Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Consensus Definitions and Interpretation Templates for Fluoroscopic Imaging of Defecatory Pelvic Floor Disorders

Proceedings of the Consensus Meeting of the Pelvic Floor Consortium of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, the Society of Abdominal Radiology, the International Continence Society, the American Urogynecologic Society, the International Urogynecological Association, and the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons

  • CONSENSUS STATEMENT
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 15 June 2021

A Correction to this article was published on 28 January 2021

This article has been updated

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Change history

References

  1. Flusberg M, Kobi M, Bahrami S et al (2019) Multimodality imaging of pelvic floor anatomy. Abdom Radiol (NY). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02235-5(published online ahead of print November 12, 2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bordeianou LG, Carmichael JC, Paquette IM et al (2018) Consensus statement of definitions for anorectal physiology testing and pelvic floor terminology (revised). Dis Colon Rectum 61:421–427

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ridgeway BM, Weinstein MM, Tunitsky-Bitton E (2018) American Urogynecologic Society best-practice statement on evaluation of obstructed defecation. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 24:383–391

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mellgren A, Bremmer S, Johansson C et al (1994) Defecography. Results of investigations in 2,816 patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 37:1133–1141

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Altman D, López A, Kierkegaard J et al (2005) Assessment of posterior vaginal wall prolapse: comparison of physical findings to cystodefecoperitoneography. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16:96–103

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Altman D, Mellgren A, Kierkegaard J, Zetterström J, Falconer C, López A (2004) Diagnosis of cystocele—the correlation between clinical and radiological evaluation. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 15:3–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kashyap AS, Kohli DR, Raizon A, Olden KW (2013) A prospective study evaluating emotional disturbance in subjects undergoing defecating proctography. World J Gastroenterol 19:3990–3995

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Pescatori M, Spyrou M, Pulvirenti DA (2006) A prospective evaluation of occult disorders in obstructed defecation using the ‘iceberg diagram.’ Colorectal Dis 8:785–789

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Palmer SL, Lalwani N, Bahrami S, Scholz F (2019) Dynamic fluoroscopic defecography: updates on rationale, technique, and interpretation from the Society of Abdominal Radiology Pelvic Floor Disease Focus Panel. Abdom Radiol (NY). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02169-y(published online ahead of print August 2, 2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gonçalves AN, Sala MA, Bruno RC et al (2016) Defecography by digital radiography: experience in clinical practice. Radiol Bras 49:376–381

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Jorge JM, Habr-Gama A, Wexner SD (2001) Clinical applications and techniques of cinedefecography. Am J Surg 182:93–101

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stoker J, Halligan S, Bartram CI (2001) Pelvic floor imaging. Radiology 218:621–641

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Goei R, Kemerink G (1990) Radiation dose in defecography. Radiology 176:137–139

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ikenberry S, Lappas JC, Hana MP, Rex DK (1996) Defecography in healthy subjects: comparison of three contrast media. Radiology 201:233–238

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Maglinte DD, Bartram C (2007) Dynamic imaging of posterior compartment pelvic floor dysfunction by evacuation proctography: techniques, indications, results and limitations. Eur J Radiol 61:454–461

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Carrington EV, Scott SM, Bharucha A, International Anorectal Physiology Working Group and the International Working Group for Disorders of Gastrointestinal Motility and Function et al (2018) Expert consensus document: advances in the evaluation of anorectal function. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 15:309–323

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Brennan D, Williams G, Kruskal J (2008) Practical performance of defecography for the evaluation of constipation and incontinence. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 29:420–426

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pilkington SA, Nugent KP, Brenner J et al (2012) Barium proctography vs magnetic resonance proctography for pelvic floor disorders: a comparative study. Colorectal Dis 14:1224–1230

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rex DK, Lappas JC (1992) Combined anorectal manometry and defecography in 50 consecutive adults with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 35:1040–1045

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bielefeldt K, Enck P, Zamboglou N, Moedder U, Erckenbrecht JF (1991) Anorectal manometry and defecography in the diagnosis of fecal incontinence. J Clin Gastroenterol 13:661–665

