Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mechanoregulation modeling of bone healing in realistic fracture geometries

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In bone fracture healing, new tissue gradually forms, ossifies, and eventually remodels itself to restore mechanical stiffness and strength across injury site. Mechanical strain at the fracture site has been implicated in controlling the process of healing and numerical mechanoregulation models with strain-based fuzzy logic rules have been applied to simulate bone healing for simple fracture geometries. However, many of these simplified models cannot capture in vivo observations such as delays in healing with torsional instability or differences in healing rate between different fracture types. Accordingly, the purpose of this work was to apply a fuzzy logic mechanoregulation fracture healing simulation technique to 3D models representing a range of clinically inspired fracture geometries with intramedullary nail fixation and multiaxial loading conditions. The models predicted that the rate of healing depends on the geometry of the fracture and that all fracture types experience a small healing delay with torsional instability. The results also indicated that when realistic torsional loading and fixator mechanics are included, previously published strain-based rules for tissue destruction lead to simulated nonunions that would not be expected in vivo. This suggested that fracture healing may be more robust to distortional strain than has been previously reported and that fuzzy logic models may require parameter tuning to correctly capture clinically relevant healing. The strengths of this study are that it includes fracture morphology effects, realistic implant mechanics, and an exploratory adaptation of the upper distortional strain threshold. These findings may help future researchers extend these methods into clinical fracture healing prediction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ament C, Hofer EP (2000) A fuzzy logic model of fracture healing. J Biomech 33(8):961–968

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonova E, Le TK, Burge R, Mershon J (2013) Tibia shaft fractures: costly burden of nonunions. BMC Musculoskelet Disorders 14(1):42

    Google Scholar 

  • Attal R, Maestri V, Doshi HK, Onder U, Smekal V, Blauth M, Schmoelz W (2014) The influence of distal locking on the need for fibular plating in intramedullary nailing of distal metaphyseal tibiofibular fractures. Bone Joint J 96(3):385–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Augat P, Burger J, Schorlemmer S, Henke T, Peraus M, Claes L (2003) Shear movement at the fracture site delays healing in a diaphyseal fracture model. J Orthop Res 21(6):1011–1017

    Google Scholar 

  • Augat P, Claes L, Eckert-Hübner K (2002) The effect of mechanical stability on local vascularization and tissue differentiation in callus healing. J Orthop Res 20(5):1099–1105

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop JA, Palanca AA, Bellino MJ, Lowenberg DW (2012) Assessment of Compromised Fracture Healing. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 20(5):273–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop N, Rhijn M, Tami I, Corveleijn R, Schneider E, Ito K (2006) Shear does not necessarily inhibit bone healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 443:307–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottlang M, Lesser M, Koerber J, Doornink J, Rechenberg B, Augat P, Fitzpatrick D, Madey S, Marsh J (2010) Far cortical locking can improve healing of fractures stabilized with locking plates. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:1652–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottlang M, Tsai S, Bliven EK, Von Rechenberg B, Klein K, Augat P, Henschel J, Fitzpatrick DC, Madey SM (2016) Dynamic stabilization with active locking plates delivers faster, stronger, and more symmetric fracture-healing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 98(6):466–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, Court-Brown CM, Tornetta P III (2002) Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults, 5th edn. In: LWW

  • Carter D, Hayes W (1977) The compressive behavior of bone as two phase porous structure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 59:954–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen G, Niemeyer F, Wehner T, Simon U, Schuetz M, Pearcy M, Claes L (2009) Simulation of the nutrient supply in fracture healing. J Biomech 42:2575–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Claes L, Augat P, Suger G, Wilke HJ (1997) Influence of size and stability of the osteotomy gap on the success of fracture healing. J Orthop Res 15(4):577–584

    Google Scholar 

  • Claes LE, Heigele CA (1999) Magnitudes of local stress and strain along bony surfaces predict the course and type of fracture healing. J Biomech 32(3):255–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Comiskey D, MacDonald BJ, McCartney WT, Synnott K, O’Byrne J (2013) Predicting the external formation of callus tissues in oblique bone fractures: Idealised and clinical case studies. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 12(6):1277–1282

