Skip to main content
Log in

A Mouse Model Validates the Utility of Electrocochleography in Verifying Endolymphatic Hydrops

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Endolymphatic hydrops (ELH) is a disorder of the inner ear that causes tinnitus, vertigo, and hearing loss. An elevated ratio of the summating potential (SP) to the action potential (AP) measured by electrocochleography has long been considered to be the electrophysiological correlate of ELH-related clinical conditions, such as Meniere’s disease, but in vivo confirmation and correlation between an elevated SP/AP ratio and ELH has not yet been possible. Confirming this relationship will be important to show that elevated SP/AP ratio is indeed diagnostic of ELH. Here, we sought to confirm that an elevated SP/AP ratio is associated with ELH and test the hypothesis that severity of ELH and hearing loss would also correlate with the SP/AP ratio in vivo using the Phex Hyp-Duk /Y mouse model of postnatal ELH. In addition, we describe a minimally invasive approach for electrocochleography in mice. Auditory brainstem responses and electrocochleography data were collected from controls and Phex Hyp-Duk/Y mutants at postnatal day 21 and the mice (all male) were euthanized immediately for cochlear histology. Our results show that (1) the SP/AP ratio was significantly elevated in mice with histological ELH compared to controls, (2) the SP/AP ratio was not correlated with the severity of histological ELH or hearing loss, and (3) the severity of hearing loss correlated with the severity of histological ELH. Our study demonstrates that an elevated SP/AP ratio is diagnostic of ELH and that the severity of hearing loss is a better predictor of the severity of ELH than is the SP/AP ratio.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

FIG. 1
FIG. 2
FIG. 3
FIG. 4
FIG. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-momani MO, Ferraro JA, Gajewski BJ, Ator G (2009) Improved sensitivity of electrocochleography in the diagnosis of Meniere’s disease. Int J Audiol 48:811–819. doi:10.3109/14992020903019338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arenberg IK, Marovitz WF, Shambaugh GE (1970) The role of the endolymphatic sac in the pathogenesis of endolymphatic hydrops in man. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 275:1–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Belal A, Ylikoski J (1980) Pathologic significance of Meniere’s symptom complex. A histopathologic and electron microscopic study. Am J Otolaryngol 1:275–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Bewick V, Cheek L, Ball J (2004) Statistics review 13: receiver operating characteristic curves. Crit Care 8:508–512. doi:10.1186/cc3000

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bixenstine PJ, Maniglia MP, Vasanji A et al (2008) Spiral ganglion degeneration patterns in endolymphatic hydrops. Laryngoscope 118:1217–1223. doi:10.1097/MLG.0b013e31816ba9cd

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell KC, Faloon KM, Rybak LP (1993) Noninvasive electrodes for electrocochleography in the chinchilla. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 119:767–771

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dallos P, Popper AN, Fay RR (1996) The cochlea. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0757-3

  • Dauman R, Aran JM, Portmann M (1986) Summating potential and water balance in Meniere’s disease. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 95:389–395

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Durrant JD, Wang J, Ding DL, Salvi RJ (1998) Are inner or outer hair cells the source of summating potentials recorded from the round window? J Acoust Soc Am 104:370–377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro JA (2010) Electrocochleography: a review of recording approaches, clinical applications, and new findings in adults and children. J Am Acad Audiol 21:145–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro JA, City K (2000) Clinical electrocochleography: overview of theories, techniques and applications

  • Ferraro JA, Ferguson R (1989) Tympanic ECochG and conventional ABR: a combined approach for the identification of wave I and the I–V interwave interval. Ear Hear 10:161–166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro JA, Arenberg IK, Hassanein RS (1985) Electrocochleography and symptoms of inner ear dysfunction. Arch Otolaryngol 111:71–74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro JA, Thedinger BS, Mediavilla SJ, Blackwell WL (1994) Human summating potential to tone bursts: observations on tympanic membrane versus promontory recordings in the same patients. J Am Acad Audiol 5:24–29

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fraysse BG, Alonso A, House WF (1980) Menière’s disease and endolymphatic hydrops: clinical-histopathological correlations. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 89:2–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Ge X, Shea JJ (2002) Transtympanic electrocochleography: a 10-year experience. Otol Neurotol 23:799–805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson WP, Moffat DA, Ramsden RT (1977) Clinical electrocochleography in the diagnosis and management of Meneère’s disorder. Audiology 16:389–401

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goin DW, Staller SJ, Asher DL, Mischke RE (1982) Summating potential in Meniere’s disease. Laryngoscope 92:1383–1389

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gürkov R, Flatz W, Louza J et al (2011) In vivo visualization of endolyphatic hydrops in patients with Meniere’s disease: correlation with audiovestibular function. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268:1743–1748. doi:10.1007/s00405-011-1573-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horner KC (1993) Functional changes associated with experimentally induced endolymphatic hydrops. Hear Res 68:1–18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horner KC, Cazals Y (1988) Independent fluctuations of the round-window summating potential and compound action potential following the surgical induction of endolymphatic hydrops in the guinea pig. Int J Audiol 27:147–155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hornibrook J, Kalin C, Lin E et al (2012) Transtympanic electrocochleography for the diagnosis of Ménière’s disease. Int J Otolaryngol 2012:852714. doi:10.1155/2012/852714

