Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Silorane, ormocer, methacrylate and compomer long-term staining susceptibility using ΔE and ΔE 00 colour-difference formulas

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Odontology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the staining susceptibility of a silorane (Filtek Silorane), an ormocer (Ceram X Duo), a methacrylate (Tetric EvoCeram) and a compomer (Dyract) exposed on the long term to various staining agents by using ΔE and ΔE 00 colour-difference formulas. Thirty-six disc-shaped specimens were made of each of the four chemically different materials, randomly divided in six groups (n = 6) and immersed in five staining solutions (red wine, juice, coke, tea and coffee) or stored dry (control) in an incubator at 37 °C for 99 days. Spectrophotometric measurements by means of a spectrophotometer (Spectroshade Handy Dental, MHT) were repeated over a white (L* = 92.6, a* = −1.2, b* = 2.9) and black (L* = 1.6, a* = 1.2, b* = −1.0) background made of plasticized paper, in order to determine the colour changes according to ΔE, ΔE 00 and translucency formulas. Statistical analysis was performed by means of factorial Anova, Fisher’s LSD test (post hoc) and a Spearman rank correlation between ΔE and ΔE 00. When analysed over a white background, mean ΔE 00 values were highly significantly different and varied from 0.8 (Ceram X Duo/air) to 20.9 (Ceram X Duo/red wine). When analysed over a black background, mean ΔE 00 values were highly significantly different and varied from 1.0 (Ceram X Duo and Tetric/air) to 25.2 (Ceram X Duo/red wine). Differences in translucency varied from 0.3 (Ceram X Duo/air) to 21.1 (Ceram X Duo/juice). The correlation between ΔE and ΔE 00 over a white background was 0.9928, while over a black background, it was 0.9886.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Spreafico RC, Krejci I, Dietschi D. Clinical performance and marginal adaptation of class II direct and semidirect composite restorations over 3.5 years in vivo. J Dent. 2005;33:499–507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lander E, Dietschi D. Endocrowns: a clinical report. Quintessence Int. 2008;39:99–106.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dietschi D. Optimising aesthetics and facilitating clinical application of free-hand bonding using the ‘natural layering concept’. Br Dent. J. 2008;23:181–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pastila P, Lassila LV, Jokinen M, Vuorinen J, Vallittu PK, Mäntylä T. Effect of short-term water storage on the elastic properties of some dental restorative materials–A resonant ultrasound spectroscopy study. Dent Mater. 2007;23:878–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Morena R, Beaudreau GM, Lockwood PE, Evans AL, Fairhurst CW. Fatigue of dental ceramics in a simulated oral environment. J Dent Res. 1986;65:993–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ardu S, Braut V, Gutemberg D, Krejci I, Dietschi D, Feilzer AJ. A long-term laboratory test on staining susceptibility of esthetic composite resin materials. Quintessence Int. 2010;41:695–702.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferracane JL. Correlation between hardness and degree of conversion during the setting reaction of unfilled dental restorative resins. Dent Mater. 1985;1:11–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferracane JL, Moser JB, Greener EH. Ultraviolet light-induced yellowing of dental restorative resins. J Prosthet Dent. 1985;54:483–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Douglas WH, Craig RG, Douglas WH. Resistance to extrinsic stains by hydrophobic composite resin systems. J Dent Res. 1982;61:41–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Satou N, Khan AM, Matsumae I, Satou J, Shintani H. In vitro color change of composite-based resins. Dent Mater. 1989;5:384–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Waerhaug J. Temporary restorations: advantages and disadvantages. Dent Clin North Am. 1980;24:305–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pipko JD, El-Sadeek M. An in vitro investigation of abrasion and staining of dental resins. J Dent Res. 1972;51:689–705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nordbo H, Attramadal A, Eriksen HM. Iron discoloration of acrylic resin exposed to chlorhexidine or tannic acid: a model study. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;49:126–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Um CM, Ruyter IE. Staining of resin-based veneering materials with coffee and tea. Quintessence Int. 1991;22:377–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Scotti R, Mascellani SC, Forniti F. The in vitro color stability of acrylic resin for provisional restorations. Int J Prosthodont. 1997;10:164–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Asmussen E, Hansen EK. Surface discoloration of restorative resins in relation to surface softening and oral hygiene. Scand J Dent Res. 1986;94:174–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bolt RA, Bosh JJ, Coops JC. Influence of window size in small-window colour measurement, particularly of teeth. Phys Med Biol. 1994;39:1133–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hachiya Y, Iwaku M, Hosoda H, Fusayama T. Relation of finish to discoloration of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;52:811–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shintani H, Satou J, Satou N, Hayashira H, Inoue T. Effects of various finishing methods on staining and accumulation of Streptococcus mutans HS-6 on composite resins. Dent Mater. 