Abstract
The production of energy crops in Germany is a growing agronomic sector and is expected to occupy a substantial share of farmland in the near future. At the same time, there are concerns that energy crops might cause increased nitrogen pollution of soil water, surface water and groundwater. Therefore, the Federal State of Saxony, Germany, funded a study on potential effects of an intensified cultivation of energy crops. In frame of this study, we used the Web GIS-based model STOFFBILANZ to simulate N leaching from the rooting zone and N loads of surface water for a reference scenario and an energy crop scenario. For the reference scenario, we used data representing the crop cultivation for the year 2005 at municipality level. We found that the total loads for N leaching from the rooting zone of cropland are highest for the loess region (8,067 t year−1), followed by mountainous region (6,797 t year−1) and lowland (5,443 t year−1). However, highest N fluxes in the leachate from rooting zones have been simulated for lowland (40.6 kg ha−1 year−1) and mountainous region (37.1 kg ha−1 year−1), while nitrate concentrations of leachate were highest for the lowland (101.8 mg l−1). In terms of diffuse N input into surface water, the mountainous region is the most important source area (total N load 6,380 t year−1, flux 34.6 kg ha−1 year−1). Retention by in-stream processes accounts for 15 % (3,784 t year−1) of the total N load leaving the study area (25,136 t year−1). In the 2020 energy crop scenario, shares of rape and silage maize (id., ensiled corn) were limited for each municipality to a maximum of 25 and 33 %, respectively. The conversion of grasslands to crop farming was not allowed. Under these conditions, we found slight to substantial reductions of nitrogen loads for leachate from the rooting zone and for surface waters. The simulated reduction depends strongly on local conditions. Only small reductions (ca. 4–8 %) were found for the lowlands and mountainous regions of Saxony, while reductions for the loess region were substantial (ca. 22 %). A major outcome of our study is that the cultivation of energy crops might reduce N loss if certain preconditions are assumed, for example, without conversion of grasslands to crop farming. However, effects might vary widely depending on local conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander RB, Böhlke JK, Boyer EW, David MB, Harvey JW, Mulholland PJ, Seitzinger SP, Tobias CR, Tonitto C, Wollheim WM (2009) Dynamic modeling of nitrogen losses in river networks unravels the coupled effects of hydrological and biogeochemical processes. Biogeochemistry 93:91–116
Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah S, Williams JR (1998) Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment, part I: model development. JAWRA 34:73–89
Behrendt H, Kornmilch M, Opitz D, Schmoll O, Scholz G, Uebe R (2002) Estimation of the nutrient inputs into river systems- experiences from German rivers. Reg Environ Change 3:107–117
Berkhoff K (2008) Spatially explicit groundwater vulnerability assessment to support the implementation of the water framework directive—a practical approach with stakeholders. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 12:111–122
Berndes G (2002) Bioenergy and water—the implications of large-scale bioenergy production for water use and supply. Global Environ Change 12:253–271
Börjesson P (1999) Environmental effects of energy crop cultivation in Sweden. Biomass Bioenergy 16:137–154
Brisson N, Mary B, Ripoche D, Jeuffroy MH, Ruget F, Gate P, Devienne F, Antonioletti R, Durr C, Nicoullaud B, Beaudoin N, Recous S, Tayot X, Plenet D, Richard G, Cellier P, Machet JM, Meynard JM, Delécolle R (1998) STICS: a generic crop simulation model with water and nitrogen balance. Application to wheat and maize. I. Theory and parameterization. Agronomie 22(1):69–92
Brisson N, Launay M, Mary B, Beaudoin N (2009) Conceptual basis, formalisations and parameterization of the stics crop model. Editions Quae, Paris
de Klein JJM (2008) From ditch to delta: nutrient retention in running waters. PhD-thesis Wageningen University, Wageningen
Donner SD, Kucharik CJ, Oppenheimer M (2004) The influence of climate on in-stream removal of nitrogen. Geophys Res Lett 31:L20509
EEA (2007) Estimating the environmentally compatible bioenergy potential from agriculture. EEA Technical report 12/2007, European Environmental Agency, Copenhagen
EFMA (2006) Forecast of food, farming and fertiliser use in the European Union 2006–2016. European fertiliser manufacturers association, Brussels
Eiswerth ME, van Kooten GC (2010) Balancing bio-energy cropping benefits and water quality impacts: a dynamic optimilization approach. Can J Agric Econ 58:463–480
Erisman JW, Domburg P, de Haan BJ, de Vries W, Kros J, Velthof G, Sanders K (2005) The dutch nitrogen cascade in the European perspective. ECN Biomass, Coal Environ Res, ECN-C—05-007. http://www.ecn.nl/publications/PdfFetch.aspx?nr=ECN-C-05-007. Accessed 14 March 2011
European Parliament (2000) Establishing a framework for Community action in the foeld of water policy. Directive 2000/60/EC, Council of the European Parliament, Brussels
Finck M (2010) Modellierung des N-Austrags unter Berücksichtigung regionaler N-Umsetzungsprozesse, Hohenheimer Bodenkundliche Hefte, Heft 96, 231 S, Diss., Uni Hohenheim
Franko U, Oelschlägel B, Schenk S (1995) Simulation of temperature-, water- and nitrogen dynamics using the model CANDY. Ecol Model 81:213–222
Franko U, Kuka K, Romanenko I, Romanenkov V (2007) Validation of the CANDY model with Russian long-term experiments. Reg Environ Change 7(2):79–91
Galloway JN, Aber JD, Erisman JW, Seitzinger SP, Howarth RW, Cowling EB, Cosby J (2003) The nitrogen cascade. Bioscience 53(4):341–356
Galloway JN, Townsend AR, Erisman JW, Bekunda M, Cai Z, Freney JR, Martinelli LA, Seitzinger SP, Sutton M (2008) Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: recent trends, questions, and potential solutions. Science 320:889–892
Gauger T, Haenel HD, Rösemann C, Dämmgen U, Bleeker A, Erisman JW, Vermeulen AT (2008) National implementation of the UNECE convention on long-range transboundary air pollution (effects), part 1: deposition loads, final report, FKZ 204 63 252, UBA, Dessau
Gebel M, Halbfass S, Bürger S, Friese H, Naumann S (2010a) Modelling of nitrogen turnover and leaching in Saxony. Adv Geosci 27:139–144
Gebel M, Halbfaß S, Bürger S, Uhlig M, Grunewald K, Kaiser M (2010b) STOFFBILANZ—Manual. http://www.stoffbilanz.de. Accessed 14 March 2011
Giles J (2005) Nitrogen study fertilizes fears of pollution. Nature 433:791
Grimm-Strele J, Casper M, van Dijk P, Finck M, Gudera T, Korte S (2008) Der Modellverbund MoNit zur Simulation der Grundwasserbelastung durch Nitrat im Oberrheingraben. Wasserwirtschaft 1–2:55–89
Gruber N, Galloway JN (2008) An Earth-system perspective of the global nitrogen cycle. Nature 451:293–296
Halbfass S (2005) Entwicklung eines GIS-gestützten Modells zur Quantifizierung diffuser Phosphoreinträge in Oberflächengewässer im mittleren Massstab unter Berücksichtigung geoökologisch wirksamer Raumstrukturen. Diss., Rhombos-Verlag, Bd. 1, Berlin (in German)
Halbfass S, Gebel M, Friese H, Grunewald K, Mannsfeld K (2009) Atlas der Nährstoffeinträge in sächsische Gewässer. https://publikationen.sachsen.de/bdb/download.do;jsessionid=25291D6B2BB376FE6022FC6292017180.bdb_lb?id=2296290. Accessed 14 March 2011 (in German)
Halbfass S, Gebel M, Bürger S (2010) Modelling of long term nitrogen retention in surface waters. Adv Geosci 27:145–148
Hannappel S, Reinhardt S, Kuhn K, Lankau R (2007) Konzeptionelle Grundlagen und Aufbau der überblicksweisen Überwachung der Grundwasserkörper in Sachsen gemäß den Anforderungen der WRRL.- In: Grundwasser Altlasten Aktuell, Materialien zur Altlastenbehandlung, Hrsg.: Landesamt für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft und Geologie. http://www.umwelt.sachsen.de/de/wu/umwelt/lfug/lfug-internet/documents/32_Altlasten_GW_Aktuell2007.pdf. Accessed 5 March 2012 (in German)
Hill J, Nelson E, Tilman D, Polasky S, Tiffany D (2006) Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(30):11206–11210
Kersebaum KC, Matzdorf B, Kiesel J, Piorr A, Steidl J (2006) Model-based evaluation of agri-environmental measures in the Federal State of Brandenburg (Germany) concerning N pollution of groundwater and surface water. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 169:352–359
Kronvang B, Andersen HE, Borgensen C, Dalgaard T, Larsen SE, Bogestrand J, Blicher-Mathiasen G (2008) Effects of policy measures implemented in Denmark on nitrogen pollution of the aquatic environment. Environ Sci Policy 11:144–152
Krysanova V, Becker A (1999) Integrated modelling of hydrological processes and nutrient dynamics at the river basin scale. Hydrobiologia 410:131–138
Kunkel R, Wendland F (1997) WEKU, A GIS-supported stochastic model of groundwater residence times in upper aquifers for the supraregional groundwater management. Environ Geol 30:1–9
Lam QD, Schmalz B, Fohrer N (2009) Ecohydrological modelling of water discharge and nitrate loads in a mesoscale lowland catchment. Ger Adv Geosci 21:49–55
Ledoux E, Gomez E, Monget J-M, Viavattene C, Viennot P, Benoit M, Mignolet C, Schott C, Mary B (2007) Agriculture and groundwater nitrate contamination in the seine basin. The STICS-MODCOU modelling chain. Sci Total Environ 375(1–3):33–47
Mary B, Guérif J (1994) Intérêts et limites des modèles de prévision de l’ évolution des matières organiques et de l’azote dans le sol. Cahiers Agric 3:247–257
Mary B, Recous S, Darwis D, Robin D (1996) Interactions between decomposition of plant residues and nitrogen cycling in soil. Plant Soil 181:71–82
Meijerink G, Langeveld H, Hellegers P (2007) Biofuels and water: an exploration. http://www.boci.wur.nl/NR/rdonlyres/98CCE2E3-0FA2-4274-BCA0-20713CA1E125/62620/Fullreport1_Water_Meijerink_Hellegers_Langeveld.pdf. Accessed 14 March 2011
Meynard JM, Justes E, Machet JM, Recous S (1996) Fertilisation azotée des cultures annuelles de plein champ. In: Lemaire G, Nicolardot B (eds) Maitrise de l’azote dans les agro-systèmes. Les colloques de l’INRA, Reims, pp 183–199
Post J, Krysanova V, Suckow F, Mirschel W, Rogasik J, Merbach I (2007) Integrated eco-hydrological modelling of soil organic matter dynamics for the assessment of environmental change impacts in meso- to macro-scale river basins. Ecol Model 206:93–109
Reiche EW (1994) Modelling water and nitrogen dynamics on catchment scale. Ecol Model 75(76):371–384
Sächsisches Staatsministerium für Umwelt und Landwirtschaft (2011) Stickstoff-Bilanz. http://www.umwelt.sachsen.de/umwelt/4686.asp?id=4822&headline=Land-%20und%20Forstwirtschaft. Accessed 25 Feb 2012 (in German)
Schoumans OF, Silgram M, Groenendijk P, Bouraoui F, Andersen HE, Kronvang B, Behrendt H, Arheimer B, Johnsson H, Panagopoulos Y, Mimikou M, Lo Porto A, Reisser H, Le Gall G, Barr A, Anthony SG (2009) Description of nine nutrient loss models: capabilities and suitability based on their characteristics. J Environ Monit 11:506–514
Seitzinger SP, Styles R, Boyer EW, Alexander RB, Billen G, Howarth RW, Mayer B, Van Breemen N (2002) Nitrogen retention in rivers: model development and application to watersheds in the northeastern USA. Biogeochemístry 57/58:199–237
Stream Solute Workshop (1990) Concepts and methods for assessing solute dynamics in stream ecosystems. J North Am Benthologic Soc 9(2):95–119
UBA (2008) Hintergrundpapier zu einer multimedialen Stickstoff-Emissionsminderungsstrategie. http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/luft/downloads/emissionen/hg-stickstoffemissionsminderungsstrategie.pdf. Accessed 14 March 2011 (in German)
Uhlig M, Gebel M, Halbfass S, Liedl R (2010) Mesoscale modeling of nitrate pollution of rivers by groundwater. Grundwasser 15:163–176 (in German)
US Congress (1993) Potential environmental impacts of bioenergy crop production. http://www.fas.org/ota/reports/9337.pdf. Accessed 14 March 2011
US Soil Conservation Service (1972) National engineering handbook (Chap 4: Hydrology, 2nd reprint), US Department of Agriculture, Washington
Vassiljev A, Stålnacke P (2003) Statistical modelling of riverine nutrient sources and retention in the lake Peipsi drainage basin. Diffuse pollution conference Dublin 2003, 10C GIS, 10/41–10/46
Venohr M, Donohue I, Fogelberg S, Arheimer B, Irvine K, Behrendt H (2003) Nitrogen retention in a river system under consideration of the river morphology and occurence of lakes. Diffuse pollution conference Dublin 2003, 1C Water Resources Management, 1/61–1/67
Venterink HO, Wiegman F, Van der Lee GEM, Vermaat JE (2003) Role of active floodplains for nutrient retention in the River Rhine. J Environ Qual 32:1430–1435
Wendland F, Kunkel R, Grimvall A, Kronvang B, Müller-Wohlfeil D (2001) Model system for the management of nitrogen leaching at the scale of river basins and regions. Water Sci Technol 43(7):215–222
Wessolek G, Duijnisveld WHM, Trinks S (2008) Hydro-pedotransfer functions (HPTFs) for predicting annual percolation rate on a regional scale. J Hydrol 356:17–27
Wollheim WM, Vörösmarty CJ, Peterson BJ, Seitzinger SP, Hopkinson CS (2006) Relationship between river size and nutrient removal. Geophysic Res Lett 33:L06410. doi:10.1029/2006GL025845
Wollheim WM, Peterson BJ, Hopkinson CS, Thomas SM, Vörösmarty CJ (2008) Dynamics of N removal over annual time periods in a suburban river network. J Geophys Res 113:1–17
Young R, Onstad CA, Bosch DD, Anderson WP (1987) AGNPS: Agricultural non-point source pollution model: a watershed analysis tool. USDA-Agricultural Research Service. Conservation Research Report 35, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC
Acknowledgments
The study was funded by the Saxonian Agency for Environment, Agriculture and Geology. We would like to thank all colleagues of the agency for their cooperation, support and for providing data on agriculture, hydrology, soil and climate.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gebel, M., Halbfass, S., Bürger, S. et al. Long-term simulation of effects of energy crop cultivation on nitrogen leaching and surface water quality in Saxony/Germany. Reg Environ Change 13, 249–261 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-012-0330-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-012-0330-5