Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Examining the driving forces in moving toward a low carbon society: an extended STIRPAT analysis for a fast growing vast economy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Amidst worldwide concern for global warming, this is now a big challenge to move toward low carbon society. Energy efficiency, energy mix and lifestyles are likely to play significant role in this journey. Using an extended STIRPAT model, namely STIRDEFPAT (stochastic impacts by regression on energy demand, energy mix, fossil fuel intensity, population, affluence and technology), this study aims to analyze the environmental impact of affluence and lifestyle changes through decomposition of energy demand, energy mix and fossil fuel intensity in a fast growing economy like India. Data period of this study is 1990–2016. The study employs ridge regression to fit the extended STIRPAT model. Empirical results show that all the impact factors included in the model have significant positive influence on carbon emission. However, the largest contributing factor is affluence having around 24% promoting impact on carbon emission. The positive attitude toward propagation of environmentally sensitive and green choice adaptive behavior along with clean technology and green energy mix is likely to be an effective strategy to restrain adverse impact on the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agras J, Chapman D (1999) A dynamic approach to the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. Ecol Econ 28(2):267–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akashi O, Hanaoka T (2012) Technological feasibility and costs of achieving a 50% reduction of global GHG emission by 2050: mid-term and long-term perspectives. Sust Sci 7(2):139–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam S, Fatima A, Butt MS (2007) Sustainable development in Pakistan in the context of energy consumption demand and environmental degradation. J Asian Econ 18(5):825–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birdsall N (1992) Another look at population and global warming. World bank country economics department working paper no. 1020, November

  • Bjorkstrom A (2001) Ridge regression and inverse problems, Stockholm University, Stockholm. Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (2001), annual report (Mumbai, CMIE)

  • Chikaraishi M, Fujiwara A, Kaneko S, Poumanyvong P, Komatsu S, Kalugin A (2014) The moderating effects of urbanization on carbon dioxide emissions: a latent class modeling approach. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 90(Part A):302–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland CJ (2003) Biophysical constraints to economic growth. In: Al Gobaisi D (ed) Encyclopedia of life support systems. EOLSS Publishers Co., Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Crompton P, Wu Y (2005) Energy consumption in China: past trends and future directions. Energy Economics 27(1):195–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dedeoglu D, Kaya H (2013) Energy use, exports, imports and GDP: new evidence from the OECD countries. Energy Policy 57:469–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz T, Rosa EA (1994) Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence and technology. Hum Ecol Rev 1:277–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz T, Rosa EA (1997) Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:175–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dinda S (2004) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecol Econ 49(4):431–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR, Holdren JP (1972) One-dimensional economy. Bull At Sci 28(5):16–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene WH (2000) Econometric analysis, 4th edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanaoka T, Kainuma M (2012) Low carbon transition in world regions: comparison of technological mitigation potential and costs in 2020 and 2030 through bottom up analysis. Sust Sci 7:117–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoerl A, Kennard R (1970) Ridge regression: biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics 12(1):55–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEA (2012) Energy use in energy use in kt of oil equivalent, International Energy Agency

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2006) IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Paris: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, United Nations Environment Programme, Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development, International Energy Agency

  • Johansen S, Jesulius K (1990) Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with applications to the demand for money. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 52:169–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liddle B (2009) Long-run relationship among transport demand, income, and gasoline price for the US. Transp Res Part D: Transp Environ 14(2):73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin S, Zhao D, Dora M (2009) Analysis of the environmental impact of China based on STIRPAT model. Environ Impact Assess Rev 29:341–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y (2009) Exploring the relationship between urbanization and energy consumption using ARDL (autoregressive distributed lag) and FDM (factor decomposition model). Energy 34:1846–1854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long AH, Xu ZM, Wang XH, Shang HY (2006) Impacts of population, affluence and technology on water footprint in China. Acta Ecol Sin 10:3358–3365

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma C, Stern D (2006) China’s changing energy intensity trend: a decomposition analysis. Working Papers in Economics, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

  • MacKinnon J (1991) Critical values for cointegration tests, in long run economic relationships. In: Engle RF, Granger CWJ (eds) Readings in Cointegration. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 267–277

  • Marquardt DW (1970) Generalized inverses, ridge regression, biased linear estimation, and nonlinear estimation. Technometrics 12:256–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee K (2008) Energy use efficiency in the Indian manufacturing sector: an interstate analysis. Energy Policy 36(2):662–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD Environmental Outlook to 2050: The Consequences of Inaction (2012). www.oecd.org

  • Pachauri RK (2004) The future of India’s economic growth: the natural resources and energy dimension. Futures 36(6/7):703–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponce D, Julian D (2014) Relationship between Urbanization and CO2 emissions depends on income level and policy marshal. Environ Sci Technol 48(7):3632–3639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poumanyvong P, Kaneko S (2010) Does urbanization lead to less energy use and lower CO2 emissions? A cross-country analysis. Ecol Econ 70(2):434–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafiq S, Salim R (2009) Temporal causality between energy consumption and income in six Asian emerging countries. Appl Econ Q 55(4):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosa EA, Dietz T (1998) Climate change and society: speculation, construction and scientific investigation. Int Sociol 13(4):421–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosa EA, York R, Dietz T (2004) Reflections on the STIRPAT research program, Newsletter of the Section on Environment and Technology of the American Sociological Association, pp 1–2

  • Salim R, Shafiei S (2014) Urbanization and renewable and non-renewable energy consumption in OECD countries: an empirical analysis. Econ Model 38:581–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi A (2003) The impact of population pressure on global carbon dioxide emissions, 1975–1996, evidence from pooled cross-country data. Ecol Econ 44(1):29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silveria FC, Luken RA (2008) Global overview of industrial energy intensity. Energy Policy 36:2658–2664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims AC (1980) Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica 48:1–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spash CL (2002) Greenhouse economics: value and ethics. Rutledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stern DI (2004) The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev 32(8):1419–1439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Climate Change Conference (7–18 December 2009) United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), Bella Center in Copenhagen, Denmark

  • Vance L, Eason T, Cabezas H (2015) Energy sustainability: consumption, efficiency and environmental impact. Clean Techn Environ Policy 17:1781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voigt A, Sandrine B, Dufresne JL, Stevens B (2014) Theradiative impact of clouds on the shift of the intertropical convergence zone. Geophys Res Lett 41(12):4308–4315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang LM, He KL (2006a) Analysis of temporal variation of environmental impact based on STIRPAT model—a case study of energy consumption in China. J Nat Resour 6:862–869

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang LM, He KL (2006b) Analysis of temporal variation of environmental impact based on STIRPAT model—a case study of energy consumption in China. J Nat Resour 6:862–869 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang P, Wu W, Zhu B, Wei Y (2013) Examining the impact factors of energy-related CO2 emissions using the STIRPAT model in Guangdong Province, China. Appl Energy 106:65–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson D, Purushothaman R (2003) Dreaming with BRICs: the path to 2050 global economics, economic research from the GS financial workbench (Paper No. 99)

  • York R, Rosa EA, Dietz T (2003) STIRPAT, IPAT and IMPACT: analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecol Econ 46:351–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zilio M, Recalde M (2011) GDP and environment pressure: the role of energy in Latin America and the Caribbean. Energy Policy 39(12):7941–7949

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management Studies, National Institute of Technology Durgapur, Durgapur, 713209, India

    Mousumi Roy

  2. Department of Chemical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Durgapur, Durgapur, 713209, India

    Sanghita Basu & Parimal Pal

Authors
  1. Mousumi Roy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sanghita Basu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Parimal Pal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mousumi Roy.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 10 and 11.

Table 10 Carbon dioxide emission and environmental impact factors (1990–2016).
Full size table
Table 11 Exogeneity block Test
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roy, M., Basu, S. & Pal, P. Examining the driving forces in moving toward a low carbon society: an extended STIRPAT analysis for a fast growing vast economy. Clean Techn Environ Policy 19, 2265–2276 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-017-1416-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-017-1416-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation