Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tablets for Image Review and Communication in Daily Routine of Orthopedic Surgeons—An Evaluation Study

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Medical images are essential in modern traumatology and orthopedic surgery. Access to images is often cumbersome due to a limited number of workstations. Moreover, due to the tremendous increase of data, the time to review or to communicate images has also become limited. One approach to overcome these problems is to make use of modern mobile devices, like tablet computers, to facilitate image access and associated workflows. Ten orthopedic surgeons were equipped with an Apple iPad mini 2 and specialized viewing software for medical images. The surgeons were able to send images from a workstation onto the tablets or to search for patient images directly. The software enabled the physicians to share images, annotated key slices, and messages instantly with their colleagues. The surgeons carried the tablets within or in the periphery of the hospital. The participants evaluated the software by means of daily questionnaires. Data was collected for a period of 9 months. Nearly 25 images were viewed in total by the surgeons per day. The tablet viewer was used for accessing approximately 30% of these images. On average, the surgeons were asked 1.7 times per day by a colleague for a second opinion. They used the tablets in approximately 29% of these cases. Furthermore, the mean time for accessing images was significantly lower using mobile software compared to conventional methods. Tablet computers can play a vital role for image access and communication in the daily routine of an orthopedic surgeon. Mobile image access is an important aspect for surgeons, especially in larger facilities, to facilitate and accelerate the clinical workflows.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. European Commission: Eurostat statistics database 2015. Healthcare personnel statistics - physicians. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Healthcare_personnel_statistics_-_physicians#Further_Eurostat_information. Accessed Nov 08, 2016

  2. European Commission. : Eurostat statistics database 2015. Healthcare resource statistics - technical resources and medical technology.. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Healthcare_resource_statistics_-_technical_resources_and_medical_technology#Use_of_medical_technology. Accessed Nov 08, 2016

  3. OECD: "Health care resources", OECD Health Statistics (database). doi:10.1787/data-00541-en. Accessed on 27 February 2017

  4. Zan E, Yousem DM, Carone M, Lewin JS: Second-opinion consultations in neuroradiology. Radiology 255(1):135–141, 2010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mallory MA, Losk K, Lin NU, Sagara Y, Birdwell RL, Cutone L, Camuso K, Bunnell C, Aydogan F, Golshan M: The Influence of Radiology Image Consultation in the Surgical Management of Breast Cancer Patients. Ann Surg Oncol 22(10):3383–3388, 2015

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Khalilzadeh O, Rahimian M, Batchu V, Vadvala HV, Novelline RA, Choy G: Effectiveness of second-opinion radiology consultations to reassess the cervical spine CT scans: a study on trauma patients referred to a tertiary-care hospital. Diagn Interv Radiol. 21(5):423–427, 2015

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ricci WM, Borrelli J: Teleradiology in orthopaedics. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 421:64–69, 2004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Malan DF, van der Walt SJ, Raidou RG, van den Berg B, Stoel BC, Botha CP, Nelissen RGHH, Valstar ER: A fluoroscopy-based planning and guidance software tool for minimally invasive hip refixation by cement injection. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 11(2):281–296, 2016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Maruyama K, Kin T, Saito T, Suematsu S, Gomyo M, Noguchi A, Nagane M, Shiokawa Y: Neurosurgical simulation by interactive computer graphics on iPad. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 9(6):1073–1078, 2014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Boissin C, Blom L, Wallis L, Laflamme L: Image-based teleconsultation using smartphones or tablets: qualitative assessment of medical experts. Emerg Med J. 2016 Oct 5. Publisher Item Identifier (PII): emermed-2015-205258 (Open Access)

  11. Stahl I, Dreyfuss D, Ofir D, Merom L, Raichel M, Hous N, Norman D, Haddad E: Reliability of smartphone-based teleradiology for evaluating thoracolumbar spine fractures. Spine J. Publisher Item Identifier (PII) S1529-9430(16):30882–30888, 2016

    Google Scholar 

  12. Khanna V, Sambandam SN, Gul A: Mounasamy V: "WhatsApp"ening in orthopaedic care: a concise report from a 300-bedded tertiary care teaching center. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 25(5):821–826, 2015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. De Maio P, White LM, Bleakney R, Menezes RJ, Theodoropoulos J: Diagnostic accuracy of an iPhone DICOM viewer for the interpretation of magnetic resonance imaging of the knee. Clin J Sport Med. 24(4):308–314, 2014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tewes S, Rodt T, Marquardt S, Evangelidou E, Wacker FK, von Falck C: Evaluation of the use of a tablet computer with a high-resolution display for interpreting emergency CT scans. Rofo. 185(11):1063–1069, 2013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. mbits imaging GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany: mRay, Radiological image viewer for mobile devices with image processing functions. https://mbits.info/mray. Accessed on Nov 10, 2016

  16. John S, Poh AC, Lim TC, Chan EH, Chong le R: The iPad tablet computer for mobile on-call radiology diagnosis? Auditing discrepancy in CT and MRI reporting. J Digit Imaging. 25(5):628–634, 2012

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Caffery LJ, Armfield NR, Smith AC: Radiological interpretation of images displayed on tablet computers: a systematic review. Br J Radiol. 88(1050):20150191, 2015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Baysari MT, Adams K, Lehnbom EC, Westbrook JI, Day RO: iPad use at the bedside: a tool for engaging patients in care processes during ward rounds? Intern Med J. 44(10):986–990, 2014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Park JH, Kim YK, Kim B, Kim J, Kwon H, Kim K, Choi SI, Chun EJ: Diagnostic performance of smartphone reading of the coronary CT angiography in patients with acute chest pain at ED. Am J Emerg Med. 34(9):1794–1798, 2016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study team wants to thank the IT department of the trauma center for supporting this study by implementing the infrastructural environment. Furthermore, we want to thank the local ethics committee for approving this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jochen Franke.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

Michael Müller is an employee of a company whose products are mentioned in the manuscript: mbits imaging GmbH.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study presented in this article was approved by the local ethics committee in 2015.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 6kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vetter, S.Y., Schüler, S., Hackbusch, M. et al. Tablets for Image Review and Communication in Daily Routine of Orthopedic Surgeons—An Evaluation Study. J Digit Imaging 31, 74–83 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-017-0011-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-017-0011-5

Keywords

Navigation