Skip to main content
Log in

Prevalence and treatment costs of type 2 diabetes in Germany and the effects of social and demographical differences

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The European Journal of Health Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Treatment costs for type 2 diabetes account for a substantial amount of the expenses for statutory health care funds. Within a study sample of the year 2005, 6.8 % of the insured were being treated for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Compared to the non-diabetic insured in the sample, patients included more males and older persons. Employed diabetics also showed lower mean gross salary when compared to the non-diabetic employed of the sample. In 2007, their mean costs for in- and outpatient care and drug prescriptions amounted to 2,622 Euros per patient. The impacts of social and demographical patient characteristics on total treatment costs were measured with a multiple linear regression model, controlling for the hypoglycemic therapy of the patient. Here, the impact of age, gender and intensive insulin therapy became evident. A higher annual salary had a negative, yet non-significant, effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Köster, I., von Ferber, L., Ihle, P., et al.: The cost burden of diabetes mellitus: the evidence from Germany—the CoDiM Study. Diabetologia 49, 1498–1504 (2006)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lindner, T.H., Wanner, C.: Typ-2-Diabetes-mellitus—eine durch die Umwelt modifizierbare Erbkrankheit. In: Meinertz, T., Rösen, P., Ziegler, D. (eds.) Diabetes und Herz, pp. 75–97. Steinkopff, Darmstadt (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. UK Prospective Diabetes Study: UKPDS) Group: intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type-2 diabetes (UKPDS 33. Lancet 352, 837–853 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shichiri, M., Kishikawa, H., Ohkubo, Y., Wake, N.: Long-term results of the Kumamoto Study on optimal diabetes control in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 23(Suppl. 2), 1–29 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gaede, P., Vedel, P., Larsen, N., et al.: Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 348, 383–393 (2003)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Abraira, C., Duckworth, W.C., Moritz, T.: Glycaemic separation and risk factor control in the veterans affairs diabetes trial: an interim report. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 11, 150–156 (2009)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ott, P., Benke, I., Stelzer, J., et al.: “Diabetes in Germany” (DIG) Studie. Dtsch. Med. Wochenschr. 134, 291–297 (2009)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Scanlan, M.C., Blond, L.: Adherence to practice guidelines for people with diabetes mellitus. In: Feinglos, M.N., Bethel, M.A. (eds.) Type 2 diabetes mellitus, pp. 235–249. Humana, Totowa (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Vogel, H., Kulzer, B.: Patientenschulung bei Diabetes mellitus. In: Petermann, F., Lecheler, J. (eds.) Patientenschulung, pp. 59–78. Dustri, Munich (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kulzer, B., Albus, C., Herpertz, S., et al.: Psychosoziales und Diabetes mellitus. Diabet 3(Suppl. 2), 168–174 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Geyer, S.: Die Bestimmung der sozioökomischen Position in Prozessdaten und ihre Verwendung in Sekundärdatenanalysen. In: Swart, E., Ihle, P. (eds.) Routinedaten im Gesundheitswesen, pp. 203–213. Verlag Hans Huber, Bern (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mielck, A.: Soziale Ungleichheit und Gesundheit. Verlag Hans Huber, Bern (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. BMGS P25: GKV-Statistik KM6. http://www.bmg.bund.de/cln_160/nn_1168248/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Statistiken/Gesetzliche-Krankenversicherung/Mitglieder-und-Versicherte/2005-km6-lang-pdf.html (2005). Accessed 30 June 2009

  14. Statistisches Bundesamt: Pressemitteilung Nr. 458 vom 14.11.2007. http://www.destatis.de/jetspeed/portal/cms/Sites/destatis/Internet/DE/Presse/pm/2007/11/PD07__458__231,templateId=renderPrint.psml (2007). Accessed 18 Jan 2011

  15. Federal Council of Germany: Verordnung über maßgebende Rechengrößen der Sozialversicherung für 2005, Drucksache 784/04. Bundesanzeiger, Köln (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Von Ferber, L., Köster, I., Hauner, H.: Medical costs of diabetic complications, total costs and excess costs by age and type of treatment, results of the German CoDIM Study. Exp. Clin. Endocrinol. Diabetes 115, 97–104 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. German Institute for Medical Documentation (DIMDI): ICD-10-GM. Videel, Cologne (2010)

  18. Fricke, G., Günther, J., Zawinell, A.: ATC-Index mit DDD-Angaben für den deutschen Arzneimittelmarkt. WIdO, Bonn (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Matthaei, S., Bierwirth, R., Fritsche, A., et al.: Medikamentöse antihyperglykämische Therapie des Diabetes mellitus Typ 2. Diabetes. Stoffwechse. 4, 32–64 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Giersiepen, K., Pohlabeln, H., Egidi, G., et al.: Die ICD-Kodierqualität für Diagnosen in der ambulanten Versorgung. Bundesgesundheitsbl. Gesundheitsforsch. Gesundheitsschutz 50, 1028–1038 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hauner, H., Köster, I., Von Ferber, L.: Prävalenz des Diabetes mellitus in Deutschland 1998–2001. Dtsch. Med. Wochenschr. 128, 2632–2638 (2003)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shaw, J.E., Sicree, R.A., Zimmet, P.Z.: Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 87, 4–14 (2010)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Stock, S.A., Redaelli, M., Wendland, G., et al.: Diabetes prevalence and the costs of illness in Germany: a study evaluating statutory health insurance in Germany. Diabet. Med. 23, 299–305 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Helmert, U., Janka, H.U., Strube, H.: Epidemiologische Befunde zur Häufigkeit des Diabetes mellitus in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1984 bis 1991. Diabetes. Stoffwechse. 3(271–277), 429–433 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hauner, H.: Verbreitung des Diabetes mellitus in Deutschland. Dtsch. Med. Wochenschr. 123(24), 777–782 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Krishnan, S., Cozier, Y., Rosenberg, L., et al.: Socioeconomic status and incidence of type 2 diabetes: results from the Black Women’s Health Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. (2010). doi:10.1093/aje/kwp443

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Robbins, J.M., Vaccarino, V., Zhang, H., et al.: Socioeconomic status and type 2 diabetes in African American and non-Hispanic white women and men: evidence from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am. J. Public Health 91(1), 76–83 (2001)

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rathmann, W., Haastert, B., Icks, A., et al.: Health inequalities, sex differences in the associations of socioeconomic status with undiagnosed diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance in the elderly population, the KORA Survey 2000. Eur. J. Public Health 15(6), 627–633 (2005)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Robert Koch Institut: Gesundheit in Deutschland. Statistisches Bundesamt, Berlin (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Geyer, S., Hemström, Ö., Peter, R., et al.: Education, income and occupational class cannot be used interchangeably in social epidemiology. Empirical evidence against a common practice. J.Epidemiol.Commun. Health (JECH) 60, 804–810 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. T. Sittig.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sittig, D.T., Friedel, H. & Wasem, J. Prevalence and treatment costs of type 2 diabetes in Germany and the effects of social and demographical differences. Eur J Health Econ 16, 305–311 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-014-0575-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-014-0575-7

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation