Skip to main content
Log in

Model comparison and assessment for multi-state capture–recapture–recovery models

  • EURING Proceedings
  • Published:
Journal of Ornithology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The work of this paper is motivated by a study of Great Cormorants, Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis, in Denmark. The dataset is complex, involving birds in different states living in and moving between neighbouring colonies. As a consequence, the set of probability models that might describe the data is large. In order to choose between the models, we present a score test approach for moving efficiently between the members of a model set with many members. We then provide a new measure for testing the absolute goodness-of-fit of the selected model to the data. This measure may be used when a model is multi-state/multi-site, and involves age- and time-dependence, as well as integrated recovery and recapture data, which is needed for the application. An illustration is provided by data from a single colony only, but with two breeding states, and an additional emigrated state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnason AN (1972) Parameter estimates from mark-recapture experiments on two populations subject to migration and death. Res Popul Ecology 13:97–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnason AN (1973) The estimation of population size, migration rates and survival in a stratified population. Res Popul Ecology 15:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baillie SR, Green RE (1987) The importance of variation in recovery rates when estimating survival rates from ringing recoveries. Acta Ornithol 23:41–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker RJ (1997) Joint modelling of live-recapture, tag-resight, and tag-recovery data. Biometrics 53:666–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker RJ (1999) Joint analysis of mark-recapture-resighting and ring-recovery data with age-dependence and marking effect. Bird Study 46:S82–S91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besbeas P, Borysiewicz RS, Morgan BJT (2009) Completing the ecological jigsaw. In: Thomson DL, Cooch EG, Conroy MJ (eds) Modeling demographic processes in marked populations. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, vol 3. Springer, Berlin, pp 513-539

  • Borysiewicz RS (2008) The combined analysis of multi-site mark-recapture-recovery and multi-site census data. PhD thesis, University of Kent

  • Burnham KP (1991) On a unified theory for release-sampling of animal populations. In: Chao MT, Cheng PE (eds) Proceedings of the 1990 Taipei symposium in statistics. Institute of Statistical Sciences, Academica Sinica, Taiwan, ROC

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and inference. A practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Catchpole EA, Morgan BJT (1996) Model selection in ring-recovery models using score tests. Biometrics 52:664–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catchpole EA, Morgan BJT (1997) Detecting parameter redundancy. Biometrika 84:187–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catchpole EA, Morgan BJT, Freeman SN, Harris MP (1998) Integrated recovery/recapture data analysis. Biometrics 54:33–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catchpole EA, Morgan BJT, Freeman SN, Peach WJ (1999) Modelling the survival of British lapwings Vanellus vanellus using weather covariates. Bird Study 46:S5–S13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catchpole EA, Morgan BJT, Tavecchia G (2008) A new method for analysing discrete life-history data with missing covariate values. J Roy Stat Soc B 70:445–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choquet R, Reboulet AM, Pradel R, Gimenez O, Lebreton JD (2004) M-SURGE: New software specifically designed for multistate capture-recapture models. Anim Biodivers Conserv 27:207–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Choquet R, Lebreton JD, Gimenez O, Reboulet AM, Pradel R (2009) U-CARE: Utilities for performing goodness of fit tests and manipulating CApture-REcapture data. Ecography 32:1071–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claeskens G, Hjort NL (2008) Model selection and model averaging. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole D (2011) Determining parameter redundancy of multi-state mark-recapture models for sea birds. J Ornithol (this issue)

  • Frederiksen M, Bregnballe T (2001) Conspecific reproductive success affects age of recruitment in a great cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis colony. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1519–1526

  • Gaillard JM, Viallefont A, Loison A, Festa-Bianchet M (2004) Assessing senescence patterns in populations of large mammals. Anim Biodivers Conserv 27.1:47–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Henaux V, Bregnballe T, Lebreton JD (2007) Dispersal and recruitment during population growth in a colonial sea bird, the great cormorant. J Avian Biol 38:44–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King R, Brooks SP (2003) Closed-form likelihoods for Arnason-Schwarz models. Biometrika 90:435–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebreton JD, Almeras T, Pradel R (1999) Competing events, mixtures of information and multistratum recapture models. Bird Study 46:S39–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrea RS (2010) Closed form likelihood for an age and time-dependent multi-state mark-recapture-recovery model. University of Kent Technical Report. UKC/SMSAS/10/017

  • McCrea RS, Morgan BJT (2010) Multi-site mark-recapture model selection using score tests. Biometrics (in press). doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01421.x

  • McCrea RS, Morgan BJT, Gimenez O, Lebreton JD, Bregnballe T (2010) Multi-site integrated population modelling. J Agric Biol Environ Stat (in press). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-010-0027-5

  • Morgan BJT, Palmer KJ, Ridout MS (2007) Negative score test statistic. Am Stat 61:285–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pledger S (2000) Unified maximum likelihood estimates for closed capture–recapture models using mixtures. Biometrics 56:434–442

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pledger S, Pollock KH, Norris JL (2003) Open capture-recapture models with heterogeneity: I. Cormack-Jolly-Seber model. Biometrics 59:786–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradel R (2004) Multievent: an extension of multistate capture-recapture models to uncertain states. Biometrics 61:442–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradel R, Wintrebert CMA, Gimenez O (2003) A proposal for a goodness-of-fit test to the Arnason-Schwarz multisite capture-recapture model. Biometrics 59:43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao CR (1948) Large sample tests of statistical hypotheses concerning several parameters with application to problems of estimation. Proc Camb Philos Soc 44:50–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read TRC, Cressie NAC (1988) Goodness-of-fit statistics for discrete multivariate data. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rouan L, Choquet R, Pradel R (2009) A general framework for modelling memory in capture-recapture data. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 14:338–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz C, Schweigert JF, Arnason AN (1993) Estimating migration rates using tag recovery data. Biometrics 59:291–318

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support of the EPSRC grant to the National Centre for Statistical Ecology and the helpful detailed comments of the anonymous referee.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Byron J. T. Morgan.

Additional information

Communicated by M. Schaub.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCrea, R.S., Morgan, B.J.T. & Bregnballe, T. Model comparison and assessment for multi-state capture–recapture–recovery models. J Ornithol 152 (Suppl 2), 293–303 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-010-0611-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-010-0611-z

Keywords

Navigation