Skip to main content
Log in

Calculated reciprocity? A comparative test with six primate species

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Primates Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Little evidence of calculated reciprocity has been found in non-human primates so far. In this study, we used a simple experimental set-up to test whether partners pulled a sliding table to altruistically provide food to each other in short-term interactions. We tested 46 dyads of chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas, orangutans, brown capuchin monkeys and spider monkeys to examine whether a subject’s tendency to provide food to a partner was directly affected by the partner’s previous behaviour, by the species, by the condition (i.e., whether the partner could access the food provided by the subject) and by the social tolerance levels within each dyad. Chimpanzees and orangutans were the only species pulling significantly more when the partner could retrieve the food altruistically provided. However, no species reciprocated food exchanges, as subjects’ probability to pull was not affected by the previous number of the partner’s pulls, with the possible exception of one orangutan dyad. Although subjects clearly knew how the apparatus worked and easily obtained food for themselves, individuals did not usually take the opportunity to provide food to their partners, suggesting that calculated reciprocity is not a common behaviour and that food exchanges are usually not reciprocated in the short-term within dyads.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addessi E, Crescimbene L, Visalberghi E (2008) Food and token quantity discrimination in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Anim Cogn 11:275–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Addessi E, Paglieri F, Focaroli V (2011) The ecological rationality of delay tolerance: insights from capuchin monkeys. Cognition 119:142–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amici F, Aureli F, Call J (2008) Fission-fusion dynamics, behavioral flexibility and inhibitory control in primates. Curr Biol 18:1415–1419

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amici F, Aureli F, Call J (2010) Monkeys and apes: are their cognitive skills really so different? Am J Phys Anthropol 143:188–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amici F, Call J, Aureli F (2012) Aversion to violation of expectations of food distribution: the role of social tolerance and relative dominance in seven primate species. Behaviour 149:345–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baayen RH (2008) Analyzing linguistic data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B (2013) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999999-2

  • Beran MJ (2001) Summation and numerousness judgments of sequentially presented sets of items by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 115:181–191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan SF, de Waal FBM (2002) A proximate perspective on reciprocal altruism. Hum Nat 13:129–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan SF, Silk JB, Henrich J, Mareno MC, Lambeth SP, Schapiro SJ (2009) Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) do not develop contingent reciprocity in an experimental task. Anim Cogn 12:587–597

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burkart JM, van Schaik CP (2010) Cognitive consequences of cooperative breeding in primates? Anim Cogn 13:1–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burkart JM, Fehr E, Efferson C, van Schaik CP (2007) Other-regarding preferences in a non-human primate: common marmosets provision food altruistically. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:19762–19766

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burkart JM, Hrdy SB, van Schaik CP (2009) Cooperative breeding and human cognitive evolution. Evol Anthropol 18:175–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Call J (2000) Estimating and operating on discrete quantities in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). J Comp Psychol 114:136–147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheney DL, Moscovice LR, Heesen M, Mundry R, Seyfarth RM (2010) Contingent cooperation between wild female baboons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:9562–9566

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH (2009) Cooperation between non-kin in animal societies. Nature 462:51–57

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Waal FBM (1997) The chimpanzee’s service economy: food for grooming. Evol Hum Behav 18:375–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Waal FBM, Luttrell LM (1988) Mechanisms of social reciprocity in three primate species: symmetrical relationship characteristics or cognition? Ethol Sociobiol 9:101–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson AJ (2002) An introduction to generalized linear models. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufour V, Pelé M, Neumann M, Thierry B, Call J (2009) Calculated reciprocity after all: computation behind token transfers in orangutans. Biol Lett 5:172–175

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Field A (2005) Discovering statistics using SPSS. Sage Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Forstmeier W, Schielzeth H (2011) Cryptic multiple hypotheses testing in linear models: overestimated effect sizes and the winner’s curse. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:47–55

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fox J, Weisberg S (2011) An R companion to applied regression, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman EW, Schulte BA, Brown JL (2010) Using behavioral observations and keeper questionnaires to assess social relationships among captive female African elephants. Zoo Biol 29:140–153

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes CM, Mundry R, Boesch C (2009) Long-term reciprocation of grooming in wild West-African chimpanzees. Proc R Soc B 276:699–706

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hattori Y, Kuroshima H, Fujita K (2005) Cooperative problem solving by tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella): spontaneous division of labor, communication and reciprocal altruism. J Comp Psychol 119:335–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser MD, Chen MK, Chen F, Chuang E (2003) Give unto others: genetically unrelated cotton-top tamarin monkeys preferentially give food to those who altruistically give food back. Proc R Soc B 270:2363–2370

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hemelrijk CK (1994) Support for being groomed in long-tailed macaques, Macaca fascicularis. Anim Behav 48:479–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrelko ES, Vick SJ, Buchanan-Smith HM (2012) Cognitive research in zoo-housed chimpanzees: influence of personality and impact on welfare. Am J Primatol 74:828–840

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeggi AV, Gurven M (2013) Reciprocity explains food sharing in humans and other primates independent of kin selection and tolerated scrounging: a phylogenetic meta-analysis. Proc R Soc B 280:20131615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen K, Hare B, Call J, Tomasello M (2006) What’s in it for me? Self-regard precludes altruism and spite in chimpanzees. Proc R Soc B 273:1013–1021

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koyama NF, Caws C, Aureli F (2006) Interchange of grooming and agonistic support in chimpanzees. Int J Primatol 27:1293–1309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakshminarayanan VR, Santos LR (2008) Capuchin monkeys are sensitive to others’ welfare. Curr Biol 18:R999–R1000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh P, Nelder JA (2008) Generalized linear models. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Melis AP, Hare B, Tomasello M (2006) Chimpanzees recruit the best collaborators. Science 311:1297–1300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melis AP, Hare B, Tomasello M (2008) Do chimpanzees reciprocate received favours? Anim Behav 76:951–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelé M, Dufour V, Thierry B, Call J (2009) Token transfers among great apes: species differences, gestural requests and reciprocal exchange. J Comp Psychol 123:375–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental designs and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabbatini G, de Bortoli Vizioli A, Visalberghi E, Schino G (2012) Food transfers in capuchin monkeys: an experiment on partner choice. Biol Lett 8:757–759

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Savage-Rumbaugh ES, Rumbaugh D, Boysen S (1978) Linguistically mediated tool use and exchange by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Behav Brain Sci 4:539–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schielzeth H, Forstmeier W (2009) Conclusions beyond support: overconfident estimates in mixed models. Behav Ecol 20:416–420

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schino G, Aureli F (2008) Grooming reciprocation among female primates: a meta-analysis. Biol Lett 4:9–11

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schino G, Aureli F (2009) Reciprocal altruism in primates: partner choice, cognition and emotions. Adv Stud Behav 39:45–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schino G, Aureli F (2010a) Primate reciprocity and its cognitive requirements. Evol Anthropol 19:130–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schino G, Aureli F (2010b) The relative roles of kinship and reciprocity in explaining primate altruism. Ecol Lett 13:45–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schino G, Pellegrini B (2009) Grooming in mandrills and the time frame of reciprocal partner choice. Am J Primatol 71:884–888

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silk JB (2003) Cooperation without counting: the puzzle of friendship. In: Hammerstein P (ed) Genetic and cultural evolution of cooperation. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 37–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Silk JB, Brosnan SF, Vonk J, Henrich J, Povinelli DJ, Richardson AS, Lambeth SP, Mascaro J, Shapiro SJ (2005) Chimpanzees are indifferent to the welfare of unrelated group members. Nature 27:1357–1359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silk JB, Brosnan SF, Henrich J, Lambeth SP, Shapiro SJ (2013) Chimpanzees share food for many reasons: the role of kinship, reciprocity, social bonds and harassment on food transfers. Anim Behav 85:941–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens JR (2010) Donor payoffs and other-regarding preferences in cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus). Anim Cogn 13:663–670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens JR, Hauser MD (2004) Why be nice? Psychological constraints on the evolution of cooperation. Trends Cogn Sci 8:60–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tan J, Hare B (2013) Bonobos share with strangers. PLoS ONE 8(1):e51922. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051922

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL (1971) The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q Rev Biol 46:35–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vonk J, Brosnan SF, Silk JB, Henrich J, Richardson AS, Lambeth SP, Schapiro SJ, Povinelli DJ (2008) Chimpanzees do not take advantage of very low cost opportunities to deliver food to unrelated group members. Anim Behav 75:1757–1770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto S, Tanaka M (2009) Do chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) spontaneously take turns in a reciprocal cooperation task? J Comp Psychol 123:242–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto S, Tanaka M (2010) The influence of kin relationship and reciprocal context on chimpanzees’ other-regarding preferences. Anim Behav 79:595–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was conducted while the first author held a Humboldt Research Fellowship for Postdoctoral Researchers (Humboldt ID number 1138999). We thank Elisabetta Visalberghi, Roberto Pacheco Mendez, Fernando Victoria Arceo, Iber Rodriguez Castillo and all the animal keepers at the different facilities for endless support and cooperation. Thanks to Sebastian Egner for coding data for inter-observer reliability purposes and to Hanna Petschauer for helping wonderfully with organizing data collection. This study complies with the ethical standards as laid down by the Primate Society of Japan and was ethically approved by an internal committee at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federica Amici.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material (DOCX 1744 kb)

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amici, F., Aureli, F., Mundry, R. et al. Calculated reciprocity? A comparative test with six primate species. Primates 55, 447–457 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-014-0424-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-014-0424-4

Keywords

Navigation