Skip to main content
Log in

A Cournot–Nash–Bertrand game theory model of a service-oriented Internet with price and quality competition among network transport providers

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Management Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper develops a game theory model of a service-oriented Internet in which profit-maximizing service providers provide substitutable (but not identical) services and compete with the quantities of services in a Cournot–Nash manner, whereas the network transport providers, which transport the services to the users at the demand markets, and are also profit-maximizers, compete with prices in Bertrand fashion and on quality. The consumers respond to the composition of service and network provision through the demand price functions, which are both quantity and quality dependent. We derive the governing equilibrium conditions of the integrated game and show that it satisfies a variational inequality problem. We then describe the underlying dynamics, and provide some qualitative properties, including stability analysis. The proposed algorithmic scheme tracks, in discrete-time, the dynamic evolution of the service volumes, quality levels, and the prices until an approximation of a stationary point (within the desired convergence tolerance) is achieved. Numerical examples demonstrate the modeling and computational framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altman E, Rojas J, Wong S, Hanawal MK, Xu Y (2011) Proceedings of the ICST conference on game theory for networks, Shanghai

  • Bertrand J (1883) Theorie mathematique de la richesse sociale. Journal des Savants 67:499–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Cournot AA (1838) Researches into the mathematical principles of the theory of wealth, English translation. MacMillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz JM (2008) Dynamics of supply chain networks with corporate social responsibility through integrated environmental decision-making. Eur J Oper Res 184:1005–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dafermos S, Nagurney A (1987) Oligopolistic and competitive behavior of spatially separated markets. Reg Sci Urban Econ 17:245–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupuis P, Nagurney A (1993) Dynamical systems and variational inequalities. Ann Oper Res 44:9–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyaberi JM, Parsons B, Pai VS, Kannan K, Chen Y-FR, Jana R, Stern D, Varshavsky A (2012) Managing cellular congestion using incentives. IEEE Communications Magazine, pp 100–107

  • Gabay D, Moulin H (1980) On the uniqueness and stability of Nash equilibria in noncooperative games. In: Bensoussan A, Kleindorfer P, Tapiero CS (eds) Applied stochastic control of econometrics and management science. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Ha S, Sen S, Joe-Wong C, Im Y, Chiang N (2012) Tube: time-dependent pricing for mobile data. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2012 conference on applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communication, SIGCOMM ’12. ACM, Helsinki, pp 247–258

  • He L, Walrand J (2005) Pricing differentiated internet services. In: Proceedings of INFOCOM, pp 195–204

  • Kausar N, Briscoe B, Crowcroft J (1999) A charging model for sessions on the internet. In: Leopold H, Garcia N (eds) European conference on multimedia applications, services and techniques (ECMAST’99), Lecture Notes in Computer Science. vol 1629. Springer, Berlin, pp 246–261

  • Kelly FP (1997) Charging and rate control for elastic traffic. Eur Trans Telecommun 8:33–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lv Q, Rouskas GN (2010) An economic model for pricing tiered network services. Ann Telecommun 65:147–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKie-Mason J, Varian H (1995) Pricing the Internet—progress and misconceptions. In: Kahin B, Keller J (eds) Access to the Internet. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 269–314

    Google Scholar 

  • McKnight LW, Bailey JP (eds) (1997) Internet economics. MIT Press, Cambridge

  • Nagurney A (1999) Network economics: a variational inequality approach second and revised edition. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nagurney A (2006) Supply chain network economics: dynamics of prices, flows, and profits. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagurney A (2010) Formulation and analysis of horizontal mergers among oligopolistic firms with insights into the merger paradox: a supply chain network perspective. Comput Manage Sci 7:377–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagurney A, Dupuis P, Zhang D (1994) A dynamical systems approach for network oligopolies and variational inequalities. Ann Reg Sci 28:263–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagurney A, Ke K, Cruz J, Hancock K, Southworth F (2002) Dynamics of supply chains: a multilevel (logistical/informational/ financial) network perspective. Environ Plan B 29:795–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagurney A, Li D (2013) A dynamic network oligopoly model with transportation costs, product differentiation, and quality competition. Comput Econ (in press)

  • Nagurney A, Takayama T, Zhang D (1995) Massively parallel computation of spatial price equilibrium problems as dynamical systems. J Econ Dyn Control 18:3–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagurney A, Wolf T, Li D, Saberi S (2013) A network economic game theory model of a service-oriented Internet with choices and quality competition. Netnomics (in press)

  • Nagurney A, Zhang D (1996) Projected dynamical systems and variational inequalities with applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nash JF (1950) Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 36:48–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash JF (1951) Noncooperative games. Ann Math 54:286–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neely MJ (2007) Optimal pricing in a free market wireless network. In: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM

  • Njoroge P, Ozdaglar A, Stier N, Weintraub G (2009) Competition, market coverage, and quality choice in interconnected platforms. In: Proceedings of NetEcon09, Stanford

  • Odlyzko A (1999) Paris metro pricing for the Internet. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on electronic commerce (EC’99), AM, pp 140–147

  • Ros D, Tuffin B (2004) A mathematical model of the Paris metro pricing scheme for charging packet networks. Comput Netw 46(1):73–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen S, Joe-Wong C, Ha S, Chiang M (2012) Incentivizing time-shifting of data: a survey of time-dependent pricing for Internet access. IEEE Commun 50(11):91–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shakkottai S, Srikant R (2006) Economics of network pricing with multiple ISPs. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw 16(6):1233–1259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen H, Basar T (2007) Optimal nonlinear pricing for a monopolistic service provider with complete and incomplete information. IEEE ISAC 25(6):1216–1223

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian H (1996) Economic issues facing the Internet. http://people.ischool.berkeley.edu/hal/Papers/econ-issues-internet.html

  • Varian HR (2001) The demand for bandwidth: evidence from the index project. In: Crandall RW, Alleman JH (eds) Broadband: should we regulate high-speed Internet access?. Aei-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, American Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC, pp 39–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf T, Griffioen J, Calvert K, Dutta R, Rouskas G, Baldine I, Nagurney A (2012) Choice as a principle in network architecture. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM, Helsinki

  • Zhang Z-L, Nabipay P, Odlyzko A, Guerin R (2010) Mini-conference proceedings, San Diego

  • Zhang D, Nagurney A (1995) On the stability of projected dynamical systems. J Optim Theory Appl 85:97–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported, in part, by the National Science Foundation (NSF) grant CISE #1111276, for the NeTS: Large: Collaborative Research: Network Innovation Through Choice project awarded to the University of Massachusetts Amherst. This support is gratefully acknowledged. The authors thank Ilia Baldine, Ken Calvert, Rudra Dutta, Jim Griffioen, George Rouskas, and Dong Li and Sara Saberi for many helpful discussions. The authors also acknowledge the helpful comments and suggestions of three anonymous reviewers on earlier versions of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Nagurney.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nagurney, A., Wolf, T. A Cournot–Nash–Bertrand game theory model of a service-oriented Internet with price and quality competition among network transport providers. Comput Manag Sci 11, 475–502 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10287-013-0183-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10287-013-0183-5

Keywords

Navigation