Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer: matched comparison in elderly and younger patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Several studies have addressed the issue of the feasibility of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients, usually by choosing an arbitrary cut-off age limit, and retrospectively evaluating patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of age on the outcome of laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer in a single department, by comparing younger and older patients, matched by ASA score and type of operation.

Methods

The perioperative outcome of patients ≥75 years old who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer between June 2005 and January 2009 were compared with findings in younger patients, matched by ASA score and type of operation.

Results

The study included 100 patients, fifty <75 years old (Group A) and fifty ≥75 (Group B) years old. There were 18 right hemicolectomies, 16 left hemicolectomies, 4 anterior resections, 9 low anterior resections, 2 Miles’ operations and 1 segmental resection in each group. We observed a significantly higher overall morbidity rate among elderly patients than among younger patients (24 vs. 8%).

Conclusions

Short-term results after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer in patients ≥75 years old reveal that they have higher postoperative risk compared to their younger counterparts, even when matched by ASA score and type of operation. It suggests that although advanced age, per se, is not a contraindication, it is a risk for patients who undergo laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer. This surgery in elderly patients should be performed by experienced surgeons in specialized centers to keep postoperative risk to a minimum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lacy AM, Garcìa-Valdecasas LC, Delgado S et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomized trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Milsom JW, Bohm B, Hammerhofer KA, Fazio V, Steiger E, Elson P (1998) A prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 187:146–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kwok SP, Lau WY, Carey PD, Kelly SB, Leung KL, Li AK (1996) Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted large bowel excision for cancer. Ann Surg 223:170–176

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wexner SD, Cohen SM, Johansen OB, Nogueras JJ, Jagelman DG (1993) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery. A prospective assessment and current perspective. Br J Surg 80:1602–1605

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Seshadri PA, Mamazza J, Schlachta CM, Cadeddu MO, Poulin EC (2001) Laparoscopic colorectal resection in octogenarians. Surg Endosc 15:802–805

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stocchi L, Nelson H, Young-Fadok TM, Larson DR, Ilstrup DM (2000) Safety and advantages of laparoscopic vs. open colectomy in the elderly: matched-control study. Dis Colon Rectum 43:326–332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Delgado S, Lacy AM, Garcìa-Valdecasas JC et al (2000) Could age be an indication for laparoscopic colectomy in colorectal cancer? Surg Endosc 14:22–26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vignali A, Di Palo S, Tamburini A, Radaelli G, Orsenigo E, Staudacher C (2005) Laparoscopic vs. open colectomies in octogenarians: a case-matched control study. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2070–2075

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. De Santis L, Frigo F (2005) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the elderly. Acta Biomed 76:S24–S26

    Google Scholar 

  10. Scheidbach H, Schneider C, Hugel O, Yildrim C, Lippert H, Kockerling F (2005) Laparoscopic surgery in the old patient: do indications and outcome differ? Langenbecks Arch Surg 390:328–332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yamamoto S, Watanabe M, Hasegawa H, Baba H, Kitajima M (2003) Short-term surgical outcome of laparoscopic colonic surgery in octogenarians: a matched case-control study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 13:95–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sklow B, Read T, Birnbaum E, Fry R, Fleshman J (2003) Age and type of procedure influence the choice of patients for laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 17:923–929

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheung HY, Chung CC, Fung JT, Wong JC, Yau KK, Li MK (2007) Laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer in octogenarians: results in a decade. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1905–1910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Colorectal Cancer Collaborative Group (2000) Surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a systematic review. Lancet 356:968–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hoekstra HJ (2001) Cancer surgery in the elderly. Eur J Cancer 37:S235–S244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nascimbeni R, Di Fabio F, Di Betta E, Salerni B (2009) The changing impact of age on colorectal cancer surgery: a trend analysis. Colorectal Dis 11:13–18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schwandner O, Schiedeck TH, Bruch HP (1999) Advanced age: indication or contraindication for laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Dis Colon Rectum 42:356–362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis 40:373–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Crea N, Di Fabio F, Pata G, Nascimbeni R (2009) APACHE II, POSSUM, and ASA scores in the risk of perioperative complications in patients with colorectal disease. Ann Ital Chir 80:177–181

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Fiscon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fiscon, V., Portale, G., Frigo, F. et al. Laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer: matched comparison in elderly and younger patients. Tech Coloproctol 14, 323–327 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-010-0635-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-010-0635-7

Keywords

Navigation