Skip to main content
Log in

Radiologists Help Each Other to Improve Efficiency by Decreasing the Time to Look Up a Patient’s Relevant Clinical History in the Electronic Medical Record

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study aims to prove that it takes less time to look up relevant clinical history from an electronic medical record (EMR) if the information is already provided in a specific space in the EMR by a fellow radiologist. Patients with complex oncological and surgical histories need frequent imaging, and every time a radiologist may spend a significant amount of time looking up the same clinical information as their peers. In collaboration with ACMIO and Radiant Epic team, a space labeled “Specialty Comments” was added to the SNAPSHOT of patient's chart in EMR. For our research purpose, the specialty comment was labeled as boxed history as a variable for data analysis. If the history was not provided in that particular space, it was labeled as without boxed history. Inclusion criteria included outpatients with complex oncological histories undergoing CT chest, abdomen, and pelvis with IV contrast. The time to look up history (LUT) was documented in minutes and seconds. Two assistant professors from Abdominal Imaging provided LUT. A total of 85 cases were included in the study, 39 with boxed history and 46 without boxed history. Comparing averages of the individual reader means for history, mean LUT differed by 2.03 min (without boxed history) versus 0.57 min (with boxed history), p < 0.0001. The t-test and the nonparametric Wilcoxon tests for a difference in the population means were highly significant (p < 0.0001). A history directed to radiologist's needs resulted in a statistically significant decrease in time spent by interpreting radiologists to look through the electronic medical records for patients with complex oncological histories. Availability of history pertinent to radiology has wide-ranging advantages, including quality reporting, decrease in turnaround time, reduction in interpretation errors, and radiologists’ continued learning. The space for documenting clinical history may be reproduced, or some similar area may be developed by optimizing the electronic medical records.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The author(s) declare(s) that they had full access to all of the data in this study and the author(s) take(s) complete responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

References

  1. Larson DB, Durand DJ, Siegal DS. Understanding and applying the concept of value creation in radiology. Journal of the American College of Radiology 2017;14:549-557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gunderman RB, Phillips MD, Cohen MD. Improving clinical histories on radiology requisitions. Academic radiology 2001;8:299-303

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Armstrong 2nd J. Morality, ethics, and radiologists' responsibilities. AJR American journal of roentgenology 1999;173:279-284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Loy CT, Irwig L. Accuracy of diagnostic tests read with and without clinical information: a systematic review. Jama 2004;292:1602-1609

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Reiner BI, Krupinski E. The insidious problem of fatigue in medical imaging practice. Journal of digital imaging 2012;25:3-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schemmel A, Lee M, Hanley T, et al. Radiology workflow disruptors: a detailed analysis. Journal of the American College of Radiology 2016;13:1210-1214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Waite S, Scott J, Gale B, et al. Interpretive error in radiology. American Journal of Roentgenology 2017;208:739-749

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fitzgerald R. Error in radiology. Clinical radiology 2001;56:938-946

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bowman C, Ambrosini V. Value creation versus value capture: towards a coherent definition of value in strategy. British journal of management 2000;11:1-15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Doshi AM, Moore WH, Kim DC, et al. Informatics solutions for driving an effective and efficient radiology practice. RadioGraphics 2018;38:1810-1822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Umber Shafique.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no financial disclosure. An abbreviated version of this study in PowerPoint format was presented as Quality Improvement report QI103-ED-X at RSNA 2020- 106th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, November 29 to December 5, 2020.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shafique, U., Hillis, S.L., Park, J.M. et al. Radiologists Help Each Other to Improve Efficiency by Decreasing the Time to Look Up a Patient’s Relevant Clinical History in the Electronic Medical Record. J Digit Imaging 36, 388–394 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-022-00726-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-022-00726-4

Keywords

Navigation