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kruyt RH, Delemarre JB, Gooszen HG, Hermans J (1992) Defecography and anorectal manometry. Eur J Radiol 15:166–170

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chaudhry Z, Tarnay C (2016) Descending perineum syndrome: a review of the presentation, diagnosis, and management. Int Urogynecol J 27:1149–1156

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Felt-Bersma RJ, Luth WJ, Janssen JJ, Meuwissen SG (1990) Defecography in patients with anorectal disorders. Which findings are clinically relevant? Dis Colon Rectum 33:277–284

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Agachan F, Pfeifer J, Wexner SD (1996) Defecography and proctography. Results of 744 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 39:899–905

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Alves-Ferreira PC, Gurland B, Zutshi M, Hull T (2012) Perineal descent does not imply a more severe clinical disorder. Colorectal Dis 14:1372–1379

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Choi JS, Wexner SD, Nam YS et al (2000) Intraobserver and interobserver measurements of the anorectal angle and perineal descent in defecography. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1121–1126

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Grossi U, Di Tanna GL, Heinrich H, Taylor SA, Knowles CH, Scott SM (2018) Systematic review with meta-analysis: defecography should be a first-line diagnostic modality in patients with refractory constipation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 48:1186–1201

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jorge JM, Ger GC, Gonzalez L, Wexner SD (1994) Patient position during cinedefecography. Influence on perineal descent and other measurements. Dis Colon Rectum 37:927–931

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ambrose S, Keighley MR (1985) Outpatient measurement of perineal descent. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 67:306–308

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Ho YH, Goh HS (1995) The neurophysiological significance of perineal descent. Int J Colorectal Dis 10:107–111

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, Somers S, Stevenson GW (1989) Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut 30:1737–1749

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Parks AG, Porter NH, Hardcastle J (1966) The syndrome of the descending perineum. Proc R Soc Med 59:477–482

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Baek HN, Hwang YH, Jung YH (2010) Clinical significance of perineal descent in pelvic outlet obstruction diagnosed by using defecography. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 26:395–401

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Chang J, Chung SS (2012) An analysis of factors associated with increased perineal descent in women. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 28:195–200

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Lau CW, Heymen S, Alabaz O, Iroatulam AJ, Wexner SD (2000) Prognostic significance of rectocele, intussusception, and abnormal perineal descent in biofeedback treatment for constipated patients with paradoxical puborectalis contraction. Dis Colon Rectum 43:478–482

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tsunoda A, Ohta T, Kiyasu Y, Kusanagi H (2015) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for rectoanal intussusception: postoperative evaluation with proctography. Dis Colon Rectum 58:449–456

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Cundiff GW, Harris RL, Coates K, Low VH, Bump RC, Addison WA (1997) Abdominal sacral colpoperineopexy: a new approach for correction of posterior compartment defects and perineal descent associated with vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177:1345–1353

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bordeianou L, Savitt L, Dursun A (2011) Measurements of pelvic floor dyssynergia: which test result matters? Dis Colon Rectum 54:60–65

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Seong MK, Kim TW (2013) Significance of defecographic parameters in diagnosing pelvic floor dyssynergia. J Korean Surg Soc 84:225–230

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Karasick S, Karasick D, Karasick SR (1993) Functional disorders of the anus and rectum: findings on defecography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 160:777–782

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Maccioni F (2013) Functional disorders of the ano-rectal compartment of the pelvic floor: clinical and diagnostic value of dynamic MRI. Abdom Imaging 38:930–951

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bartram CI, Turnbull GK, Lennard-Jones JE (1988) Evacuation proctography: an investigation of rectal expulsion in 20 subjects without defecatory disturbance. Gastrointest Radiol 13:72–80

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Bordeianou L, Hicks CW, Olariu A et al (2015) Effect of coexisting pelvic floor disorders on fecal incontinence quality of life scores: a prospective, survey-based study. Dis Colon Rectum 58:1091–1097

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Watadani Y, Vogler SA, Warshaw JS et al (2013) Sacrocolpopexy with rectopexy for pelvic floor prolapse improves bowel function and quality of life. Dis Colon Rectum 56:1415–1422

