Danufsky T, Colwell MA (2003) Winter communities and tidal flat characteristics at Humboldt Bay, California. Condor 105:117–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Delhey JKV, Carrete M, Martínez M (2001) Diet and feeding behaviour of Olrog’s gull Larus atlanticus in Bahía Blanca, Argentina. Ardea 89:319–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Escapa M, Isacch JP, Daleo P, Alberti J, Iribarne O, Borges M, Dos Santos EP, Gagliardini DA, Lasta M (2004) The distribution and ecological effects of the introduced Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg, 1793) in northern Patagonia. J Shellfish Res 23:765–772

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick S, Bouchez B (1998) Effects of recreational disturbance on the foraging behaviours of waders on a rocky beach. Bird Study 45:157–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatto A, Quintana F, Yorio P (2008) Feeding behavior and habitat use in a waterbird assemblage at a marine wetland in coastal Patagonia, Argentina. Waterbirds 31:463–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorke M, Brandl R (1986) How to live in colonies: spatial foraging strategies of the black-headed gull. Oecologia 70:288–290

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goss-Custard D (1970) The responses of Redshank (Tringa totanus (L.)) to spatial variations in the density of their prey. J Anim Ecol 39:91–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera G, Punta G, Yorio P (2005) Diet specialization of the threatened Olrog’s gull Larus atlanticus during the breeding season at Golfo San Jorge, Argentina. Bird Conserv Int 15:89–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooge PN, Eichenlaub W, Solomon E (1999) The animal movement program. US geological survey. Alaska Biological Science Center, Anchorage, AK

    Google Scholar 

  • Huin N (2002) Foraging distribution of the black-browed albatross, Thalassarche melanophris, breeding in the Falkland Islands. Aquat Conserv 12:89–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Iribarne O, Martinetto P, Schwindt E, Botto F, Bortolus A, Garcia Borboroglu P (2003) Evidences of habitat displacement between two common soft-bottom SW Atlantic intertidal crabs. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 296:167–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Isacch JP, Pérez CF, Iribarne O (2006) Bird species composition and diversity at middle Argentinean coast of La Plata river. Ornitol Neotrop 17:419–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold MF, Swennen C, Bruijn LLM (1989) Experiments of selection of feeding site and food size in oystercatchers, Haematopus ostralegus, of different social status. Neth J Sea Res 23:333–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis S, Sherratt TN, Hamer KC, Wanless S (2001) Evidence of intraspecific competition for food in a pelagic seabird. Nature 412:816–819

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orensanz JM, Schwindt E, Pastorino G, Bortolus A, Casas G, Darrigran G, Elías R, López Gappa JJ, Obenat S, Pascual M, Penchaszadeh P, Piriz ML, Scarabino F, Spivak ED, Vallarino EA (2002) No longer a pristine confine of the world ocean: a survey of exotic marine species in the Southwestern Atlantic. Biol Invasions 4:115–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedrocchi V, Oro D, González-Solís J (1996) Differences between diet of adult and chick Audouin’s gulls Larus audouinii at the Chafarinas Islands, SW Mediterranean. Ornis Fenn 73:124–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Petracci PF, Sotelo MR, Díaz LI (2008) A new colony of Olrog’s Gull (Larus atlanticus) in the Bahía Blanca, Bahía Falsa and Bahía Verde Natural Reserve, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Hornero 23:37–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierotti R, Annett CA (1991) Diet choice in the herring gull: constraints imposed by reproductive and ecological factors. Ecology 72:319–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Puttick GM (1984) Foraging and activity patterns in wintering shorebirds. In: Burger J, Olla BL (eds) Behavior of marine animals: shorebird migration and foraging behavior. Plenum, New York, pp 203–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos R, Ramírez F, Santera C, Jover L, Ruiz X (2009) Diet of yellow-legged Gull (Larus michahellis) chicks along the Spanish Western Mediterranean coast: the relevance of refuse dumps. J Ornithol 150:265–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose M, Nol E (2010) Foraging behavior of non-breeding semipalmated plovers. Waterbirds 33:59–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapoznikow A, Quintana F (2003) Foraging behavior and feeding locations of imperial cormorants and rock shags breeding in sympatry in Patagonia, Argentina. Waterbirds 26:184–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Shealer D (1998) Size-selective predation by a specialist forager, the roseate tern. Auk 115:519–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva MP, Favero M, Martínez M (1999) Prey size selectivity by kelp gulls on Antarctic limpets at King George Island, Antarctica. Polar Biol 21:397–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Skórka P, Wójcik JD (2008) Habitat utilization, feeding tactics and age related feeding efficiency in the Caspian gull Larus cachinnans. J Ornithol 149:31–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivak ED, Sánchez N (1992) Prey selection by Larus belcheri atlanticus in Mar Chiquita lagoon, Buenos Aires, Argentina: a possible explanation for its discontinuous distribution. Rev Chil Hist Nat 65:209–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivak E, Anger K, Luppi T, Bas C, Ismael D (1994) Distribution and habitat preferences of two grapsid crabs in Mar Chiquita Lagoon (Buenos Aires Province, Argentina). Helgolander Meeresun 48:59–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Suárez N (2010) Estrategias de alimentación de la Gaviota de Olrog (Larus atlanticus) y su relación con las fuentes de alimento. Doctoral thesis, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Argentina

