Abstract
Exploring the duality between a return to dollar definition of profit and the generalized distance function we establish the relationship between the Laspeyres, Paasche and Fisher productivity indexes and their alternative Malmquist indexes counterparts. By proceeding this way, we propose a consistent decomposition of these productivity indexes into two mutually exclusive components. A technical component represented by the Malmquist index and an economical component which can be identified with the contribution that allocative criteria make to productivity change. With regard to the Fisher index, we indicate how researchers can further decompose the Malmquist technical component rendering explicit the sources of productivity change. We also show how the proposed model can be implemented by means of Data Envelopment Analysis techniques, and illustrate the empirical process with an example data set.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abramovitz M (1956) Resource and output trends in the United States Since 1870. National Bureau of Economic Research Occasional Paper, 52
Althin R, Färe R, Grosskopf S (1996) Profitability and productivity change: an application to Swedish pharmacies. Ann Oper Res 66:219–233
Balk B (1998) Industrial price, quantity and productivity indexes: the microeconomic theory and an application. Kluwer, Boston
Balk B (2001) Scale efficiency and productivity change. J Product Anal 15:153–183
Chambers R, Chung Y, Färe R (1998) Profit, directional distance functions and Nerlovian Efficiency. J Optim Theory Appl 95(2):351–364
Chavas J-P, Cox TM (1999) A generalized distance function and the analysis of production efficiency. Southern Econ J 66(2):295–318
Cooper W, Seiford L, Tone K (2000) Data envelopment analysis. a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-Software. Kluwer, Boston
Diewert EW (1992) The measurement of productivity. Bull Econ Res 44(3):163–198
Diewert EW, Lawrence D (1999) Measuring New Zealand’s productivity, Treasury Working Paper 99/5, http://www.treasury.govt.nz/workingpapers/99-5.htm
Färe R, Grosskopf S (2000) Notes on some inequalities in economics. Econ Theory 15(1):227–233
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lindgren B, Roos P (1994). Productivity developments in Swedish hospitals: a Malmquist output approach. In: Charnes A, Cooper W, Lewin A, Seiford L (eds). Data envelopment analysis: theory, methodology and applications. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK (1985) The measurement of efficiency of production. Kluwer, Boston
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Zaim T (2002) Hyperbolic efficiency and return to dollar. Eur J Oper Res 136:671–679
Färe R, Primont D (1995) Multi-output production and duality: theory and applications. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Farrell M (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc. A 120(3):253–281
Fisher I (1921) The best form of index number. J Am Stat Assoc 17:533–537
Georgescu-Roegen N (1951). The aggregate linear production function and its application to von Newman’s economic model. In: Koopmans T (eds). Activity analysis of production and allocation. Wiley, New York
Grifell-Tatjé E, Lovell CAK (1999) A generalized Malmquist productivity index. Trab Invest Oper Top 7(1):81–101
Griliches Z (1987). Productivity: measurement problems. In: Eatwell J, Milgate M, Newman P (eds). The new Palgrave: a dictionary of economics. Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Harberger AC (1998) A vision of the growth process. Am Econ Rev 88(1):1–32
Laspeyres E (1871) Die Berechnung einer mittlerer Waarenpreissteigerung. Järbucher für Nationalokönomie und Statistik 16:296–314
Lovell CAK (2003) The decomposition of Malmquist productivity indexes. J Prod Anal 20:437–438
Malmquist S (1953) Index numbers and indifference curves. Trabajos de Estadística 4(1):209–242
McFadden D (1978) Cost, revenue, and profit functions. In: Fuss M, McFadden D (eds) Production economics: a dual approach to theory and applications. North-Holland, Amsterdam
OECD (2001) Measuring productivity. Measurement of aggregate and industry level productivity growth. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris
Orea L (2002) Parametric decomposition of a generalized Malmquist productivity index. J Prod Anal 18:5–22
Paasche H (1874) Uber die Preisentwicklung der Letzen Jahre Nach den Hamburger Börsennotinrungen. Järbucher für Nationalokönomie und Stististik 23:168–178
Ray S, Desli E (1997) Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries: comment. Am Econ Rev 87(5): 1.033–1.039
Shephard R (1970) Theory of cost and production functions. Princeton University Press, New Jersey
Törnqvist L (1936) The bank of finland’s consumer price index. Bank Finl Mon Bull 19:1–8
Zofío JL, Lovell CAK (2001) Graph efficiency and productivity measures: an application to U.S. Agriculture. Appl Econ 33:1433–1442
Zofio JL (2001) Malmquist productivity index decompositions: a unifying framework. Departamento de Análisis Económico, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (forthcoming in Appl Econ)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zofío, J.L., Prieto, A.M. Return to Dollar, Generalized Distance Function and the Fisher Productivity Index. Spanish Economic Review 8, 113–138 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10108-006-9004-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10108-006-9004-0