Skip to main content
Log in

Augmented non-quadratic penalty algorithms

  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Auslender, Cominetti and Haddou have studied, in the convex case, a new family of penalty/barrier functions. In this paper, we analyze the asymptotic behavior of augmented penalty algorithms using those penalty functions under the usual second order sufficient optimality conditions, and present order of convergence results (superlinear convergence with order of convergence 4/3). Those results are related to the analysis of ‘‘pure’’ penalty algorithms, as well as ‘‘augmented’’ penalty using a quadratic penalty function. Limited numerical examples are presented to appreciate the practical impact of this local asymptotic analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Auslender, A., Cominetti, R., Haddou, M.: Asymptotic analysis of penalty and barrier methods in convex and linear programming. Math. Oper. Res. 22(1), Feb. 1997

  2. Ben-Tal, A., Zibulevsky, M.: Penalty/barrier multiplier methods for convex programming problems. SIAM J. Optim. 7(2) 347–366, May 1997

    Google Scholar 

  3. Breitfeld, M., Shanno, D.: Preliminary computational experience with modified log-barrier functions for large-scale nonlinear programming. Rutcor Research Report RRR 08-93, Rutgers University, New Jersey, 1993

  4. Broyden, C., Attia, N.: A smooth sequential penalty function method for solving nonlinear programming problems. In: P. Thoft-Christenses, (ed.), System Modelling and Optimization, Springler-Verlag, Berlin, 1983, pp. 237–245

  5. Broyden, C., Attia., N.: Penalty functions, newton’s method, and quadratic programming. J. Optim. Theor. Appl. 58, (1988)

  6. Cominetti, R., Dussault, J.-P.: A stable exponential-penalty algorithm with super-linear convergence. J. Optim. Theor. Appl. 83(2), November 1994

  7. Cominetti, R., Martin., J.S.: Asymptotic behavior of the exponential penalty trajectory in linear programming. Math. Program. 67, 169–187 (1994)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Dussault., J.-P.: Numerical stability and efficiency of penalty algorithms. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 32(1), 296–317, February 1995

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dussault., J.-P.: Augmented penalty algorithms. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 18, 355–372 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dussault, J.-P.: Improved convergence order for augmented penalty algorithms. Submitted, 2003

  11. Gould., N.I.M.: On the convergence of a sequential penalty function method for constrained minimization. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 26, 107–108 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hock, W., Schittkowski, K.: Test examples for nonlinear programming codes. Number 187 in Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1981

  13. Kort, B.W., Bertsekas, D.P.: A new penalty function method for constrained minimization. In: Proceedings of the 1972 I.E.E.E. conference on decision and control, New Orleans, LA, December 1972, pp. 162–166

  14. Nash, S., Polyak, R., Sofer, A.: A numerical comparison of barrier and modified barrier methods for large-scale constrained optimization. Technical Report 93-02, Department of Operations Research, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia 22030, 1993

  15. Nguyen, V.H., Strodiot, J.-J.: Convergence rate results for a penalty function method. In: Optimization techniques, proceedings of the 8th IFIP conference on optimization techniques, Würzburg, 1977, pp. 101–106

  16. Nguyen, V.H., Strodiot, J.-J.: On the convergence rate for a penalty function method of exponential type. J. Optim. Theor. Appl. 27 495–508, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  17. Polyak., R.: Modified barrier functions: theory and methods. Math. Progam. 54, 177–222 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Scilab group. Πlab. Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et Automatique – Domaine de Voluceau – Rocquencourt – B.P. 105 – 78153 – LE CHESNAY Cedex – FRANCE, email : Scilab@inria.fr, 1996

  19. Wächter, A., Biegler, L.T.: Failure of global convergence for a class of interior point methods for nonlinear programming. CAPD Technical Report B99-07, Department of Chemical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburg, PA 15213, May 2000

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Pierre Dussault.

Additional information

This research was partially supported by NSERC grant OGP0005491

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dussault, JP. Augmented non-quadratic penalty algorithms. Math. Program., Ser. A 99, 467–486 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-003-0459-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-003-0459-6

Key words.

Navigation