Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tandem high-dose chemotherapy with topotecan–thiotepa–carboplatin and melphalan–etoposide–carboplatin regimens for pediatric high-risk brain tumors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

High-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous stem-cell transplantation (auto-SCT) are used to improve the survival of children with high-risk brain tumors who have a poor outcome with the standard treatment. This study aims to evaluate the outcome of HDC/auto-SCT with topotecan–thiotepa–carboplatin and melphalan–etoposide–carboplatin (TTC/MEC) regimens in pediatric brain tumors.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 33 children (median age 6 years) who underwent HDC/auto-SCT (18 tandem and 15 single) with uniform conditioning regimens.

Results

Eleven patients aged < 3 years at diagnosis were eligible for HDC/auto-SCT to avoid or defer radiotherapy. In addition, nine patients with high-risk medulloblastoma (presence of metastasis and/or postoperative residual tumor ≥ 1.5 cm2), eight with other high-risk brain tumor (six CNS primitive neuroectodermal tumor, one CNS atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor, and one pineoblastoma), and five with relapsed brain tumors were enrolled. There were three toxic deaths, and two of which were due to pulmonary complications. The main reason for not performing tandem auto-SCT was due to toxicities and patient refusal. The event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of all patients were 59.4% and 80.0% at a median follow-up with 49.1 months from the first HDC/auto-SCT, respectively. The EFS/OS rates of patients aged < 3 years at diagnosis, high-risk medulloblastoma, other high-risk brain tumor, and relapsed tumors were 50.0/81.8%, 87.5/85.7%, 66.7/88.9%, and 20.0/60.0%, respectively.

Conclusions

Although tandem HDC/auto-SCT with TTC/MEC regimens showed promising survival rates, treatment modifications are warranted to reduce toxicities. The survival rates with relapsed brain tumors were unsatisfactory despite HDC/auto-SCT, and further study is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ACTH:

Adrenocorticotropic hormone

ANC:

Absolute neutrophil count

ARDS:

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

ATRT:

Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor

Auto-SCT:

Autologous stem-cell transplantation

CE:

Cyclophosphamide-melphalan

CPC:

Chroid plexus carcinoma

CNS:

Central nervous system

CR:

Complete response

CSRT:

Craniospinal radiotherapy

CTE:

Carboplatin–thiotepa–etoposide

EFS:

Event-free survival

GHD:

Growth hormone deficiency

HDC:

High-dose chemotherapy

MBL:

medulloblastoma

MEC:

Melphalan–etoposide–carboplatin

OS:

Overall survival

PBL:

Pineoblastoma

PBSCM:

Peripheral blood stem-cell mobilization

PNET:

Primitive neuroectodermal tumor

PR:

Partial response

SNHL:

Sensorineural-hearing loss

TRM:

Treatment-related mortality

TTC:

Topotecan–thiotepa–carboplatin

References

  1. Mulhern RK, Merchant TE, Gajjar A et al (2004) Late neurocognitive sequelae in survivors of brain tumours in childhood. Lancet Oncol 5:399–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dhall G, Grodman H, Ji L et al (2008) Outcome of children less than three years old at diagnosis with non-metastatic medulloblastoma treated with chemotherapy on the "Head Start" I and II protocols. Pediatr Blood Cancer 50:1169–1175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Friedrich C, von Bueren AO, von Hoff K et al (2013) Treatment of young children with CNS-primitive neuroectodermal tumors/pineoblastomas in the prospective multicenter trial HIT 2000 using different chemotherapy regimens and radiotherapy. Neuro Oncol 15:224–234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fangusaro J, Finlay J, Sposto R et al (2008) Intensive chemotherapy followed by consolidative myeloablative chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic cell rescue (AuHCR) in young children with newly diagnosed supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumors (sPNETs): report of the Head Start I and II experience. Pediatr Blood Cancer 50:312–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sabel M, Fleischhack G, Tippelt S et al (2016) Relapse patterns and outcome after relapse in standard risk medulloblastoma: a report from the HIT-SIOP-PNET4 study. J Neurooncol 129(3):515–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bode U, Zimmermann M, Moser O et al (2014) Treatment of recurrent primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNET) in children and adolescents with high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and stem cell support: results of the HITREZ 97 multicentre trial. J Neurooncol 120:635–642

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Raghuram CP, Moreno L, Zacharoulis S (2012) Is there a role for high dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem cell rescue in patients with relapsed supratentorial PNET? J Neurooncol 106:441–447