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hott ME, Graham M, Bonassar LJ, Megerian CA (2003) Correlation between hearing loss and scala media area in guinea pigs with long-standing endolymphatic hydrops. Otol Neurotol 24:64–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iseli C, Gibson W (2010) A comparison of three methods of using transtympanic electrocochleography for the diagnosis of Meniere’s disease: click summating potential measurements, tone burst summating potential amplitude measurements, and biasing of the summating potential using a low frequency tone. Acta Otolaryngol 130:95–101. doi:10.3109/00016480902858899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kumagami H, Nishida H, Baba M (1982) Electrocochleographic study of Ménière’s disease. Arch Otolaryngol 108:284–288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Li G (2005) Testing statistical significance of the area under a receiving operating characteristics curve for repeated measures design with bootstrapping. J Data Sci 3:257–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz-Depiereux B, Guido VE, Johnson KR et al (2004) New intragenic deletions in the Phex gene clarify X-linked hypophosphatemia-related abnormalities in mice. Mamm Genome 15:151–161

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Megerian CA (2005) Diameter of the cochlear nerve in endolymphatic hydrops: implications for the etiology of hearing loss in Ménière’s disease. Laryngoscope 115:1525–1535. doi:10.1097/01.mlg.0000167804.82950.9e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Megerian CA, Semaan MT, Aftab S et al (2008) A mouse model with postnatal endolymphatic hydrops and hearing loss. Hear Res 237:90–105. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2008.01.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Melki SJ, Heddon CM, Frankel JK et al (2010) Pharmacological protection of hearing loss in the mouse model of endolymphatic hydrops. Laryngoscope 120:1637–1645. doi:10.1002/lary.21018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mori N, Asai H, Sakagami M, Matsunaga T (1987) Comparison of summating potential in Menière’s disease between trans- and extratympanic electrocochleography. Audiology 26:348–355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orchik DJ, Shea JJ Jr, Ge X (1993) Transtympanic electrocochleography in Meniere’s disease using clicks and tone-bursts. Am J Otol 14:290–294

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paparella MM (1984) Pathogenesis of Meniere’s disease and Meniere’s syndrome. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 406:10–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyykkö I, Nakashima T, Yoshida T et al (2013) Meniere’s disease: a reappraisal supported by a variable latency of symptoms and the MRI visualisation of endolymphatic hydrops. BMJ Open. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001555

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sass K (1998) Sensitivity and specificity of transtympanic electrocochleography in Meniere’s disease. Acta Otolaryngol 118:150–156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt PH, Eggermont JJ, Odenthal DW (1974) Study of Menière’s disease by electrocochleography. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 316:75–84

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schuknecht HF (1976) Pathophysiology of endolymphatic hydrops. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 212:253–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Semaan MT, Megerian CA (2011) Ménière’s disease: a challenging and relentless disorder. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 44:383–403. doi:10.1016/j.otc.2011.01.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seo Y, Kim J, Choi J, Lee W (2012) Visualization of endolymphatic hydrops and correlation with audio-vestibular functional testing in patients with definite Meniere’s disease. Auris Nasus Larynx

  • Sheykholeslami K, Megerian CA, Zheng QY (2009) Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in normal mice and Phex mice with spontaneous endolymphatic hydrops. Otol Neurotol 30:535–544. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e31819bda13

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Deelen GW, Smoorenburg GF (1986) Electrocochleography for different electrode positions in guinea pig. Acta Otolaryngol 101:207–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Deelen GW, Ruding PR, Veldman JE et al (1987) Electrocochleographic study of experimentally induced endolymphatic hydrops. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 244:167–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida T, Teranishi M, Kato M et al (2013) Endolymphatic hydrops in patients with tinnitus as the major symptom. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. doi:10.1007/s00405-013-2380-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M (2012) Response pattern based on the amplitude of ear canal recorded cochlear microphonic waveforms across acoustic frequencies in normal hearing subjects. Trends Amplif 16:117–126. doi:10.1177/1084713812448547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01DC009246 to Q.Y.Z; R01DC01816 to K.N.A.) and funds from the Maniglia Endowed Chair, University Hospitals Case Medical Center (to K.N.A) and Pogue Endowed Chair (To C.A.M). We thank Heping Yu for her assistance in histological processing and animal breeding.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kumar N Alagramam.

Additional information

S.J.M. and Y.L. are co-first authors.

C.A.M and K.N.A are co-senior authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Melki, S.J., Li, Y., Semaan, M.T. et al. A Mouse Model Validates the Utility of Electrocochleography in Verifying Endolymphatic Hydrops. JARO 15, 413–421 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-014-0445-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-014-0445-0

Keywords

Navigation