    Google Scholar 

  • Dailey H, Daly C, Galbraith J, Harty J (2013) The Flexible Axial Stimulation (FAST) intramedullary nail provides interfragmentary micromotion and enhanced torsional stability. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 28(5):579–585

    Google Scholar 

  • Dailey H, Schwarzenberg P, Daly C, Boran S, Maher M, Harty J (2019) Virtual mechanical testing based on low-dose computed tomography scans for tibial fracture: a pilot study of prediction of time to union and comparison with subjective outcomes scoring. J Bone Joint Surg Am 101:1193–1202

    Google Scholar 

  • Dailey HL, Ph D, Daly CJ, Glass-hardenbergh A (2015) Mechanical origins of fracture nonunion: implant tests and finite element models of callus strains. In: Biomedical Engineering Society annual meeting

  • Dailey HL, Wu KA, Wu P-S, McQueen MM, Court-Brown CM (2018) Tibial fracture nonunion and time to healing after reamed intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma 32(7):e263–e269

    Google Scholar 

  • Doblaré M, García J, Gómez-Benito MJ (2004) Modelling bone tissue fracture and healing: a review. Eng Fract Mech 71:1809–1840

    Google Scholar 

  • Duda G, Eckert-Hübner K, Sokiranski R, Kreutner A, Miller R, Claes L (1998) Analysis of inter-fragmentary movement as a function of musculoskeletal loading conditions in sheep. J Biomech 31:201–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Epari DR, Kassi JP, Schell H, Duda GN (2007) Timely fracture-healing requires optimization of axial fixation stability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(7):1575–1585

    Google Scholar 

  • Fong K, Truong V, Foote CJ, Petrisor B, Williams D, Ristevski B, Sprague S, Bhandari M (2013) Predictors of nonunion and reoperation in patients with fractures of the tibia: an observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disorders 14(103):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Geris L, Gerisch A, Vander Sloten J, Weiner R, Oosterwyck H (2008) Angiogenesis in bone fracture healing: a bioregulatory model. J Theor Biol 251:137–58

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Benito MJ, Garcia Aznar JM, Kuiper J, Doblaré M (2006) A 3d computational simulation of fracture callus formation: influence of the stiffness of the external fixator. J Biomech Eng 128:290–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Höntzsch D, Schaser K-D, Hofmann GO, Pohlemann T, Hem ES, Rothenbach E, Krettek C, Attal R (2014) Evaluation of the effectiveness of the angular stable locking system in patients with distal tibial fractures treated with intramedullary nailing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(22):1889–1897

    Google Scholar 

  • Inderchand M, Liu Y, Epari D, Roschger P, Schell H, Fratzl P, Duda G (2009) Spatial and temporal variations of mechanical properties and mineral content of the external callus during bone healing. Bone 45:185–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaksson H (2012) Recent advances in mechanobiological modeling of bone regeneration. Mech Res Commun 42:22–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaksson H, van Donkelaar CC, Huiskes R, Ito K (2006) Corroboration of mechanoregulatory algorithms for tissue differentiation during fracture healing: comparison with in vivo results. J Orthop Res 24(5):898–907

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaspar K, Schell H, Seebeck P, Thompson MS, Schütz M, Haas NP, Duda GN (2005) Angle stable locking reduces interfragmentary movements and promotes healing after unreamed nailing: Study of a displaced osteotomy model in sheep tibiae. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(9I):2028–2037

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellam JF, Meinberg EG, Agel J, Karam MD, Roberts CS (2018) Introduction. J Orthop Trauma 32(1):S1–S10

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacroix D, Prendergast PJ (2002) A mechano-regulation model for tissue differentiation during fracture healing: analysis of gap size and loading. J Biomech 35(9):1163–1171

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie EJ, Morris JA, Jurkovich GJ, Yasui Y, Cushing BM, Burgess AR, DeLateur BJ, McAndrew MP, Swiontkowski MF (1998) Return to work following injury: the role of economic, social, and job-related factors. Am J Public Health 88(11):1630–1637

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsell R, Einhorn T (2011) The biology of fracture healing. Injury 42:551–5

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Halloran K, Coale M, Costales T, Zerhusen T, Castillo RC, Nascone JW, O’Toole RV (2016) Will my tibial fracture heal? Predicting nonunion at the time of definitive fixation based on commonly available variables. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(6):1385–1395

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietsch M, Niemeyer F, Simon U, Ignatius A, Urban K (2018) Modelling the fracture-healing process as a moving-interface problem using an interface-capturing approach. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 21:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast P, Huiskes R, Søballe K (1997) Biophysical stimuli on cells during tissue differentiation at implant interfaces. J Biomech 30(6):539–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhinelander FW (1974) Tibial blood supply in relation to fracture healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 105(1):34–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro F, Gomez-Benito MJ, Folgado J, Fernandes P, Garcia Aznar JM (2015) In silico mechano-chemical model of bone healing for the regeneration of critical defects: the effect of bmp-2. PLoS ONE 10:e0127722

    Google Scholar 

  • Schell H, Epari DR, Kassi JP, Bragulla H, Bail HJ, Duda GN (2005) The course of bone healing is influenced by the initial shear fixation stability. J Orthop Res 23(5):1022–1028

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzenberg P, Maher M, Harty J, Dailey H (2019) Virtual structural analysis of tibial fracture healing from low-dose clinical CT scans. J Biomech 83:49–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Shefelbine SJ, Augat P, Claes L, Simon U (2005) Trabecular bone fracture healing simulation with finite element analysis and fuzzy logic. J Biomech 38(12):2440–2450

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon U, Augat P, Utz M, Claes L (2011) A numerical model of the fracture healing process that describes tissue development and revascularisation. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 14(1):79–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner M, Claes L, Ignatius A, Niemeyer F, Simon U, Wehner T (2013) Prediction of fracture healing under axial loading, shear loading and bending is possible using distortional and dilatational strains as determining mechanical stimuli. J R Soc Interface 10(86):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner M, Claes L, Ignatius A, Simon U, Wehner T (2014a) Disadvantages of interfragmentary shear on fracture healing—mechanical insights through numerical simulation. J Orthop Res 32(7):865–872

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner M, Claes L, Ignatius A, Simon U, Wehner T (2014b) Numerical simulation of callus healing for optimization of fracture fixation stiffness. PLoS ONE 9(7):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Tay W-H, de Steiger R, Richardson M, Gruen R, Balogh ZJ (2014) Health outcomes of delayed union and nonunion of femoral and tibial shaft fractures. Injury 45(10):1653–1658

    Google Scholar 

  • Wähnert D, Gehweiler D (2017) Complications of intramedullary nailing-evolution of treatment. Injury 48S:S59–S63

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Yang N (2018) Three-dimensional computational model simulating the fracture healing process with both biphasic poroelastic finite element analysis and fuzzy logic control. Sci Rep 8:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner T, Claes L, Niemeyer F, Nolte D, Simon U (2010) Influence of the fixation stability on the healing time—a numerical study of a patient-specific fracture healing process. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 25:606–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner T, Steiner M, Ignatius A, Claes L, Aegerter CM (2014) Prediction of the time course of callus stiffness as a function of mechanical parameters in experimental rat fracture healing studies–a numerical study. PLoS ONE 9(12):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson C, Schutz M, Epari D (2015) Effects of strain artefacts arising from a pre-defined callus domain in models of bone healing mechanobiology. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 14(5):1129–41

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There are no funding sources to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tianyi Ren.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest with the work contained in this manuscript. In keeping with ICCME guidelines and the adopted policy of the Orthopaedic Research Society, of which both authors are members, we make the following complete disclosure: TR - No conflicts. HLD - 3c/4/6 - OrthoXel, DAC (Cork, Ireland), 9 - Orthopaedic Research Society (ORS) International Section for Fracture Repair (ISFR) Communications Committee Chair.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ren, T., Dailey, H.L. Mechanoregulation modeling of bone healing in realistic fracture geometries. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 19, 2307–2322 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-020-01340-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-020-01340-5

Keywords

Navigation