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hainsworth AJ, Solanki D, Hamad A, Morris SJ, Schizas AM, Williams AB (2017) Integrated total pelvic floor ultrasound in pelvic floor defaecatory dysfunction. Colorectal Dis 19:O54–O65

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Carter D, Gabel MB (2012) Rectocele—does the size matter? Int J Colorectal Dis 27:975–980

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Delemarre JB, Kruyt RH, Doornbos J et al (1994) Anterior rectocele: assessment with radiographic defecography, dynamic magnetic resonance imaging, and physical examination. Dis Colon Rectum 37:249–259

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Maglinte DD, Bartram CI, Hale DA et al (2011) Functional imaging of the pelvic floor. Radiology 258:23–39

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Poncelet E, Rock A, Quinton JF et al (2017) Dynamic MR defecography of the posterior compartment: comparison with conventional x-ray defecography. Diagn Interv Imaging 98:327–332

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Liu J, Zhai LD, Li YS, Liu WX, Wang RH (2009) Measuring the space between vagina and rectum as it relates to rectocele. World J Gastroenterol 15:3051–3054

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Colaiacomo MC, Masselli G, Polettini E et al (2009) Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor: a pictorial review. Radiographics 29:e35

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Hicks CW, Weinstein M, Wakamatsu M, Savitt L, Pulliam S, Bordeianou L (2014) In patients with rectoceles and obstructed defecation syndrome, surgery should be the option of last resort. Surgery 155:659–667

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Palit S, Bhan C, Lunniss PJ et al (2014) Evacuation proctography: a reappraisal of normal variability. Colorectal Dis 16:538–546

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. de Vergie LC, Venara A, Duchalais E, Frampas E, Lehur PA (2017) Internal rectal prolapse: definition, assessment and management in 2016. J Visc Surg. 154:21–28

    Google Scholar 

  55. Cavallaro PM, Staller K, Savitt LR et al (2019) The contributions of internal intussusception, irritable bowel syndrome, and pelvic floor dyssynergia to obstructed defecation syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum 62:56–62

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Kim NY, Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Carchman EH, Wald A, Robbins JB (2018) Defecography: an overview of technique, interpretation, and impact on patient care. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 47:553–568

    Google Scholar 

  57. Tsunoda A, Takahashi T, Ohta T, Fujii W, Kiyasu Y, Kusanagi H (2016) Anterior intussusception descent during defecation is correlated with the severity of fecal incontinence in patients with rectoanal intussusception. Tech Coloproctol 20:171–176

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Hawkins AT, Olariu AG, Savitt LR et al (2016) Impact of rising grades of internal rectal intussusception on fecal continence and symptoms of constipation. Dis Colon Rectum 59:54–61

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Wijffels NA, Jones OM, Cunningham C, Bemelman WA, Lindsey I (2013) What are the symptoms of internal rectal prolapse? Colorectal Dis 15:368–373

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Interventional Review Programme (2018) Interventional procedure overview of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for internal prolapse

  61. Morandi C, Martellucci J, Talento P, Carriero A (2010) Role of enterocele in the obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS): a new radiological point of view. Colorectal Dis 12:810–816

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Jorge JM, Yang YK, Wexner SD (1994) Incidence and clinical significance of sigmoidoceles as determined by a new classification system. Dis Colon Rectum 37:1112–1117

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A complete list of the members of the Expert Workgroup on Fluoroscopic Imaging of Pelvic Floor Disorders is provided in Table 1.

Funding

None reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liliana Bordeianou.

Ethics declarations

Financial Disclosures

None reported.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is being published concurrently in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, and Techniques in Coloproctology. The articles are identical except for minor stylistic and spelling differences in keeping with each journal’s style. Citation from any of the 3 journals can be used when citing this article.

Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text, and links to the digital files are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal’s Web site (www.dcrjournal.com).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paquette, I., Rosman, D., Sayed, R.E. et al. Consensus Definitions and Interpretation Templates for Fluoroscopic Imaging of Defecatory Pelvic Floor Disorders. Tech Coloproctol 25, 3–17 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02376-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-020-02376-6

Keywords

Navigation