Skip to main content
Log in

Detection and evaluation of intracranial aneurysms with 16-row multislice CT angiography: comparison with conventional angiography

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of our study was to compare multidetector row computed tomography (CT) angiography (MDCTA) with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the detection and characterization of intracranial aneurysms. Between September 2005 and May 2007, 55 consecutive patients with suspected intracranial aneurysms underwent conventional DSA and MDCTA. Thirty-two women and 23 men were enrolled in the study. The mean patient age was 54 (range = 26–79 years). All MDCTA and DSA images were independently evaluated on a workstation by two radiologists, who had 8 and 6 years of experience in CT vascular imaging and angiography. Using DSA as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of CT angiography was calculated for each reader with 95% confidence intervals. The sensitivity was also calculated for aneurysms smaller than 3 mm with 95% confidence intervals. The agreement between the readers for detecting aneurysms was calculated using kappa statistics. A kappa statistic greater than 0.75 was considered an excellent agreement beyond chance, a kappa statistic of 0.4–0.75, fair to good agreement, and a kappa statistic less than 0.4, poor agreement. At DSA, 64 aneurysms were present in 50 patients involved in the study; seven patients had two aneurysms each, and four patients had three aneurysms each. In five patients, no aneurysm was detected by using MDCTA and DSA, and evaluations were considered as true negative by MDCTA. These five patients also had negative findings at repeat DSA. For readers 1 and 2, the sensitivity of MDCT in detecting aneursyms were 96.9% (95% CI = 89.3–99.1%; 62 of 64) and 98.4 % (95% CI = 91.7–99.7%; 63 of 64), respectively. The spescificity was100% (95% CI = 99.7–100%; 1,256 of 1,256) for both readers. The kappa value indicating interobserver agreement was in the category of excellent (kappa = 0.99 (95% CI = 0.97–1). Regarding the aneurysms smaller than 3 mm, for readers 1 and 2, the sensitivities were 84.6% (95% CI = 57.8–95.7%; 11 of 13) and 92.3% (95% CI = 66.7–98.6; 12 of 13), respectively. MDCTA is accurate in the detection and characterization of intracranial aneurysms and can be used as a reliable alternative imaging technique to DSA. A strategy of using CT angiography as the primary method, with DSA reserved for any cases of uncertainty, appears safe and reliable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Linn FH, Rinkel GJ, Algra A, van Gijn J (1996) Incidence of subarachnoid hemorrhage: role of region, year, and rate of computed tomography: a meta-analysis. Stroke 27:625–629

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. King JT Jr (1997) Epidemiology of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 7:659–668

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cloft HJ, Joseph GJ, Dion JE (1999) Risk of cerebral angiography in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, cerebral aneurysm, and arteriovenous malformation: a meta-analysis. Stroke 30:317–320

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaufmann TJ, Huston J 3rd, Mandrekar JN, Schleck CD, Thielen KR, Kallmes DF (2007) Complications of diagnostic cerebral angiography: evaluation of 19,826 consecutive patients. Radiology 243(3):812–819

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Willinsky RA, Taylor SM, TerBrugge K, Farb RI, Tomlinson G, Montanera W (2003) Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 227(2):522–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chappell ET, Moure FC, Good MC (2003) Comparison of computed tomographic angiography with digital subtraction angiography in the diagnosis of cerebral aneurysms: a meta-analysis. Neurosurgery 52(3):624–631 (discussion 630–631)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wintermark M, Uske A, Chalaron M, Regli L, Maeder P, Meuli R, Schnyder P, Binaghi S (2003) Multislice computerized tomography angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: a comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. J Neurosurg 98(4):828–836

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jayaraman MV, Mayo-Smith WW, Tung GA, Haas RA, Rogg JM, Mehta NR, Doberstein CE (2004) Detection of intracranial aneurysms: multi-detector row CT angiography compared with DSA. Radiology 230(2):510–518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hochmuth A, Spetzger U, Schumacher M (2002) Comparison of 2D and 3D digital subtraction angiography in evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. Am J Neuroradiol 23:1545–1552

    Google Scholar 

  10. Van Rooij WJ, Sprengers ME, de Gast AN, Peluso JP, Sluzewski M (2008) 3D rotational angiography: the new gold standard in the detection of additional intracranial aneurysms. Am J Neuroradiol (in press)

  11. Villablanca JP, Jahan R, Hooshi P, Lim S, Duckwiler G, Patel A, Sayre J, Martin N, Frazee J, Bentson J, Viñuela F (2002) Detection and characterization of very small cerebral aneurysms by using 2D and 3D helical CT angiography. Am J Neuroradiol 23:1187–1198

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yoon DY, Lim KJ, Choi CS, Cho BM, Oh SM, Chang SK (2007) Detection and characterization of intracranial aneurysms with 16-channel multidetector row CT angiography: a prospective comparison of volume-rendered images and digital subtraction angiography. Am J Neuroradiol 28(1):60–67

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tipper G, U-King-Im JM, Price SJ et al (2005) Detection and evaluation of intracranial aneurysms with 16-row multislice CT angiography. Clin Radiol 60:565–572

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. El Khaldi M, Pernter P, Ferro F, Alfieri A, Decaminada N, Naibo L, Bonatti G (2007) Detection of cerebral aneurysms in nontraumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage: role of multislice CT angiography in 130 consecutive patients. Radiol Med (Torino) 112(1):123–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Agid R, Lee SK, Willinsky RA, Farb RI, Terbrugge KG (2006) Acute subarachnoid hemorrhage: using 64-slice multidetector CT angiography to “triage” patients’ treatment. Neuroradiology 48(11):787–794

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lubicz B, Levivier M, François O, Thoma P, Sadeghi N, Collignon L, Balériaux D (2007) Sixty-four-row multisection CT angiography for detection and evaluation of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: interobserver and intertechnique reproducibility. Am J Neuroradiol 28(10):1949–1955

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Venema HW, Hulsmans FJ, den Heeten GJ (2001) CT angiography of the circle of Willis and intracranial internal carotid arteries: maximum intensity projection with matched mask bone elimination-feasibility study. Radiology 218:893–898

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Romijn M, van Andel HA, van Walderveen MA et al (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of CT angiography with matched mask bone elimination for detection of intracranial aneurysms: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and 3D rotational angiography. Am J Neuroradiol 29:134–139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ender Uysal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uysal, E., Oztora, F., Ozel, A. et al. Detection and evaluation of intracranial aneurysms with 16-row multislice CT angiography: comparison with conventional angiography. Emerg Radiol 15, 311–316 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-008-0727-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-008-0727-0

Keywords

Navigation