Abstract
Background
There is controversy regarding strategies for treating very elderly patients with gastric carcinoma. We aimed to assess survival after surgery in very elderly patients according to their clinical characteristics.
Methods
Gastric cancer patients aged ≥85 years were retrospectively reviewed. There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics between 58 patients with curative resection (OP group) and 32 patients with best supportive care alone (BSC group) in cancer stage IA–IIIC and with a performance status of 0–3.
Results
Overall survival (OS) was significantly better in the OP group than in the BSC group in females [hazard ratio (HR) 0.27, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.12–0.57, P < 0.001] but not in males (HR 0.71, 95 % CI 0.35–1.49, P = 0.35). OS was significantly better in the OP group in patients aged 85–89 years (HR 0.44, 95 % CI 0.25–0.78, P = 0.006) but not in patients aged ≥90 years (HR 0.47, 95 % CI 0.12–1.66, P = 0.24). OS was significantly better in the OP group in patients with stage IB–IIIC cancer (HR 0.29, 95 % CI 0.14–0.58, P < 0.001) but not in patients with stage IA cancer (HR 0.52, 95 % CI 0.21–1.27, P = 0.15).
Conclusions
Females, patients aged 85–89 years, and patients with stage IB–IIIC cancer had significantly better OS with surgery than without. For males, patients aged ≥90 years, or stage IA patients, the decision to perform surgery should be carefully made, and BSC might be an optimal strategy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2012) Abridged Life Tables for Japan 2010. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/database/db-hw/lifetb10/1.html Accessed June 2012
Endo S, Yoshikawa Y, Hatanaka N et al (2011) Treatment for gastric carcinoma in the oldest old patients. Gastric Cancer 14:139–143
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2011) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer 14:101–112
Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (2009) TNM classification of malignant tumors, 7th edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, p 73–77
Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M (1991) POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg 78:355–360
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2011) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer 14:113–123
Pinkhasov RM, Shteynshlyuger A, Hakimian P et al (2010) Are men shortchanged on health? Perspective on life expectancy, morbidity, and mortality in men and women in the United States. Int J Clin Pract 64:465–474
Massarweh NN, Legner VJ, Symons RG et al (2009) Impact of advancing age on abdominal surgical outcomes. Arch Surg 144:1108–1114
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the health information managers who investigated the outcomes of the patients—Ms. Chiga Iitani from the Higashiosaka City General Hospital and Ms. Fumiko Matsufuru from the National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center/Chugoku Cancer Center.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. This study is not supported by any funding, equipment, and drugs.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Endo, S., Dousei, T., Yoshikawa, Y. et al. Prognosis of gastric carcinoma patients aged 85 years or older who underwent surgery or who received best supportive care only. Int J Clin Oncol 18, 1014–1019 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-012-0482-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-012-0482-9