Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Dangerous levels of climate change for agricultural production in China

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Regional Environmental Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are increasing attempts to define the measures of ‘dangerous anthropogenic inference with the climate system’ in context of Article 2 of the Framework Convention on Climate Change, due to its linkage to goals for stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations. The criteria for identifying dangerous anthropogenic interference may be characterized in terms of the consequences of climate change. In this study, we use the water stress index (WSI) and agricultural net primary production (NPP) as indictors to assess where and when there might be dangerous effects arising from the projected climate changes for Chinese agricultural production. The results showed that based on HadCM3-based climate change scenarios, the region between the North China Plain and Northeast China Plain (34.25–47.75°N, 110.25–126.25°E) would be vulnerable to the projected climate change. The analyses on inter-annual variability showed that the agricultural water resources conditions would fluctuate through the period of 2001–2080 in the region under IPCC SRES A2 scenario, with the period of 2021–2040 as critical drought period. Agricultural NPP is projected to have a general increasing trend through the period of 2001–2080; however, it could decrease during the period of 2005–2035 in the region under the IPCC SRES A2 scenario, and during the period of 2025–2035 under IPCC SRES B2 scenario. Generally, while projected climate change could bring some potentially improved conditions for Chinese agriculture, it could also bring some critical adverse changes in water resources, which would affect the overall outcome. At this stage, while we have identified certain risks and established the general shape of the damage curve expressed as a function of global mean temperature increase, more works are needed to identify specific changes which could be dangerous for food security in China. Therefore, there is a need for the development of more integrated assessment models, which include social-economic, agricultural production and food trade modules, to help identify thresholds for impacts in further studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alocilja EC, Ritchie RT (1988) Rice simulation and its use in multicriteria optimization. IBSNAT Research Report Series 01 IBSNAT Project, Hawaii

  • Cai XM (2005) Risk in irrigation water supply and the effects on food production. J AmWater Resour Assoc 41(3):679–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO/IIASA (2000) Global agro-ecological zones (global-AEZ) -CD-Rom. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, http://www.fao.org/ag/AGL/agll/gaez/index.htm

  • IPCC (2001a) Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA

  • IPCC (2001b) Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA

  • IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Working Group II Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA

  • Levy PE, Cannell MGR, Friend AD (2004) Modelling the impact of future changes in climate, CO2 concentration and land use on natural ecosystems and the terrestrial carbon sink. Glob Environ Change 14(1):21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieth H (1975) Modeling the primary productivity of the world. In: Lieth H, Whittaker RH (eds) Primary productivity of the biosphere. Springer, Berlin, Germany, pp 237–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin E (2004) Investigating the impacts of climate change on Chinese agriculture. China-UK collaboration project. Agrometeorology Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Beijing, China

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu H, Li XB, Fischer G, Sun LX (2004) Study on the impacts of climate change on China’s agriculture. Clim Change 65(1–2):125–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakicenovic N, Swart R (eds) (2000) Emissions scenarios. 2000 Special report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig C, Strzepek KM, Major DC, Iglesias A, Yates DN, McCluskey A, Hillel D (2004) Water resources for agriculture in a changing climate: international case studies. Glob Environ Change 14(4):345–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Tao F, Zhang Z (2010) Impacts of climate change as a function of global mean temperature: maize productivity and water use in China. Clim Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9883-9

  • Tao F, Yokozawa M, Hayashi Y, Lin E (2003) Future climate change, the agricultural water cycle, and agricultural production in China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 95(1):203–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao FL, Yokozawa M, Zhang Z, Hayashi Y, Grassl H, Fu CB (2004) Variability in climatology and agricultural production in China in association with the East Asian summer monsoon and El Niño Southern Oscillation. Clim Res 28(1):23–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao FL, Yokozawa M, Hayashi Y, Lin ED (2005) A perspective on water resources in China: interactions between climate change and soil degradation. Clim Change 68(1–2):169–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tao F, Yokozawa M, Xu Y, Hayashi Y, Zhang Z (2006) Climate changes and trends in phenology and yields of field crops in China, 1981–2000. Agric For Meteorol 138(1–4):82–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao F, Hayashi Y, Zhang Z, Sakamoto T, Yokozawa M (2008a) Global warming, rice production, and water use in China: developing a probabilistic assessment. Agric For Meteorol 148(1):94–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao F, Yokozawa M, Liu J, Zhang Z (2008b) Climate-crop yield relationships at provincial scales in China and the impacts of recent climate trends. Clim Res 38(1):83–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao FL, Yokozawa M, Liu J, Zhang Z (2009) Climate change, land use change, and China’s food security in the twenty-first century: an integrated perspective. Clim Change 93(3–4):433–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uchijima Z, Seino H (1985) Agroclimatic evaluation of net primary productivity of natural vegetations (1) Chikugo model for evaluating net primary productivity. J Agric Meteorol 40:343–352

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was study was supported by National Science Foundation of China (Project Number 41071030), National Key Programme for Developing Basic Science (Project Number 2009CB421105). F. Tao also acknowledges the support of the “Hundred Talents” Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. We would like to thank European Climate Forum (ECF) for the symposium: Key vulnerable regions and climate change: Identifying thresholds for impacts and adaptation in relation to Article 2 of the UNFCCC, ECF Symposium, Beijing, 27–30 October 2004. We also thank Bill Hare at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research for comments and suggestions on early draft of the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fulu Tao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tao, F., Zhang, Z. & Yokozawa, M. Dangerous levels of climate change for agricultural production in China. Reg Environ Change 11 (Suppl 1), 41–48 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-010-0159-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-010-0159-8

Keywords

Navigation