1985;1:225–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Van Groeningen G, Jonnebloed W, Arends J. Composite degradation in vivo. Dent Mater. 1986;2:225–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Abu-Bakr N, Han L, Okamoto A, Iwaku M. Color stability of compomer after immersion in various media. J Esthet Dent. 2000;12:258–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fay RM, Walker CS, Power JM. Discoloration of a compomer by stains. J Great Houst Dent Soc. 1998;69:12–3.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fay RM, Walker CS, Power JM. Color stability of hybrid ionomers after immersion in stains. Am J Dent. 1998;11:71–2.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Reis AF, Giannini M, Lovadino JR, Ambrosano JM. Effects of various finishing systems on the surface roughness and staining susceptibility of packable composite resins. Dent Mater. 2003;19:12–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chan KC, Fuller JL, Hormati AA. The ability of foods to stain two composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 1980;43:542–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gross MD, Moser JB. A colorimetric study of coffee and tea staining of four composite resins. J Oral Rehabil. 1977;4:311–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Luce MS, Campbell CE. Stain potential of four microfilled composites. J Prosthet Dent. 1988;60:151–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bagheri R, Burrow MF, Tyas M. Influence of food-stimulating solutions and surface finish on susceptibility to staining of aesthetic restorative materials. J Dent. 2005;33:389–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Borges AB, Marsilio AL, Pagani C, Rodrigues JR. Surface roughness of packable composite resins polished with various systems. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2004;16:42–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Park SH, Noh BD, Ahn HJ, Kim HK. Celluloid strip-finished versus polished composite surface: difference in surface discoloration in microhybrid composites. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31:62–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gönülol N, Yilmaz F. The effects of finishing and polishing techniques on surface roughness and color stability of nanocomposites. J Dent. 2012;40(Suppl 2):e64–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ertas E, Güler AU, Yècel AC, Köprül H, Güler E. Color stability of resin composites after immersion in different drinks. Dent Mater. 2006;25:371–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Leloup G, Holvoet PE, Bebelman S, Devaux J. Raman scattering determination of the depth of cure of light-activated composites: influence of different clinically relevant parameters. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29:510–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ardu S, Gutemberg D, Krejci I, Feilzer AJ, Di Bella E, Dietschi D. Influence of water sorption on resin composite color and color variation amongst various composite brands with identical shade code: an in vitro evaluation. J Dent. 2011;39(Suppl 1):e37–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ardu S, Braut V, Di Bella E, Lefever D. Influence of background on natural tooth colour coordinates: an in vivo evaluation. Odontology. 2014;102:267–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ghinea R, Pérez MM, Herrera LJ, Rivas MJ, Yebra A, Paravina RD. Color difference thresholds in dental ceramics. J Dent. 2010;38(Suppl 2):e57–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Cariology and Endodontology, University Clinic of Dental Medicine (CUMD), University of Geneva, Rue Barthélemy-Menn 19, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland

    Ladislav Gregor & Ivo Krejci

  2. Department of Economics and Quantitative Methods, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy

    Enrico Di Bella

  3. Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and VU University Amsterdam, Gustav Mahlerlaan 3004, 1081 LA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Albert J. Feilzer

  4. Treatment Plan Unit and Division of Cariology and Endodontology, University Clinic of Dental Medicine (CUMD), University of Geneva, Rue Barthélemy-Menn 19, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland

    Stefano Ardu

Authors
  1. Ladislav Gregor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ivo Krejci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Enrico Di Bella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Albert J. Feilzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Stefano Ardu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Ardu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gregor, L., Krejci, I., Di Bella, E. et al. Silorane, ormocer, methacrylate and compomer long-term staining susceptibility using ΔE and ΔE 00 colour-difference formulas. Odontology 104, 305–309 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-015-0212-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-015-0212-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation