Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A refined hydro-environmental watershed model with field-plot-scale resolution

  • Article
  • Published:
Paddy and Water Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A distributed hydro-environmental model is developed that achieves detailed analysis of the movement of water at a field-plot-scale resolution in a mesoscale watershed including lowland areas where, especially for agricultures, it is an essential need to get rid of redundant groundwater by drainage facilities such as rivers, canals and/or underdrains. For this, the problem geometry is meshed with unstructured cells of triangular shape. Profile of a column cell is zoned into two: surface zone and groundwater zone in which water movement is represented by combined tank and soil moisture sub-models, and well-defined two-dimensional unconfined shallow groundwater flow sub-model, respectively. The top-two sub-models serve to evaluate evapotranspiration, infiltration, soil water content, lateral surface water flow, and vertical percolation. The vertical percolation so evaluated is given as longitudinal recharge to the bottom sub-model for computing groundwater flow. Surface water–groundwater interactions through beds and stream-banks of perennial and ephemeral canals are considered by treating the canal courses as internal boundaries in the groundwater flow model. The finite volume method (FVM) that allows of unstructured mesh and produces conservative solutions is employed for groundwater flow computation. The model developed is applied to an actual watershed which includes a low-lying paddy area to quantify the hydrological impact of land-use management practices over a period of 29 years in which the farmland consolidation project was implemented and part of the paddy fields were converted to upland crop fields and housing lands. From the results obtained, it is concluded that the model presently developed lends itself to water—as well as land-use management practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alam AHMB, Takeuchi J, Kawachi T (2006) Development of distributed rainfall-runoff model incorporating soil moisture model. Trans JSIDRE 244:29–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR (1998) Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development. J Am Water Resour Assoc 34:73–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bormann H, Breuer L, Graff T, Huisman JA (2007) Analyzing the effects of soil properties changes associated with land use changes on the simulated water balance: a comparison of three hydrological catchment models for scenario analysis. Ecol Model 209:29–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brath A, Montanari A, Toth E (2004) Analysis of the effects of different scenarios of historical data availability on the calibration of a spatially-distributed hydrological model. J Hydrol 291:232–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavendish JC, Field DA, Frey WH (1985) An approach to automatic three-dimensional finite element mesh generation. Int J Numer Methods Eng 21:329–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiang WH, Kinzelbach W (2001) 3D-groundwater modeling with PMWIN—a simulation system for modeling groundwater flow and pollution. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Domenico PA, Mifflin MD (1965) Water from low permeability sediments and land subsidence. Water Resour Res 1(4):563–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Editorial Board of Imazu History (2003) History of Imazu, vol 3, Local Government, Imazu Town, 467 pp (in Japanese)

  • Famiglietti JS, Wood EF (1994) Multiscale modeling of spatially variable water and energy balance processes. Water Resour Res 30:3061–3078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flenckenstein JH, Niswonger RG, Fogg GE (2006) River-aquifer interactions, geologic heterogeneity, and low-flow management. Ground Water 44(6):837–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmig R (1997) Multiphase flow and transport processes in the subsurface. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Hundecha Y, Bardossy A (2004) Modeling of the effect of land use changes on the runoff generation of a river basin through parameter regionalization of a watershed model. J Hydrol 292:281–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Japan Society of Hydrology and Water Resources (1997) Handbook of hydrology and water resources, Asakura, Tokyo, 636 pp (in Japanese)

  • Krause S, Bronstert A, Zehe E (2007) Groundwater-surface water interactions in a North German lowland floodplain—implications for the river discharge dynamics and riparian water balance. J Hydrol 347:404–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lake Biwa Research Institute (1988) Moving atlas—Shiga prefecture regional environment atlas with data floppy disk, 83 pp (in Japanese)

  • Linsley RK, Kohler MA, Pauthus JLH (1958) Hydrology for Engineers. McGraw-Hill, New York, 340 pp

  • Mitsuno T, Nagahori K (1987) The structure of groundwater budget around Yoshii Weir—statistical analysis of ob-served groundwater level fluctuations around Yoshii Weir. Trans JSIDRE 127:27–33 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakae S, Yoshioka T (1998) Geology of the Kumagawa district. Geological survey of Japan, Tsukuba, 71 pp (in Japanese)

  • Nakae S, Yoshioka T, Naito K (2001) Geology of the Chikubu Shima district. Geological survey of Japan, Tsukuba, 71 pp (in Japanese)

  • Nakagiri T, Watanabe T, Horino H, Maruyama T (1998) Development of a hydrological system model in the Kino River Basin—analysis of irrigation water use by a hydrological system model (I)-. Trans JSIDRE 198:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Niehoff D, Fritsch U, Bronstert A (2002) Land-use impacts on storm-runoff generation: scenarios of land-use change and simulation of hydrological response in a meso-scale catchment in SW-Germany. J Hydrol 267:80–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell PE, Nash JE, Farrell JP (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part 2—the Brosna catchment at Ferbane. J Hydrol 10:317–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugawara M, Ozaki E, Watanabe I (1986) River forecasting of the upper Irrawaddy River at Sagaing, Burma, using the tank model. Rep Natl Res Center Disaster Prev 36:47–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan BQ, O’Connor KM (1996) Application of an empirical infiltration equation in the SMAR conceptual model. J Hydrol 185:275–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson DF (1981) Computing the n-dimensional Delaunay tessellation with application to Voronoi polytopes. Comput J 24(2):167–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junichiro Takeuchi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Takeuchi, J., Imagawa, C., Kawachi, T. et al. A refined hydro-environmental watershed model with field-plot-scale resolution. Paddy Water Environ 8, 175–187 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-010-0196-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-010-0196-4

Keywords

Navigation