  • Suárez N, Retana V, Yorio P (2011) Seasonal changes in diet and prey selection in the threatened Olrog’s gull Larus atlanticus breeding in Patagonia, Argentina. Ardeola 58:35–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas K, Kvitek RG, Bretz C (2003) Effects of human activity on the foraging behaviour of sanderlings Calidris alba. Biol Conserv 109:67–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhulst S, Oosterbeek K, Ens BJ (2001) Experimental evidence for effects of human disturbance on foraging and parental care in oystercatchers. Biol Conserv 101:375–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanless S, Harris MP (1993) Use of mutually exclusive foraging areas by adjacent colonies of blue-eyed dhags (Phalacrocorax atriceps) at South Georgia. Colon Waterbirds 16:176–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver DK, Kadlec JA (1970) A method for trapping adult gull. Bird-Banding 41:28–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittacker D, Knight RL (1998) Understanding wildlife responses to humans. Wildl Soc Bull 26:312–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson LJ, Daunt F, Wanless S (2004) Self-feeding and chick provisioning diet differ in the common guillemot Uria aalge. Ardea 92:197–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood AG, Naef-Daenzer P, Prince PA, Croxall JP (2000) Quantifying habitat use in satellite-tracked pelagic seabirds: application of kernel estimation to albatross locations. J Avian Biol 31:278–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates MG, Jones AR, Goss-Custard JD, Mc-Grorty S (1993) Satellite imagery to monitor ecological change in estuarine systems: example of the Wash, England. In: Moser MRC, Prentice RC, van Vessem J (eds) Waterfowl and wetland conservation in the 1990s-A global perspective (Proceedings of the international waterbird and wetlands research Bureau symposium, St. Petersburg Beach, Florida, USA). IWRB Spec. Publ. 26, Slimbridge, pp 56–60

  • Yorio P, Frere E, Gandini P, Conway W (1999) Status and conservation of seabirds breeding in Argentina. Bird Conserv Int 9:299–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Yorio P, Frere E, Gandini P, Schiavini A (2001) Tourism and recreation at seabird breeding sites in Patagonia, Argentina: current concerns and future prospects. Bird Conserv Int 11:231–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Yorio P, Quintana F, Gatto A, Lisnizer N, Suárez N (2004) Foraging patterns of breeding Olrog’s gull at Golfo San Jorge, Argentina. Waterbirds 27:193–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Yorio P, Bertellotti M, García Borboroglu P (2005) Estado poblacional y de conservación de gaviotas que reproducen en el litoral Argentino. Hornero 20:53–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalba SM, Nebbia AJ, Fiori SM (2008) Propuesta de Plan de Manejo de la Reserva Natural de Uso Múltiple Bahía San Blas. Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahía Blanca

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Wildlife Conservation Society for financial support, Centro Nacional Patagónico (CONICET) for institutional support, and Dirección de Administración de Áreas Protegidas (Ministerio de Asuntos Agrarios Provincia de Buenos Aires) for the permits to work at Bahía San Blas Reserve. Thanks to P. Dell’Arciprete for her help in spatial analysis and mapping.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pablo Yorio.

Additional information

Communicated by P. H. Becker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suárez, N., Retana, M.V. & Yorio, P. Spatial patterns in the use of foraging areas and its relationship with prey resources in the threatened Olrog’s Gull (Larus atlanticus). J Ornithol 153, 861–871 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-012-0812-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-012-0812-8

Keywords

Navigation