Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Applicability, safety and efficiency of outpatient treatment in uncomplicated diverticulitis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In most cases of diverticulitis, inflammation is mild, and the only treatment required is a clear liquid diet and antibiotics. Until recently, patients were given this treatment as inpatients with the consequent expenditure of resources. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of an outpatient treatment protocol with oral antibiotics in selected patients with uncomplicated acute diverticulitis in comparison with inpatient intravenous treatment.

Methods

We conducted a prospective non-randomized study between January 2007 and December 2009. We included all patients diagnosed with uncomplicated acute diverticulitis, at the Emergency Department of the University General Hospital of Elche. We compared the efficacy, safety and costs of hospital treatment with intravenous antibiotics and outpatient treatment with oral antibiotics. Seventy-six patients were included in the study. Forty-four of them underwent intravenous treatment with Metronidazole 500 mg/8 h + Ciprofloxacin 400 mg/12 h (hospital treatment group) and 32 took oral antibiotics Metronidazole 500 mg/8 h and Ciprofloxacin 500 mg/12 h (outpatient group).

Results

Outpatient treatment is viable in almost 95 % of those patients suffering from uncomplicated acute diverticulitis. Treatment was effective in resolving inflammation, and there were no complications in the majority of cases (94 %). Only 2 patients (6 %) required admission after outpatient treatment. The results further reflect complications and relapse rates similar to those of patients admitted to hospital and treated with intravenous antibiotics. There are no significant statistical differences (p = 0.86) between inpatients and outpatients. It is possible to save approximately 1,600 € per patient with outpatient treatment (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Outpatient treatment has demonstrated a safety and efficiency similar to inpatient treatment, producing an important reduction in expenses and medical resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sandler RS, Everhart JE, Donowitz M et al (2002) The burden of selected digestive diseases in the United States. Gastroenterology 122:1500–1511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Commane DM, Arasaradnam RP, Mills S, Mathers JC, Bradburn M (2009) Diet, ageing and genetic factors in the pathogenesis of diverticular disease. World J Gastroenterol 15:2479–2488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kohler L, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E (1999) Diagnosis and treatment of diverticular disease: results of a consensus development conference. The scientific committee of the European association for endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 13:430–436

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gordon P (1998) Diverticular disease. In: Nicholls RJ, Dozois RR (eds) Surgery of the colon and rectum. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 691–798

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stollman NH, Raskin JB (1999) Diverticular disease of the colon. J Clin Gastroenterol 29:241–252

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ambrosetti P, Jenny A, Becker C, Terrier T, Morel P (2000) Acute left colonic diverticulitis-compared performance of computed tomography and water-soluble contrast enema: prospective evaluation of 420 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1363–1367

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stollman N, Raskin JB (2004) Diverticular disease of the colon. Lancet 363:631–639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferrer J, Fondevila C, Bombuy E et al (2006) Controlled, open, parallel-group study of the clinical and microbiological efficacy of piperacillin-tazobactam versus metronidazole + gentamicin in urgent colorectal surgery. Cir Esp 79:365–369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lombardo L, Lapertosa G (1991) The Ambulatory treatemnt of colonic diverticulitis. An open clinico-endoscopic-histological study with rifaximin, a nonaminoglycoside enteric antibiotic. Recenti Prog Med 82:300–304

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mizuki A, Nagata H, Tatemichi M, Kaneda S, Tsukada N, Ishii H (2005) The outpatient management of patients with acute mild.to-moderate colonic diverticulitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 21:889–897

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Alonso S, Pera M, Parés D et al (2010) Outpatient treatemnt of patients with uncomplicated acute diverticulitis. Colorectal Dis 12:278–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ridgway P, Latif A, Shabbir J et al (2009) Randomised controlled trial of oral versus intravenous therapy for clinically diagnosed acute uncomplicated diverticulitis. Colorectal Dis 11:941–946

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim HU, Kim YH, Choe WH et al (2003) Clinical characteristics of colonic diverticulitis in Koreans. Korean J Gastroenterol 42:363–368

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Doringer E (1992) Computerized tomography of colonic diverticulitis. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging 33:421–435

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kang JY, Hoare J, Tinto A et al (2003) Diverticular disease of the colon on the rise: a study of hospital admissions in England between 1989/1990 and 1999/2000. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 17:1189–1195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Moya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moya, P., Arroyo, A., Pérez-Legaz, J. et al. Applicability, safety and efficiency of outpatient treatment in uncomplicated diverticulitis. Tech Coloproctol 16, 301–307 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-012-0847-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-012-0847-0

Keywords

Navigation