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Butturini AM, Jacob M, Aguajo J et al (2009) High-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell rescue in children with recurrent medulloblastoma and supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumors: the impact of prior radiotherapy on outcome. Cancer 115:2956–2963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Park JE, Kang J, Yoo KH et al (2010) Efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with relapsed medulloblastoma: a report on the Korean Society for Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (KSPNO)-S-053 study. J Korean Med Sci 25:1160–1166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zaky W, Dhall G, Khatua S et al (2015) Choroid plexus carcinoma in children: the Head Start experience. Pediatr Blood Cancer 62:784–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zaky W, Dhall G, Ji L et al (2014) Intensive induction chemotherapy followed by myeloablative chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell rescue for young children newly-diagnosed with central nervous system atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors: the Head Start III experience. Pediatr Blood Cancer 61:95–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dunkel IJ, Gardner SL, Garvin JH Jr et al (2010) High-dose carboplatin, thiotepa, and etoposide with autologous stem cell rescue for patients with previously irradiated recurrent medulloblastoma. Neuro Oncol 12:297–303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosenfeld A, Kletzel M, Duerst R et al (2010) A phase II prospective study of sequential myeloablative chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem cell rescue for the treatment of selected high risk and recurrent central nervous system tumors. J Neurooncol 97:247–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kushner BH, Cheung NK, Kramer K et al (2001) Topotecan combined with myeloablative doses of thiotepa and carboplatin for neuroblastoma, brain tumors, and other poor-risk solid tumors in children and young adults. Bone Marrow Transpl 28:551–556

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gilheeney SW, Khakoo Y, Souweidane M et al (2010) Thiotepa/topotecan/carboplatin with autologous stem cell rescue in recurrent/refractory/poor prognosis pediatric malignancies of the central nervous system. Pediatr Blood Cancer 54:591–595

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dupuis-Girod S, Hartmann O, Benhamou E et al (1996) Will high dose chemotherapy followed by autologous bone marrow transplantation supplant cranio-spinal irradiation in young children treated for medulloblastoma? J Neurooncol 27:87–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shih CS, Hale GA, Gronewold L et al (2008) High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue for children with recurrent malignant brain tumors. Cancer 112:1345–1353

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD et al (2007) The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol 114:97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G et al (2016) The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 131:803–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA et al (2010) Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol 28:1963–1972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Scrucca L, Santucci A, Aversa F (2007) Competing risk analysis using R: an easy guide for clinicians. Bone Marrow Transpl 40:381–387

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Panoskaltsis-Mortari A, Griese M, Madtes DK et al (2011) An official American Thoracic Society research statement: noninfectious lung injury after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: idiopathic pneumonia syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 183:1262–1279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Choi YH, Jeong HJ, An HY et al (2017) Early predictors of mortality in children with pulmonary complications after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Pediatr Transpl 21:13062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sung KW, Lim do H, Son MH et al (2013) Reduced-dose craniospinal radiotherapy followed by tandem high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with high-risk medulloblastoma. Neuro Oncol 15:352–359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sung KW, Lim DH, Yi ES et al (2016) Tandem high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation for atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor. Cancer Res Treat 48(4):1408–1419

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bouffet E, Doz F, Demaille MC et al (1998) Improving survival in recurrent medulloblastoma: earlier detection, better treatment or still an impasse? Br J Cancer 77:1321–1326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Grewal S, Merchant T, Reymond R et al (2010) Auditory late effects of childhood cancer therapy: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Pediatrics 125:e938–e950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Desai AV, Heneghan MB, Li Y et al (2016) Toxicities of busulfan/melphalan versus carboplatin/etoposide/melphalan for high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue for high-risk neuroblastoma. Bone Marrow Transpl 51(9):1204–1210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bergthold G, El Kababri M, Varlet P et al (2014) High-dose busulfan-thiotepa with autologous stem cell transplantation followed by posterior fossa irradiation in young children with classical or incompletely resected medulloblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 61:907–912

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Afessa B, Abdulai RM, Kremers WK et al (2012) Risk factors and outcome of pulmonary complications after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Chest 141:442–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yadav H, Nolan ME, Bohman JK et al (2016) Epidemiology of acute respiratory distress syndrome following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Crit Care Med 44:1082–1090

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gassas A, Craig-Barnes H, Dell SD et al (2013) Severe lung injury and lung biopsy in children post-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: the differences between allogeneic and autologous transplantation. Pediatr Transpl 17:278–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bilgrami SF, Metersky ML, McNally D et al (2001) Idiopathic pneumonia syndrome following myeloablative chemotherapy and autologous transplantation. Ann Pharmacother 35:196–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lee JW, Kang HJ, Park JD et al (2009) Early pulmonary complications after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in pediatric patients: association with cytomegalovirus infection. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 31:545–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Clement SC, Meeteren AY, Kremer LC et al (2014) High prevalence of early hypothalamic-pituitary damage in childhood brain tumor survivors: need for standardized follow-up programs. Pediatr Blood Cancer 61:2285–2289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shalitin S, Gal M, Goshen Y et al (2011) Endocrine outcome in long-term survivors of childhood brain tumors. Horm Res Paediatr 76:113–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Chemaitilly W, Cohen LE (2017) DIAGNOSIS OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: Endocrine late-effects of childhood cancer and its treatments. Eur J Endocrinol 176:R183–R203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Seoul National University Research Grant in 2016 (800-20160150) and by the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (2016M3A9D3026905).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyoung Jin Kang.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, J.Y., Kang, H.J., Hong, K.T. et al. Tandem high-dose chemotherapy with topotecan–thiotepa–carboplatin and melphalan–etoposide–carboplatin regimens for pediatric high-risk brain tumors. Int J Clin Oncol 24, 1515–1525 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-019-01517-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-019-01517-8

Keywords

Navigation