Skip to main content
Log in

‘Wet Reads’ in the Age of PACS: Technical and Workflow Considerations for a Preliminary Report System

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Communication between clinicians, technologists, and radi ologists has become more complex, with Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) now allowing the radiologist to be removed from the physical location of the patients and the site of imaging. With these changes, effective communication becomes an ongoing challenge. Efficient communication of study interpretations has also become a priority for radiologists as they struggle to maintain relevance and provide added value to patient care when clinicians have ready access to radiology images. The purpose of this paper is to share our experience in developing and implementing the Collaborative Notification System (CNS), a communication tool used to inform referring clinicians of urgent findings—a.k.a. “wet reads.” The system utilizes a system of web pages integrated into PACS for the sending and receiving of succinct messages to provide clinical information at the point of need. A second system of pager alerts provides notification of the need for such communication through a relatively unintrusive, one-way, acknowledged alert system. The CNS provides asynchronous, integrated communication for the reporting of urgent and emergent radiology findings in a complex, geographically distributed medical environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig 1
Fig 2
Fig 3
Fig 4
Fig 5
Fig 6
Fig 7
Fig 8
Fig 9
Fig 10
Fig 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Coiera E: Clinical communication: a new informatics paradigm. Proceedings of the AMIA Annual Fall Symposium, 1996, pp 17–21, 1996

  2. RE Condon (2004) ArticleTitleAll radiology reports should be in the medical record Am J Surg 187 IssueID2 153–154 Occurrence Handle14769297 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.03.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. J Parker E Coiera (2000) ArticleTitleImproving clinical communication: A view from psychology J Am Med Inform Assoc 7 IssueID5 453–461 Occurrence Handle10984464

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. KP Andriole DE Avrin E Weber DM Luth TM Bazzill (2001) ArticleTitleAutomated examination notification of emergency department images in a picture archiving and communication system J Digit Imaging 14 IssueID2 Suppl 1 143–144 Occurrence Handle11442076 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2Fhs12mtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF03190319

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. S Horii R Redfern E Feingold H Kundel C Nodine D Arnold S Abbuhl R Lowe I Brikman (2001 Dec) ArticleTitleAn automated results notification system for PACS J Digit Imaging 14 IssueID4 192–198 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10278-001-0105-x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD387mtlGntQ%3D%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Mates.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mates, J., Branstetter, B.F., Morgan, M.B. et al. ‘Wet Reads’ in the Age of PACS: Technical and Workflow Considerations for a Preliminary Report System. J Digit Imaging 20, 296–306 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-006-1049-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-006-1049-y

Key Words

Navigation