Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Accessibility evaluation of top university websites: a comparative study of Kyrgyzstan, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Turkey

  • Communication
  • Published:
Universal Access in the Information Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is important that university websites and services offered through their sites are used effectively, efficiently and satisfactorily by the whole target group of the university, including disabled users. However, universities in many countries are still unable to meet the criteria for web accessibility. This study aimed to test the websites of the top universities in Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan and Turkey using automated assessment tools. The results showed that university websites are more popular in Turkey, and in Turkish universities developers pay more attention to the performance of websites, followed by websites of Azerbaijani, Kyrgyz and Kazakh universities. The majority of the university websites in the study did not meet the WCAG 2.0 accessibility criteria. Only two Kyrgyz and two Kazakh university websites attained conformance level A, and only three, one Kyrgyz and two Kazakh, achieved accessibility conformance level AAA. Based on the results, it was determined that universities included in the present study need to devote more effort to making their websites more accessible for their users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. 4icu: International Colleges and Universities. World University Rankings & Reviews | 4icu.org. http://www.4icu.org/. Acccessed 01 Nov (2016) (n.d.)

  2. Ahmi, A., Mohamad, R.: Web accessibility of the Malaysian Public University websites. International Conference on E-Commerce (ICoEC), pp. 171–177, 20–22 Oct 2015, Sarawak, Malaysia (2015)

  3. Aizpurua, A., Arrue, M., Vigo, M.: Prejudices, memories, expectations and confidence influence experienced accessibility on the Web. Comput. Hum. Behav. 51, 152–160 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alexander, D.: How accessible are university websites? http://ausweb.scu.edu.au/aw03/papers/alexander3/paper.html (2003)

  5. Alexander, D., Rippon S.: University website accessibility revisited. http://ausweb.scu.edu.au/aw07/papers/refereed/alexander/paper.html (2007)

  6. Aziz, M.A., Isa, W.A.R.W.M., Nordin, N.: Assessing the accessibility and usability of Malaysia higher education website. In: International Conference on User Science Engineering (i-USEr), pp. 203–208 (2010)

  7. Bradbard, D.A., Peters, C., Caneva, Y.: Web accessibility policies at land-grant universities. Int. Higher Educ. 13, 258–266 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cooper, J.: Introducing LinkMiner by Point Blank SEO. http://pointblankseo.com/linkminer. Accessed 05 Jan 2017 (2015)

  9. Doulani, A., Hariri, N., Rashidi, A.: Analysis of Iranian and British university websites by world wide web consortium. J. Scientometr. Res. 2, 74–79 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Espadinha, C., Pereira, L.M., Da Silva, F.M., Lopes, J.B.: Accessibility of Portuguese Public Universities’ sites. Disabil. Rehabil. 33(6), 475–485 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fichten, C.S., Asuncion, J.V., Nguyen, M.N., Budd, J., Amsel, R.: The POSITIVES Scale: development and validation of a measure of how well the information and communication technology needs of students with disabilities are being met. J. Postsecond. Educ. Disabil. 23(2), 137–154 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Floyd, K.S., Santiago, J.: The state of Website accessibility in higher education. In: Southern Association for Information Systems Conference (2007)

  13. Fuertes, J.L., Gutiérrez, E., Martínez, L.: Developing hera-ffx for WCAG 2.0. International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility, p. 3. ACM (2011)

  14. Fuglerud, K., Røssvoll, T.: An evaluation of web-based voting usability and accessibility. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 11(4), 1–15 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gay, G., Li, C.Q.: AChecker: open, interactive, customizable, web accessibility checking. In: International Cross Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A), p. 23. ACM (2010)

  16. Google: Finding more high-quality sites in search. Google Official Blog at http://googleblog.blogspot.fi/2011/02/finding-more-high-quality-sites-in.html. Accessed 08 Aug 2015 (2011)

  17. Gopinath, S., Senthooran, V., Lojenaa, N., Kartheeswaran, T.: Usability and accessibility analysis of selected government websites in Sri Lanka. In Region 10 Symposium (TENSYMP), 2016 IEEE, pp. 394–398 (2016)

  18. Guner, H., Inal, Y. (2015). The effect of banner location on banner recognition in a Turkish government website: an eye tracking study. HCI International 2015, pp. 65–72, Los Angeles, USA

  19. Hashemian, B.J.: Analyzing web accessibility in Finnish higher education. ACM SIGACCESS Access. Comput. 101, 8–16 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Inal, Y., Ozen-Cinar, N., Cagiltay, K.: Kamu internet sitelerinde yer alan arama alanlarının kullanılabilirliği ve buna yönelik kullanıcı davranışlarının belirlenmesi. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi 9(1), 41–54 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ismail, A., Kuppusamy, K.S.: Accessibility of Indian universities’ homepages: an exploratory study. J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci. (2016)

  22. Ismailova, R., Inal, Y.: Web site accessibility and quality in use: a comparative study of government Web sites in Kyrgyzstan, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Turkey. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. (2016). doi:10.1007/s10209-016-0490-z

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ismailova, R., Kimsanova, G.: Universities of the Kyrgyz Republic on the Web: accessibility and usability. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. (2016). doi:10.1007/s10209-016-0481-0

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jange, S.: Library websites of universities in Karnataka State: an evaluative study. J. Adv. Library Inf. Sci. 3(3), 195–202 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kane, S.K., Shulman, J.A., Shockley, T.J., Ladner, R.E.: A web accessibility report card for top international university Web sites. W4A2007, May 07–08, Banff, Canada (2007)

  26. Kaur, S., Kaur, K., Kaur, P.: An empirical performance evaluation of Universities Website. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 146(15), 10–16 (2016)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Kesswani, N., Kumar, S.: Accessibility analysis of websites of educational institutions. Perspect. Sci. 8, 210–212 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Korbel, D.M., Lucia, J.H., Wenzel, C.M., Anderson, B.G.: Collaboration strategies to facilitate successful transition of students with disabilities in a changing higher education environment. New Dir. Higher Educ. 154, 17–25 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kurt, S.: The accessibility of university web sites: the case of Turkish universities. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 10(1), 101–110 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kurt, S.: Accessibility of Turkish University Web sites. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. (2016). doi:10.1007/s10209-016-0468-x

    Google Scholar 

  31. Maisak, R., Brown, J.: Web accessibility on Thai higher education Websites. In: ICSEA 2014: The Ninth International Conference on Software Engineering Advances, pp. 645–650 (2014)

  32. Menascé, D.A.: Load testing of web sites. IEEE Internet Comput. 6(4), 70–74 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mirri, S., Muratori, L.A., Salomoni, P.: Monitoring accessibility: large scale evaluations at a geo political level. In: 13th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp. 163–170. ACM (2011)

  34. Okada, H., Arakawa, H., Kondo, T.: Comparison of web accessibility within Japanese educational institution websites. In: ICROS-SICE International Joint Conference, Aug 18–21, Fukuoka International Congress Center, Japan (2009)

  35. QS Top Universities: QS World University Rankings 2016. http://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/2016 Accessed 01 Nov 2016

  36. Rowland, C., Whiting, J., Smith, J.: What do you need to create and maintain web accessibility? In: Accessible Instructional Design. Published online: 04 Dec 2015, pp. 13–45 (2015)

  37. SimilarWeb.com-Competitive Intelligence Tool. http://www.similarweb.com/ (2016). Accessed 12 Dec 2016 (n.d.)

  38. Solovieva, T.I., Bock, J.M.: Monitoring for accessibility and university Websites: Meeting the needs of people with disabilities. J. Postsecond. Educ. Disabil. 27(2), 113–127 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Speicher, M., Both, A., Gaedke, M.: Ensuring web interface quality through usability-based split testing. In: S. Casteleyn, G. Rossi, M. Winckler (eds) International Conference on Web Engineering, Vol. 8541, pp. 93–110. LNCS, Springer (2014)

  40. Times Higher Education: World University Rankings. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2017/world-ranking. Accessed 01 Nov 2016 (2016)

  41. W3C WAI: Introduction to web accessibility. http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/accessibility.php (2005)

  42. Webometrics: Welcome to Ranking Web of Universities | Ranking Web of Universities. http://www.webometrics.info/en. Accessed 01 Nov 2016 (n.d.)

  43. Youngblood, N.E.: Revisiting Alabama state website accessibility. Gov. Inf. Quart. 31(3), 476–487 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zaphiris, P., Ellis, R.D.: Website usability and content accessibility of the top USA universities. WebNet Conference, Orlando, FL, USA (2001)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kyrgyz-Turkish Manas University, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan

    Rita Ismailova

  2. Department of Information Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Atilim University, Ankara, Turkey

    Yavuz Inal

Authors
  1. Rita Ismailova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yavuz Inal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yavuz Inal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ismailova, R., Inal, Y. Accessibility evaluation of top university websites: a comparative study of Kyrgyzstan, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Turkey. Univ Access Inf Soc 17, 437–445 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0541-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0541-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation