Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outcomes of planned delivery delay in pregnant patients with invasive gynecologic cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Pregnancy with invasive gynecologic cancer is a rare condition. It is still unclear whether we can choose planned delay in treatment until maturation of the fetus as a treatment modality for this condition. If there are no adverse effects from the cancer and there is improvement of neonatal outcomes, this treatment modality might be an option for patients with this condition.

Methods

Eight pregnant patients were diagnosed as having invasive gynecologic cancer between January 1998 and December 2007. Five of them, (four with invasive uterine cervical cancer and one with ovarian cancer) chose planned delay in treatment. The pregnancy courses and prognoses of these patients were studied.

Results

The period of planned delay in treatment varied from 2 weeks to 19 weeks. The period was shorter for patients who had complications. The pain caused by the cancer was the main obstacle to this treatment modality in two patients (one with advanced ovarian cancer and one with uterine cervical cancer). No apparent tumor growth, elevation of tumor markers, or complications induced by the cancer itself were detected in the remaining three patients. Only the patient with advanced ovarian cancer died of the primary disease after the delivery. Fetal outcome was uniformly good for the delayed-treatment group. All the babies are growing well, and no fetal deaths or neonatal deaths occurred.

Conclusion

Planned delay in treatment to allow for fetal maturity is acceptable in pregnant patients with certain types of invasive gynecologic cancers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pavlidis NA (2002) Coexistence of pregnancy and malignancy. Oncologist 7:279–287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Germann N, Haie-Meder C, Morice P, et al. (2005) Management and clinical outcomes of pregnant patients with invasive cervical cancer. Ann Oncol 16:397–402

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sorosky JI, Squatrito R, Ndubisi BU, et al. (1995) Stage I squamous cell cervical carcinoma in pregnancy: planned delay in therapy awaiting fetal maturity. Gynecol Oncol 59:207–210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Takushi M, Moromizato H, Sakumoto K, et al. (2002) Management of invasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix associated with pregnancy: outcome of intentional delay in treatment. Gynecol Oncol 87:185–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ishioka S, Hayashi T, Endo T, et al. (2007) Advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma during pregnancy. Int J Clin Oncol 12: 375–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bray F, Carstensen B, Møller H, et al. (2005) Incidence trends of adenocarcinoma of the cervix in 13 European countries. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14:2191–2199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eifel PJ, Burke TW, Morris M, et al. (1995) Adenocarcinoma as an independent risk factor for disease recurrence in patients with stage IB cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 59:38–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Degefu S, O’Quinn AG, Lacey CG et al. (1986) Verrucous carcinoma of the cervix: a report of two cases and literature review. Gynecol Oncol 25:37–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zanotti KS, Belinson JL, Kennedy AW (2000). Treatment of gynecologic cancers in pregnancy. Semin Oncol 27:686–698

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rakic S, Nikolic B, Dragojevic-ikic S (2005) Ovarian neoplasms and pregnancy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 15:1120–1123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Beeley L (1988) Adverse effects of drugs in the first trimester of pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 13:177–195

    Google Scholar 

  12. Malfetano JH, Goldkrand JW (1990) Cis-platinum combination chemotherapy during pregnancy for advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 75:545–547

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Picone O, Lhomme C, Tournaire M, et al. (2004) Preservation of pregnancy in a patient with a stage IIIB ovarian epithelial carcinoma diagnosed at 22 weeks of gestation and treated with initial chemotherapy: case report and literature review. Gynecol Oncol 94:600–604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Karam A, Feldman N, Holschneider CH (2007) Neoadjuvant cisplatin and radical cesarean hysterectomy for cervical cancer in pregnancy. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 4:375–380

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Serenius F, Ewald U, Farooqi A, et al. (2004) Short-term outcome after active perinatal management at 23–25 weeks of gestation. A study from two Swedish tertiary care centres. Part 1: maternal and obstetric factors. Acta Paediatr 93:945–953

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ikenoue T (1986) The maternal, fetal and neonatal clinical characteristics in cases delivered between 24 and 32 weeks’ gestation Nippon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi 38:1198–1208

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shin-ichi Ishioka.

About this article

Cite this article

Ishioka, Si., Ezaka, Y., Endo, T. et al. Outcomes of planned delivery delay in pregnant patients with invasive gynecologic cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 14, 321–325 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-008-0861-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-008-0861-4

Key words

Navigation