Abstract
Despite the extensive work on human–computer interaction regarding methods of involving users and designing for high degrees of usability, there is surprisingly little published on how procurer organizations understand, reason about, and require usability. This study focuses on how one taxi company dealt with usability requirements when procuring a new dispatch system. We have conducted ten interviews with various stakeholders in the company and analyzed related documentation in order to discover the process. The case shows how the concept of usability matured during over time. The taxi company dealt with requirement elicitation by developing prototypes in small reference groups. They did no formal analysis of the operators’ cooperation with each other at the operator central, but they did include experienced users, which created implicit scenarios. The supplier company did not focus on the efficiency of the operators or, for that matter, the cooperative demands of the operator central in their original design, which became evident when the procurer organization requested a redesign that emphasized user tasks. This indicates, on one hand, the extent to which procurers must understand usability and cooperation to procure good systems design and, on the other hand, the extent to which designers must understand business and activity processes in order to design good systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Artman H (2002) Procurer usability requirements: negotiations in contract development. In: Proceedings of NORDICHI 02, pp 61–70
Artman H, Markensten E (2004) Comparative analysis of usability design in E-Service procurement international conference on E-Commerce, Lisbon, Portugal, pp 345–350
Artman H, Waern Y (1999) Distributed cognition in an emergency co-ordination center. Cognit Technol Work 1:237–246
Buie E (1994) HCI challenges in government contracting. In: Proceedings of the ACM CHI ’94 Conference on human factors in computing systems, 2, p 337
Carlshamre P (2001) A usability perspective on requirement engineering. Doctorate Thesis no: 726. Institute of Technology. Linköping University, Sweden
Carlshamre P, Rantzer M (2000) Dissemination of usability: failure of a success story. Interactions 8(1):31–41
Constantine LL, Lockwood LAD (1999) Software for use. Addison-Wesley, New York
Cooper A (1999) The inmates are running the asylum. SAMS, New York
Dix A, Finlay J, Abowd G, Beale R (1997) Human computer interaction. Prentice Hall, Harlow
Earl MJ (1993) Experiences in strategic information systems planning. MIS Q 17(1):1–24
Følstad A, Jørgensen H, Kogstie J (2004) User involvement in e-Government development projects. In: Proceedings of NordiCHI’04, Tampere, Finland, pp 217–224
Forsgren P (1996) Management of industrial IT procurement. Doctoral Thesis, Industrial Control Systems, Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden
Greenbaum J, Kyng M (eds) (1991) Design at work: cooperative design of computer systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale
Grudin J (1991) The development of interactive systems: bridging the gaps between developers and users. IEEE Comput 24(4):59–69
Gulliksen J, Göransson B (2002) Användarcentrerad Systemdesign [User centered systems design]. Studentlitteratur, Lund
Gulliksen J, Göransson B, Boivie I, Blomkvist S, Persson J, Cajander Å (2003) Key principles for user-centered systems design. Behav Inf Technol 22(6):397–409
Hayes N (1997) Theory-led thematic analysis. In: Hayes N (ed) Doing qualitative analysis in psychology. Biddles Ltd., Kings Lynn, pp 93–114
Helander M, Landauer T, Prabhu P (1997) Handbook of human computer interaction. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Holmlid S (2004) Issues for cooperative design: a procurement perspective. In: Proceedings of participatory design’04, V2, pp 139–142
Holmlid S, Artman H (2003) A tentative model for procuring usable systems. In: Jacko J, Stephanidis C (eds) Proceedings of human–computer interaction international. Lawrence Erlbaum Associated, London, pp 346–350
Keil M, Carmel E (1995) Customer developer links in software development. Commun ACM 38(5):33–44
Markensten E (2003) Procuring usable systems—an analysis of a commercial procurement project. In: Jacko J, Stephanidis C (eds) Proceedings of human–computer interaction international. Lawrence Erlbaum Associated, London, pp 544–548
Markensten E (2005) Mind the gap: a procurement approach to integrating user-centred design in contract development. Licentiate Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm. TRITA-NA-0447
Markensten E, Artman H (2004) Procuring usable systems using unemployed personas. In: Proceedings of NordiCHI’04, Tampere, Finland, pp 13–23
Näslund T (1997) Computer in context—but in which context? In: Kyng M, Mathiassen L (eds) Computers and design in context. MIT Press, Cambridge
Newman W, Lamming M (1995) Interactive systems design. Addison-Wesley, Harlow
Preece J, Rogers Y, Sharp H, Benyon D (1995) Human computer interaction. Addison-Wesley, Harlow
Scown P (1998) Improving the procurement process: humanizing accountants with a human factors education. In: Proceedings of the international conference on information systems
Shneiderman B (1998) Designing the user interface. Addison-Wesley, New York
Standish Group (1995) CHAOS-report. http://www.standishgroup.com/. Visited 2005-01-20
Svensson J (2002) Regera eller reagera, vem styr systemutvecklingen? [Who’s in charge of the development project?]. TRITA-NA-E02105. NADA, Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden
Ward J, Peppard J (2003) Strategic planning for information systems. Wiley, New York
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the taxi company. We also wish to thank Ann Lantz, Anna Swartling, Erik Markensten, and Stefan Holmlid for their comments on an earlier draft. This study was sponsored by the Swedish Agency for Innovation Systems.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Artman, H., Zällh, S. Finding a way to usability: procurement of a taxi dispatch system. Cogn Tech Work 7, 141–155 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-005-0182-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-005-0182-6