Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Explaining organizational susceptibility to coercive pressure: results from a field experiment on e-invoicing IOIS adoption

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Information Systems and e-Business Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The establishment of the interoperability of accounting and other IS with those of business partners is regarded as a primary source of efficiency gains and innovation for organizations in today’s networked economy. Thus, inter-organizational information systems (IOIS) play a critical role in present day organizations and their relationships with business partners. Nevertheless, potential benefits that can be achieved from an IOIS implementation are tightly connected to the achievement of a critical number of adopters among business partners. One primary strategy introduced in this context is the exertion of coercive pressure to persuade business partners to adopt. However, results of prior investigations on the influence of coercive pressure on organizational adoption decisions have varied, while experimental investigations of coercive pressure as a strategy to foster adoption of IOIS among business partners have remained scarce. This study conducts a controlled field experiment on organizational level to investigate the effect of applied coercive pressure on the adoption of IOIS among 126 business partners of a medium-sized firm in Germany. Results present empirical evidence for a positive effect of coercive pressure. Assuming a configurational perspective, several organizational characteristics are further hypothesized to moderate this relationship. The type of industry and the degree of technology readiness are found to be significant moderators. The results emphasize the importance of a configurational perspective in investigations on the organizational level, and provide decision-makers with valuable insights into the mechanisms that drive the effect of coercive pressure as a strategy to foster adoption of IOIS among business partners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Au YA, Kauffman RJ (2001) Should we wait? Network externalities, compatibility, and electronic billing adoption. J Manag Inf Syst 18:47–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Bala H, Venkatesh V (2007) Assimilation of interorganizational business process standards. Inf Syst Res 18:340–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I (2011) Field experiments with firms. J Econ Perspect 25:63–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bapna R, Goes P, Wei Kwok Kee, Zhang Zhongju (2011) A finite mixture logit model to segment and predict electronic payments system adoption. Inf Syst Res 22:118–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee D, Grewal R, Sambamurthy V (2002) Shaping up for E-Commerce: institutional Enablers of the Organizational Assimilation of Web Technologies. Management Information Systems Quarterly 26:65–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chau PYK, Hui KL (2001) Determinants of small business EDI adoption: an empirical investigation. J Organ Comput Electron Commer 11:229–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Chwelos P, Benbasat I, Dexter AS (2001) Research report: empirical Test of an EDI adoption model. Inf Syst Res 12:304–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG (2002) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 3rd edn. Taylor & Francis Ltd., Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramér H (1946) Mathematical Methods of Statistics. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Damanpour F (1992) Organizational size and innovation. Organ Stud 13:375–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirkan H, Bess C, Spohrer J, Rayes A, Allen D (2015) Innovations with smart service systems: analytics, big data, cognitive assistance, and the internet of everything. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 37:733–752

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Soc Rev 48:147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2005) The new SME definition—user guide and model declaration. European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Fichman RG (2004) Going beyond the dominant paradigm for information technology innovation research: emerging concepts and methods. J Assoc Inf Syst 5:314–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Field AP, Hole G (2003) How to design and report experiments. Sage Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1925) Statistical methods for research workers. Cosmo Publications, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiss PC (2007) A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Acad Manag Rev 32:1180–1198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiss PC, Marx A, Cambré B (2013) Configurational theory and methods in organizational research: introduction. In: Fiss PC, Cambré B, Marx A (eds) Configurational theory and methods in organizational research. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bradford, pp 1–22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Grant AM, Wall TD (2008) The neglected science and art of quasi-experimentation: why-to, when-to, and how-to advice for organizational researchers. Organ Res Methods 12:653–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison GW, List JA (2004) Field experiments. J Econ Lit 42:1009–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart P, Saunders C (1997) Power and trust: critical factors in the adoption and use of electronic data interchange. Organ Sci 8:23–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart PJ, Saunders CS (1998) Emerging electronic partnerships: antecedents and dimensions of EDI Use from the supplier’s perspective. J Manag Inf Syst 14:87–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong W, Zhu K (2006) Migrating to internet-based E-commerce: factors affecting E-commerce adoption and migration at the firm level. Inf Manag 43:204–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard M, Vidgen R, Powell P (2006) Automotive E-hubs: exploring motivations and barriers to collaboration and interaction. J Strateg Inf Syst 15:51–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iacovou CL, Benbasat I, Dexter AS (1995) Electronic data interchange and small organizations: adoption and impact of technology. Manag Inf Syst Q 19:465–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iskandar BY, Kurokawa S, LeBlanc LJ (2001) Adoption of electronic data interchange: the role of buyer–supplier relationships. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 48:505–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson M, Cox DR (2013) The principles of experimental design and their application in sociology. Annu Rev Soc 39:27–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeyaraj A, Rottman JW, Lacity MC (2006) A review of the predictors, linkages, and biases in IT innovation adoption research. J Inf Technol 21:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz ML, Shapiro C (1986) Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities. J Polit Econ 94:822–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman RJ, Mohtadi H (2004) Proprietary and open systems adoption in E-procurement: a risk-augmented transaction cost perspective. J Manag Inf Syst 21:137–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim B, Barua A, Whinston AB (2002) Virtual field experiments for a digital economy: a nnew research methodology for exploring an information economy. Decis Support Syst 32:215–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch B (2014) E-invoicing/E-billing—key stakeholders as game changers. Billentis, Wil

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreuzer S, Eckhardt A, Bernius S, Krönung J (2013) A unified view of electronic invoicing adoption: developing a meta-model on the governmental level. In: HICSS 2013 proceedings, Maui

  • Kreuzer S, Krönung J, Bernius S (2014) Dismantling the environmental context—the role of environmental characteristics in the organizational adoption of open standard-based inter-organizational information systems. In: ECIS 2014 proceedings, Tel Aviv

  • Kuehne K, Kosch L, Cuylen A (2015) Will XML-based electronic invoice standards succeed? An explorative study. In: ECIS 2015 proceedings, Münster

  • Lempinen H, Penttinen E (2009) Assessing the business value of electronic order-to-payment cycle. In: ECIS 2009 proceedings, Verona

  • Liebowitz SJ, Margolis SE (1994) Network externality: an uncommon tragedy. J Econ Perspect 8:133–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loukis E, Charalabidis Y (2012) Business value of information systems interoperability—a balanced scorecard approach. In: ECIS 2012 proceedings, Barcelona

  • Lyytinen K, Damsgaard J (2011) Inter-organizational information systems adoption—a configuration analysis approach. Eur J Inf Syst 20:496–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus ML, Loebbecke C (2013) Commoditized digital processes and business community platforms: new opportunities and challenges for digital business strategies. Manag Inf Syst Q 37:649–654

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin SL, Liao H, Campbell EM (2013) Directive versus empowering leadership: a field experiment comparing impacts on task proficiency and proactivity. Acad Manag J 56:1372–1395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElheran K (2015) Do market leaders lead in business process innovation? The case(s) of E-business adoption. Manag Sci 61:1197–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer AD, Tsui AS, Hinings CR (1993) Configurational approaches to organizational analysis. Acad Manag J 36:1175–1195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller D (1984) Organizations: a quantum view. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller D (1986) Configurations of strategy and structure: towards a synthesis. Strateg Manag J 7:233–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller D (1987) The genesis of configuration. Acad Manag Rev 12:686–701

    Google Scholar 

  • Penttinen E, Tuunainen VK (2010) Assessing the effect of external pressure in inter-organizational IS adoption—case electronic invoicing. In: Sharman R, Rao HR, Raghu TS (eds) Exploring the grand challenges for next generation E-business. Springer, Berlin, pp 269–278

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer J, Salancik GR (1978) The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Premkumar G, Ramamurthy K (1995) The role of interorganizational and organizational factors on the decision mode for adoption of interorganizational systems. Decis Sci 26:303–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provan KG, Beyer JM, Kruytbosch C (1980) Environmental linkages and power in resource-dependence relations between organizations. Adm Sci Q 25:200–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragin CC (2013) Foreword: the distinctiveness of configurational research. In: Fiss PC, Cambré B, Marx A (eds) Configurational theory and methods in organizational research. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bradford, pp xv–xx

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rai A, Patnayakuni R, Seth N (2006) Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities. MIS Q 30:225–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond L, Bergeron F (1996) EDI success in small and medium-sized enterprises: a field study. J Organ Comput Electron Commer 6:161–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimers K, Johnston RB, Klein S (2013) An empirical evaluation of existing IS change theories for the case of IOIS evolution. Eur J Inf Syst 23:373–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riggins FJ, Mukhopadhyay T, Kriebel CH (1995) Optimal policies for subsidizing supplier interorganizational system adoption. J Organ Comput 5:295–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Robey D, Im G, Wareham J (2008) Theoretical foundations of empirical research on interorganizational systems: assessing past contributions and guiding future directions. J Assoc Inf Syst 9:497–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro C, Varian H (1998) Information rules: a strategic guide to the network economy. Harvard Business Review Press, Watertown

    Google Scholar 

  • Sila I (2010) Do organisational and environmental factors moderate the effects of internet-based interorganisational systems on firm performance? Eur J Inf Syst 19:581–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Son J-Y, Benbasat I (2007) Organizational buyers’ adoption and use of B2B electronic marketplaces: efficiency- and legitimacy-oriented perspectives. J Manag Inf Syst 24:55–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Son J-Y, Narasimhan S, Riggins FJ (2005) Effects of relational factors and channel climate on EDI usage in the customer–supplier relationship. J Manag Inf Syst 22:321–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Son J-Y, Narasimhan S, Riggins FJ, Kim N (2008) Understanding the development of IOS-based trading partner relationships: a structural model with empirical validation. J Organ Comput Electron Commer 18:34–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Spann M, Hinz O, Hann I-H, Skiera B (2010) Decision making in virtual worlds: an experimental test of altruism, fairness and presence. In: ECIS 2010 proceedings, Pretoria

  • Sutanto J, Palme E, Tan C-H, Phang CW (2013) Addressing the personalization-privacy paradox: an empirical assessment from a field experiment on smartphone users. Manag Inf Syst Q 37:1141–1164

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo HH, Wei KK, Benbasat I (2003) Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: an institutional perspective. Manag Inf Syst Q 27:19–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo TSH, Ranganathan C, Dhaliwal J (2006) Key dimensions of inhibitors for the deployment of web-based business-to-business electronic commerce. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 53:395–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thong JYL (1999) An integrated model of information systems adoption in small businesses. J Manag Inf Syst 15:187–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thong JY, Yap C-S (1995) CEO characteristics, organizational characteristics and information technology adoption in small businesses. Omega 23:429–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thong JYL, Yap C-S, Raman KS (1996) Top management support, external expertise and information systems implementation in small businesses. Inf Syst Res 7:248–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tornatzky LG, Fleischer M (1990) The processes of technological innovation. Lexington Books, Lexington

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai M-C, Lai K-H, Hsu W-C (2013) A study of the institutional forces influencing the adoption intention of RFID by suppliers. Inf Manag 50:59–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh V, Bala H (2012) Adoption and impacts of interorganizational business process standards: role of partnering synergy. Inf Syst Res 23:1131–1157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade MR, Tingling P (2005) A new twist on an old method: a guide to the applicability and use of web experiments in information systems research. Database 36:69–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler RL, Murphy AH (1973) Experiments in the laboratory and the real world. Organ Behav Hum Perform 10:252–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu X, Subramaniam C (2011) Understanding and predicting radio frequency identification (RFID) adoption in supply chains. J Organ Comput Electron Commer 21:348–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao Y, Zhu KX (2012) Do electronic linkages reduce the bullwhip effect? An empirical analysis of the US manufacturing supply chains. Inf Syst Res 23:1042–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu K, Kraemer KL (2005) Post-Adoption variations in usage and value of e-business by organizations: cross-country evidence from the retail industry. Inf Syst Res 16:61–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu K, Kraemer K, Xu S (2003) Electronic business adoption by European firms: a cross-country assessment of the facilitators and inhibitors. Eur J Inf Syst 12:251–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu K, Kraemer KL, Gurbaxani V, Xu SX (2006a) Migration to open-standard interorganizational systems: network effects, switching costs, and path dependency. Manag Inf Syst Q 30:515–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu K, Kraemer KL, Xu S (2006b) The process of innovation assimilation by firms in different countries: a technology diffusion perspective on E-business. Manag Sci 52:1557–1576

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Information Systems, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Theodor-W.-Adorno-Platz 3, 60629, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

    Stanislav Kreuzer

Authors
  1. Stanislav Kreuzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stanislav Kreuzer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kreuzer, S. Explaining organizational susceptibility to coercive pressure: results from a field experiment on e-invoicing IOIS adoption. Inf Syst E-Bus Manage 15, 159–195 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-016-0314-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-016-0314-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation