Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effect of the entry and re-entry size in the aortic dissection: a two-way fluid–structure interaction simulation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aortic dissection (AD) is one of the most catastrophic cardiovascular diseases. AD occurs when a layer inside the aorta is disrupted and gives rise to the formation of a true lumen and a false lumen. These lumens can be connected through tears in the intimal flap which are known as entries. Despite being known for about two centuries, the effects of many factors on the morbidity and mortality of this disease are still unknown. As the blood interaction with the aorta is crucial in the severity and the progression of the aortic dissection, a biomechanical approach is chosen to investigate the influence of different morphologies on the severity of this disease. Using the finite element method (FEM) and the fluid–structure interaction (FSI) approach, we have evaluated the blood flow characteristics along the diseased aorta, in conjunction with the deformation of the aortic wall. In this study, an idealized geometry of a dissected descending aorta (type B) with two entries has been studied. The values for the diameter of the entry tear were chosen to be 5 mm and 10 mm. Therefore, a total of four conditions were investigated. According to our results, the retrograde flow through the proximal tear is dependent on the size of the distal re-entry and vice versa. Our results revealed that when both entry and re-entry tears are 10 mm in diameter, the flow passes through the true and false lumens with smaller resistance, resulting in a smaller flutter of the intimal flap, and therefore more stable intimal flap. Major oscillation frequencies of 2.5 Hz and 7.4 Hz were observed for the oscillation of the intimal flap, and amplitudes of the waves with higher frequencies were negligible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed SB, Dillon-Murphy D, Figueroa C (2016) Computational study of anatomical risk factors in idealized models of type b aortic dissection. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 52(6):736–745

    Google Scholar 

  • Alimohammadi M, Agu O, Balabani S, Díaz-Zuccarini V (2014) Development of a patient-specific simulation tool to analyse aortic dissections: assessment of mixed patient-specific flow and pressure boundary conditions. Med Eng Phys 36(3):275–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Alimohammadi M, Sherwood JM, Karimpour M, Agu O, Balabani S, Díaz-Zuccarini V (2015) Aortic dissection simulation models for clinical support: fluid-structure interaction vs. rigid wall models. Biomed Eng 14(1):34

    Google Scholar 

  • Alimohammadi M, Pichardo-Almarza C, Agu O, Díaz-Zuccarini V (2016) Development of a patient-specific multi-scale model to understand atherosclerosis and calcification locations: comparison with in vivo data in an aortic dissection. Front Physiol 7:238

    Google Scholar 

  • Alimohammadi M, Pichardo-Almarza C, Agu O, Díaz-Zuccarini V (2017) A multiscale modelling approach to understand atherosclerosis formation: A patient-specific case study in the aortic bifurcation. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 231(5):378–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen BD, Aouad PJ, Burris NS, Rahsepar AA, Jarvis KB, François CJ, Barker AJ, Malaisrie SC, Carr JC, Collins JD et al (2019) Detection and hemodynamic evaluation of flap fenestrations in type b aortic dissection with 4d flow mri: comparison with conventional mri and ct angiography. Radiol Cardiothorac Imag 1(1):e180009

    Google Scholar 

  • Batra P, Bigoni B, Manning J, Aberle DR, Brown K, Hart E, Goldin J (2000) Pitfalls in the diagnosis of thoracic aortic dissection at ct angiography. Radiographics 20(2):309–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäumler K, Vedula V, Sailer AM, Seo J, Chiu P, Mistelbauer G, Chan FP, Fischbein MP, Marsden AL, Fleischmann D (2020) Fluid–structure interaction simulations of patient-specific aortic dissection. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology 1–22

  • Birjiniuk J, Timmins LH, Young M, Leshnower BG, Oshinski JN, Ku DN, Veeraswamy RK (2017) Pulsatile flow leads to intimal flap motion and flow reversal in an in vitro model of type b aortic dissection. Cardiovasc Eng Technol 8(3):378–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Birjiniuk J, Veeraswamy RK, Oshinski JN, Ku DN (2019) Intermediate fenestrations reduce flow reversal in a silicone model of stanford type b aortic dissection. J Biomech 93:101–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Booher AM, Isselbacher EM, Nienaber CA, Trimarchi S, Evangelista A, Montgomery DG, Froehlich JB, Ehrlich MP, Oh JK, Januzzi JL et al (2013) The irad classification system for characterizing survival after aortic dissection. Am J Med 126(8):730-e19

    Google Scholar 

  • Braverman AC (2010) Acute aortic dissection: clinician update. Circulation 122(2):184–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavan A, Lotz J, Oelert F, Galanski M, Haverich A, Karck M (2003) Endoluminal treatment of aortic dissection. Eur Radiol 13(11):2521–2534

    Google Scholar 

  • Demos TC, Posniak HV, Marsan RE (1989) Ct of aortic dissection. Semin Roentgenol 24:22–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Eusanio M, Trimarchi S, Patel HJ, Hutchison S, Suzuki T, Peterson MD, Di Bartolomeo R, Folesani G, Pyeritz RE, Braverman AC et al (2013) Clinical presentation, management, and short-term outcome of patients with type a acute dissection complicated by mesenteric malperfusion: observations from the international registry of acute aortic dissection. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg 145(2):385–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Erbel R, Eggebrecht H (2006) Aortic dimensions and the risk of dissection. Heart 92(1):137–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Erbel R, Oelert H, Meyer J, Puth M, Mohr-Katoly S, Hausmann D, Daniel W, Maffei S, Caruso A, Covino F (1993) Effect of medical and surgical therapy on aortic dissection evaluated by transesophageal echocardiography implications for prognosis and therapy. The european cooperative study group on echocardiography. Circulation 87(5):1604–1615

    Google Scholar 

  • Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C, Bossone E, Bartolomeo R, Eggebrecht H, Evangelista A, Falk V, Frank H, Gaemperli O et al (2014a) The task force for the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases of the european society of cardiology (esc). 2014 esc guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: Document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult. Eur Heart J 35(41):2873–926

    Google Scholar 

  • Erbel R, Aboyans V, Boileau C, Bossone E, Bartolomeo RD, Eggebrecht H, Evangelista A, Falk V, Frank H et al (2014b) 2014 esc guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases: Document covering acute and chronic aortic diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta of the adult the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases of the european society of cardiology (esc). Eur Heart J 35(41):2873–2926

    Google Scholar 

  • Evangelista A, Salas A, Ribera A, Ferreira-González I, Cuellar H, Pineda V, González-Alujas T, Bijnens B, Permanyer-Miralda G, Garcia-Dorado D (2012) Long-term outcome of aortic dissection with patent false lumen: predictive role of entry tear size and location. Circulation 125(25):3133–3141

    Google Scholar 

  • Evangelista A, Galuppo V, Gruosso D, Cuéllar H, Teixidó G, Rodríguez-Palomares J (2014) Role of entry tear size in type b aortic dissection. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 3(4):403

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung YC (1998) Biomechanics: circulation. Shock 9(2):108–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganten MK, Weber TF, von Tengg-Kobligk H, Böckler D, Stiller W, Geisbüsch P, Kauffmann GW, Delorme S, Bock M, Kauczor HU (2009) Motion characterization of aortic wall and intimal flap by ecg-gated ct in patients with chronic b-dissection. Eur J Radiol 72(1):146–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Gijsen FJ, van de Vosse FN, Janssen J (1999) The influence of the non-newtonian properties of blood on the flow in large arteries: steady flow in a carotid bifurcation model. J Biomech 32(6):601–608

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagan PG, Nienaber CA, Isselbacher EM, Bruckman D, Karavite DJ, Russman PL, Evangelista A, Fattori R, Suzuki T, Oh JK et al (2000) The international registry of acute aortic dissection (irad): new insights into an old disease. JAMA 283(7):897–903

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartnell GG, Gates J (2005) Aortic fenestration: a why, when, and how-to guide. Radiographics 25(1):175–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes TJ, Liu WK, Zimmermann TK (1981) Lagrangian-eulerian finite element formulation for incompressible viscous flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 29(3):329–349

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Inoue T, Watanabe S, Sakurada H, Ono K, Urano M, Hijikata Y, Saito I, Masuda Y (2000) Evaluation of flow volume and flow patterns in the patent false lumen of chronic aortic dissections using velocity-encoded cine magnetic resonance imaging. Jpn Circ J 64(10):760–764

    Google Scholar 

  • Januzzi JL, Eagle KA, Cooper JV, Fang J, Sechtem U, Myrmel T, Evangelista A, Oh JK, Llovet A, O’Gara PT et al (2005) Acute aortic dissection presenting with congestive heart failure: results from the international registry of acute aortic dissection. J Am Coll Cardiol 46(4):733–735

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis K, Pruijssen JT, Son AY, Allen BD, Soulat G, Vali A, Barker AJ, Hoel AW, Eskandari MK, Malaisrie SC et al (2019) Parametric hemodynamic 4d flow mri maps for the characterization of chronic thoracic descending aortic dissection. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

  • Markl M, Frydrychowicz A, Kozerke S, Hope M, Wieben O (2012) 4d flow mri. J Magn Reson Imaging 36(5):1015–1036

    Google Scholar 

  • Massabuau P (2006) Transesophageal echocardiography for diagnosis and treatment of aortic diseases. In: Thoracic aortic diseases, Springer, pp 33–53

  • Menichini C, Xu XY (2016) Mathematical modeling of thrombus formation in idealized models of aortic dissection: initial findings and potential applications. J Math Biol 73(5):1205–1226

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr-Kahaly S, Erbel R, Rennollet H, Wittlich N, Drexler M, Oelert H, Meyer J (1989) Ambulatory follow-up of aortic dissection by transesophageal two-dimensional and color-coded doppler echocardiography. Circulation 80(1):24–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Neidlin M, Sonntag SJ, Schmitz-Rode T, Steinseifer U, Kaufmann TA (2016) Investigation of hemodynamics during cardiopulmonary bypass: a multiscale multiphysics fluid-structure-interaction study. Med Eng Phys 38(4):380–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong C, Kabinejadian F, Xiong F, Wong Y, Toma M, Nguyen Y, Chua K, Cui F, Ho P, Leo H (2019a) Pulsatile flow investigation in development of thoracic aortic aneurysm: an in-vitro validated fluid structure interaction analysis. J Appl Fluid Mech 12(6):1855–1872

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong C, Xiong F, Kabinejadian F, Kumar GP, Cui F, Chen G, Ho P, Leo H (2019b) Hemodynamic analysis of a novel stent graft design with slit perforations in thoracic aortic aneurysm. J Biomech 85:210–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterss S, Mansour AM, Ross JA, Vaitkeviciute I, Charilaou P, Dumfarth J, Fang H, Ziganshin BA, Rizzo JA, Adeniran AJ et al (2016) Changing pathology of the thoracic aorta from acute to chronic dissection: literature review and insights. J Am Coll Cardiol 68(10):1054–1065

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirola S, Guo B, Menichini C, Saitta S, Fu W, Dong Z, Xu XY (2019) 4-d flow mri-based computational analysis of blood flow in patient-specific aortic dissection. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 66(12):3411–3419

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghavan M, Vorp DA (2000) Toward a biomechanical tool to evaluate rupture potential of abdominal aortic aneurysm: identification of a finite strain constitutive model and evaluation of its applicability. J Biomech 33(4):475–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivlin RS, Saunders D (1951) Large elastic deformations of isotropic materials vii. experiments on the deformation of rubber. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci 243(865):251–288

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rudenick PA, Bordone M, Bijnens BH, Soudah E, Oñate E, Garcia-Dorado D, Evangelista A (2010) Influence of tear configuration on false and true lumen haemodynamics in type b aortic dissection. In: 2010 annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology, IEEE, pp 2509–2512

  • Rudenick PA, Bijnens BH, García-Dorado D, Evangelista A (2013) An in vitro phantom study on the influence of tear size and configuration on the hemodynamics of the lumina in chronic type b aortic dissections. J Vasc Surg 57(2):464–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudenick PA, Bijnens BH, Segers P, García-Dorado D, Evangelista A (2015) Assessment of wall elasticity variations on intraluminal haemodynamics in descending aortic dissections using a lumped-parameter model. PLoS ONE 10(4):e0124011

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudenick PA, Segers P, Pineda V, Cuellar H, García-Dorado D, Evangelista A, Bijnens BH (2017) False lumen flow patterns and their relation with morphological and biomechanical characteristics of chronic aortic dissections. computational model compared with magnetic resonance imaging measurements. PLoS ONE 12(1):e0170888

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryzhakov P, Soudah E, Dialami N (2019) Computational modeling of the fluid flow and the flexible intimal flap in type b aortic dissection via a monolithic arbitrary lagrangian/eulerian fluid-structure interaction model. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng e3239

  • Shi Y, Zhu M, Chang Y, Qiao H, Liu Y (2016) The risk of stanford type-a aortic dissection with different tear size and location: a numerical study. Biomed Eng 15(2):128

    Google Scholar 

  • Soudah E, Rossi R, Idelsohn S, Oñate E (2014) A reduced-order model based on the coupled 1d–3d finite element simulations for an efficient analysis of hemodynamics problems. Comput Mech 54(4):1013–1022

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Soudah E, Rudenick P, Bordone M, Bijnens B, García-Dorado D, Evangelista A, Oñate E (2015) Validation of numerical flow simulations against in vitro phantom measurements in different type b aortic dissection scenarios. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 18(8):805–815

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinelli D, Benedetto F, Donato R, Piffaretti G, Marrocco-Trischitta MM, Patel HJ, Eagle KA, Trimarchi S (2018) Current evidence in predictors of aortic growth and events in acute type b aortic dissection. J Vasc Surg 68(6):1925–1935

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankovic Z, Allen BD, Garcia J, Jarvis KB, Markl M (2014) 4d flow imaging with mri. Cardiovasc Diagnos Therapy 4(2):173

    Google Scholar 

  • Strotzer M, Aebert H, Lenhart M, Nitz W, Wild T, Manke C, Völk M, Feuerbach S (2000) Morphology and hemodynamics in dissection of the descending aorta: assessment with mr imaging. Acta Radiol 41(6):594–600

    Google Scholar 

  • Truesdell C, Noll W (2004) The non-linear field theories of mechanics. In: The non-linear field theories of mechanics, Springer, pp 1–579

  • Tsai T, Trimarchi S, Nienaber C (2009) Acute aortic dissection: perspectives from the international registry of acute aortic dissection (irad). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 37(2):149–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai TT, Schlicht MS, Khanafer K, Bull JL, Valassis DT, Williams DM, Berguer R, Eagle KA (2008) Tear size and location impacts false lumen pressure in an ex vivo model of chronic type b aortic dissection. J Vasc Surg 47(4):844–851

    Google Scholar 

  • Womersley JR (1955) Method for the calculation of velocity, rate of flow and viscous drag in arteries when the pressure gradient is known. J Physiol 127(3):553–563

    Google Scholar 

  • van Wyk S, Prahl Wittberg L, Bulusu KV, Fuchs L, Plesniak MW (2015) Non-newtonian perspectives on pulsatile blood-analog flows in a 180 curved artery model. Phys Fluids 27(7):071901

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang S, Li X, Chao B, Wu L, Cheng Z, Duan Y, Wu D, Zhan Y, Chen J, Liu B et al (2014) Abdominal aortic intimal flap motion characterization in acute aortic dissection: assessed with retrospective ecg-gated thoracoabdominal aorta dual-source ct angiography. PloS one 9(2)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge NUS Graduate School for Integrative Sciences and Engineering (NGS) for funding the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hwa Liang Leo.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Keramati, H., Birgersson, E., Ho, J.P. et al. The effect of the entry and re-entry size in the aortic dissection: a two-way fluid–structure interaction simulation. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 19, 2643–2656 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-020-01361-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-020-01361-0

Keywords

Navigation