Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of the effects of Er,Cr:YSGG laser and different cavity disinfection agents on microleakage of current adhesives

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Lasers in Medical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser and different cavity disinfection agents on microleakage of an etch-and-rinse and a self-etch adhesive. Class V preparations were completed on the buccal and lingual surfaces of 30 extracted noncarious human molars. The occlusal margin was placed on enamel and the gingival margin on dentin. Preparations were randomly divided into five experimental groups (n = 12); (1) 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX), (2) propolis, (3) ozone, (4) Er,Cr:YSGG laser, and (5) control (no treatment). Each group was divided into two subgroups according to the adhesive system: etch-and-rinse (Adper Single Bond 2), and a self-etch adhesive (All-Bond SE). The preparations were bulk-filled with a resin composite (Arabesk). After storage in distilled water for 24 h the restored teeth were subjected to thermocycling (1,000 cycles; 5–55°C). All specimens were immersed in 0.5% basic fuchsin solution for 24 h and sectioned longitudinally through the centre of the restorations and examined under a stereomicroscope at ×25 magnification. The data were analysed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests. No difference was observed between the groups either on enamel or dentin when the etch-and-rinse adhesive was used (p > 0.05). In the self-etch adhesive groups, a significant difference was found only between the laser group and the CHX group on enamel and between the propolis group and the control group on dentin (p < 0.05). Comparing the etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives within each group, no differences were found on dentin (p > 0.05). On enamel, a statistically significant difference was found only in the CHX group (p < 0.05). There were no differences in microleakage with the laser and the different cavity disinfectant applications when used with etch-and-rinse adhesive. In the self-etch group there were differences in microleakage depending on the disinfection agent used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gürgan S, Bolay Ş, Kiremitçi A (1999) Effect of disinfectant application methods on the bond strength of composite to dentin. J Oral Rehabil 26(10):836–840

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Meiers JC, Kresin JC (1996) Cavity disinfectants and dentin bonding. Oper Dent 21(4):153–159

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Carrilho MR, Carvalho RM, de Goes MF, di Hipólito V, Geraldeli S, Tay FR, Pashley DH, Tjäderhane L (2007) Chlorhexidine preserves dentin bond in vitro. J Dent Res 86(1):90–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ercan E, Erdemir A, Zorba YO, Eldeniz AU, Dalli M, İnce B, Kalaycioğlu B (2009) Effect of different cavity disinfectants on shear bond strength of composite resin to dentin. J Adhes Dent 11(5):343–346

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou J, Tan J, Yang X, Xu X, Li D, Chen L (2010) Effect of chlorhexidine application in a self-etching adhesive on the immediate resin-dentin bond strength. J Adhes Dent 12(1):27–31

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pilo R, Cardash HS, Oz-Ari B, Ben-Amar A (2001) Effect of preliminary treatment of the dentin surface on the shear bond strength of resin composite to dentin. Oper Dent 26(6):569–575

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tulunoğlu O, Ayhan H, Olmez A, Bodur H (1998) The effect of cavity disinfectants on microleakage in dentin bonding systems. J Clin Pediatr Dent 22(4):299–305

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Soares CJ, Pereira CA, Pereira JC, Santana FR, do Prado CJ (2008) Effect of chlorhexidine application on microtensile bond strength to dentin. Oper Dent 33(2):183–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Siso HS, Kustarci A, Göktolga EG (2009) Microleakage in resin composite restorations after antimicrobial pre-treatments: effect of KTP laser, chlorhexidine gluconate and Clearfil Protect Bond. Oper Dent 34(3):321–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Geraldo-Martins VR, Robles FR, Matos AB (2007) Chlorhexidine’s effect on sealing ability of composite restorations following Er:YAG laser cavity preparation. J Contemp Dent Prac 8(5):26–33

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sharma V, Nainan MT, Shivanna V (2009) The effect of cavity disinfectants on the sealing ability of dentin bonding system: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 12(3):109–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mobarak EH, El-Korashy DI, Pashley DH (2010) Effect of chlorhexidine concentrations on micro-shear bond strength of self-etch adhesive to normal and caries-affected dentin. Am J Dent 23(4):217–222

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ricci HA, Sanabe ME, Costa CA, Hebling J (2010) Effect of chlorhexidine on bond strength of two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive systems to dentin of primary and permanent teeth. Am J Dent 23(3):128–132

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Burdock GA (1998) Review of the biological properties and toxicity of bee propolis. Food Chem Toxicol 36(4):347–363

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mori GG, Nures DC, Castilho LR, Moares IG, Poi WR (2010) Propolis as storage media for avulsed teeth: microscopic and morphometric analysis in rats. Dent Traumatol 26(1):80–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Baysan A, Whiley RA, Lynch EE (2000) Antimicrobial effect of a novel ozone-generating device on microorganisms associated with primary root carious lesions in vitro. Caries Res 34(6):489–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Baysan A, Lynch E (2004) Effect of ozone on the oral microbiota and clinical severity of primary root caries. Am J Dent 17:56–60

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Celiberti P, Pazera P, Lussi A (2006) The impact of ozone treatment on enamel physical properties. Am J Dent 19(1):67–72

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Onisor I, Bouillaguet S, Krejci I (2007) Influence of different surface treatments on marginal adaptation in enamel and dentin. J Adhes Dent 9(3):297–303

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dukic W, Dukic OL, Milardovic S (2009) The influence of Healozone on microleakage and fissure penetration of different sealing materials. Coll Antropol 33(1):157–162

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cadenaro M, Delise C, Antoniollo F, Navarra OC, Di Lenarda R, Breschi L (2009) Enamel and dentin bond strength following gaseous ozone application. J Adhes Dent 11(4):287–292

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gürgan S, Firat E, Baysan A, Gutknecht N, Imazato S (2010) Effect of ozone and ND:YAG laser pretreatment on bond strength of self-etch adhesives to coronal and root dentin. Photomed Laser Surg 28(Suppl 2):S3–S9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fried D, Ashouri N, Breunig T, Shori R (2002) Mechanism of water augmentation during IR laser ablation of dental enamel. Laser Surg Med 31(3):186–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Arnabat J, Escribano C, Fenosa A, Vinuesa T, Gay-Escoda C, Berini L, Viñas M (2010) Bactericidal activity of erbium, chromium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser in root canals. Lasers Med Sci 25(6):805–810

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ferrari M, Goracci G, Garcia-Godoy F (1997) Bonding mechanism of three “one-bottle” systems to conditioned and unconditioned enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 10(5):224–230

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Giachetti L, Russo DS, Bambi C, Nieri M, Bertini L (2008) Influence of operator skill on microleakage of total-etch and self-etch bonding systems. J Dent 36(19):49–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Türkün M, Türkün Ş, Kalender A (2004) Effect of cavity disinfectants on the sealing ability of nonrinsing dentin-bonding resins. Quintessence Int 35(6):469–476

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. de Castro FL, de Andrade MF, Duarte Júnior SL, Vaz LG, Ahid FJ (2003) Effect of 2% chlorhexidine on microtensile bond strength of composite to dentin. J Adhes Dent 5(2):129–138

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Santos JN, Carrilho MR, De Goes MF, Goes MF, Zaia AA, Gomes BP, Souza-Filho FJ, Ferraz CC (2006) Effect of chemical irrigants on the bond strength of a self-etching adhesive to pulp chamber dentin. J Endod 32(11):1088–1090

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Campos EA, Correr GM, Leonardi DP, Pizzatto E, Morais EC (2009) Influence of chlorhexidine concentration on microtensile bond strength of contemporary adhesive systems. Braz Oral Res 23(3):340–345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gendron R, Grenier D, Sorsa T, Mayrand D (1999) Inhibition of the activities of matrix metalloproteinases 2, 8, and 9 by chlorhexidine. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 6(3):437–439

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ferreira FB, Torres SA, Rosa OP, Ferreira CM, Garcia RB, Marcucci MC, Gomes BP (2007) Antimicrobial effect of propolis and other substances against selected endodontic pathogens. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 104(5):709–716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kandaswamy D, Venkateshbabu N, Gogulnath D, Kindo AJ (2010) Dentinal tubule disinfection with 2% chlorhexidine gel, propolis, morinda citrifolia juice, 2% povidone iodine, and calcium hydroxide. Int Endod J 43(5):419–423

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Awawdeh L, Al-Beitawi M, Hammad M (2009) Effectiveness of propolis and calcium hydroxide as a short-term intracanal medicament against Enterococcus faecalis: a laboratory study. Aust Endod J 35(2):52–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Duailibe SA, Gonçalves AG, Ahid FJ (2007) Effect of a propolis extract on Streptococcus mutans counts in vivo. J Appl Oral Sci 15(5):420–423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kartal M, Yıldız S, Kaya S, Kurucu S, Topçu G (2003) Antimicrobial activity of propolis from two different regions of Anatolia. J Ethno Pharmacol 86(1):69–73

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Eldeniz AU, Ozer F, Hadimli HH, Erganis O (2007) Bactericidal efficacy of Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation against Enterococcus faecalis compared with NaOCl irrigation: an ex vivo pilot study. Int Endod J 40(2):112–119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Türkün M, Türkün SL, Çelik EU, Ateş M (2006) Bactericidal effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser on Streptococcus mutans. Dent Mater 25(1):81–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Moldes VL, Capp CL, Navarro RS, Matos AB, Youssef MN, Cassoni A (2009) In vitro microleakage of composite restorations prepared by Er:YAG/Er,Cr:YSGG lasers and conventional drills associated with two adhesives systems. J Adhes Dent 11(3):221–229

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Yazici AR, Yıldırım Z, Antonson SA, Kilinc E, Koch D, Antonson DE, Dayangaç B, Ozgünaltay G (2010) Comparison of the Er,Cr:YSGG laser with a chemical vapour deposition bur and conventional techniques for cavity preparation: a microleakage study. Lasers Med Sci. doi:10.1007/s10103-010-0833-6

  41. Navarro RS, Gouw-Soares S, Cassoni A, Haypek P, Zezell DM, de Paula EC (2010) The influence of erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser ablation with variable pulse width on morphology and microleakage of composite restorations. Lasers Med Sci 25(6):881–889

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kimyai S, Oskoee SS, Rafighi A, Valizadeh H, Ajami AA, Helali ZN (2010) Comparison of microleakage of three adhesive systems in class V composite restorations prepared with Er,Cr:YSGG laser. Photomed Laser Surg 28(4):505–510

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Celik C, Ozel Y, Bagis B, Erkut S (2010) Effect of laser irradiation and cavity disinfectant application on the microtensile bond strength of different adhesive systems. Photomed Laser Surg 28(2):267–272

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey

    Soley Arslan & Kaşad Pala

  2. Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey

    A. Rüya Yazici & Jale Görücü

  3. Department of Restorative Dentistry, University at Buffalo State University of New York School of Dental Medicine, Buffalo, NY, USA

    Donald E. Antonson & Sibel A. Antonson

  4. Department of Animal Science, S. Cikrikcioğlu Vocational College, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey

    Sibel Silici

  5. Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Hacettepe University, 06100, Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey

    A. Rüya Yazici

Authors
  1. Soley Arslan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Rüya Yazici
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jale Görücü
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kaşad Pala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Donald E. Antonson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sibel A. Antonson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sibel Silici
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Rüya Yazici.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arslan, S., Yazici, A.R., Görücü, J. et al. Comparison of the effects of Er,Cr:YSGG laser and different cavity disinfection agents on microleakage of current adhesives. Lasers Med Sci 27, 805–811 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-011-0980-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-011-0980-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation