Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Low percentages of measles vaccination coverage with two doses of vaccine and low herd immunity levels explain measles incidence and persistence of measles in the European Union in 2017–2018

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several factors may explain why measles persisted in the European Union in 2017–2018. The study assessed mean measles vaccination coverage and anti-measles herd immunity levels in the target measles vaccination population in countries of the European Union during the 2015–2017 period. The study found that the measles vaccination coverage with two doses of vaccine was < 95% in 28 (96.5%) countries, and that the prevalence of individuals with vaccine-induced measles protection in the target vaccination population was lower than the herd immunity threshold of 94.4% in 22 (75.9%) countries during 2015–2017. The study found a significant negative correlation between the incidence of measles in 2017–2018 in different countries of the European Union and measles vaccination coverage with two doses of measles vaccine, prevalence of individuals with vaccine-induced measles protection and herd immunity levels in the target measles vaccination population during 2015–2017. Measles vaccination coverage and herd immunity levels did not improve from 2010–2015 to 2015–2017 in the European Union. Low percentages of measles vaccination coverage with two doses of vaccine and low herd immunity levels could explain measles incidence in countries of the European Union in 2017–2018. New measles prevention strategies should be developed to increase measles vaccination coverage and herd immunity levels in the European Union.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization (WHO) (2012) Global measles and rubella strategic plan: 2012–2020. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  2. Moss WJ, Strebel P (2011) Biological feasibility of measles eradication. J Infect Dis 204([supple 1]):S47–S53

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. World Health Organization (WHO) (2003) Strategic plan for measles and congenital rubella infection in the WHO European region. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  4. WHO. (2015–2018) Centralized Information System for Infectious Diseases (CISID). Measles-Number of cases. Available from: http://data.euro.who.int/cisid/Default.aspx?TabID=488389. Accessed 12 Mar 2019

  5. WHO. Centralized Information System for Infectious Diseases (CISID). Measles-Number of hospitalizations, 2015–2018. Available from: http://data.euro.who.int/cisid/?TabID=488387. Accessed 12 Mar 2019

  6. WHO. Centralized Information System for Infectious Diseases (CISID). Measles-Number of deaths, 2015–2018. Available from: http://data.euro.who.int/cisid/?TabID=488391. Accessed 12 Mar 2019

  7. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) (2018) Monthly measles and rubella monitoring, February 2018. ECDC, Stockholm Available from: https://ecdc.europa.eu/sites/portal/files/documents/Monthly/Measles%20and%20Rubella%20monitoring%20report%20%20February%202018.pdf (Accessed 12 March 2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) (2019) Monthly measles and rubella monitoring report, February 2019. ECDC, Stockholm Available from: https://ecdc.europa.eu/sites/portal/files/documents/measles-rubella-monthly-monitoring-report-february-2019.pdf (Accessed 12 March 2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe (2014) Eliminating measles and rubella. Framework for the verification process in the WHO European Region. Copenhagen, WHO Regional Office for Europe. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/247356/Eliminating-measles-and-rubella-Framework-for-the-verification-process-in-the-WHO-European-Region.pdf

  10. Muscat M, Bang H, Wohlfahrt J, Glismann S, Mølbak K, EUVAC.NET Group (2009) Measles in Europe: an epidemiological assessment. Lancet 373:383–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61849-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) Measles: recommended vaccination. https://vaccine-schedule.ecdc.europa.eu/Scheduler/ByDisease?SelectedDiseaseId=8&SelectedCountryIdByDisease=-1

  12. Plans P (2013) New preventive strategy to eliminate measles, mumps and rubella from Europe based on the serological assessment of herd immunity levels is the population. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 32:961–996

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Anderson RM (1992) The concept of herd immunity and the design of community-based immunization programmes. Vaccine 10:928–935

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Plans P, Torner N, Godoy P, Jané M (2014) Lack of herd immunity against measles in individuals aged <35 years could explain re-emergence of measles in Catalonia (Spain). Int J Infect Dis 18:81–83 Available from: http://download.journals.elsevierhealth.com/pdfs/journals/12019712/PIIS120197121300307X.pdf

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Plans-Rubio P (2017) Why does measles persist in Europe? Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 36(10):1899–1906

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. World Health Organization (1985-2018) WHO-UNICEF estimates of MCV1 coverage [internet]. WHO, Geneva [accessed 29 January 2019]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/immunization_monitoring/globalsummary/timeseries/tswucoveragemcv1.html

  17. World Health Organization (1985-2018) WHO-UNICEF estimates of MCV2 coverage [internet]. WHO, Geneva [accessed 29 January 2019] Available from: http://apps.who.int/immunization_monitoring/globalsummary/timeseries/tswucoveragemcv2.html

  18. Anderson RM, May RM (1991) Infectious diseases of humans: dynamics and control. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gay NJ (2003) The theory of measles elimination: implications for the design of elimination strategies. J Infect Dis 189(Suppl 1):S27–S35

    Google Scholar 

  20. Guerra F, Bolotin S, Lim G, Heffernan J, Deeks SL, Li Y, Crowcroft NS (2017) The basic reproduction number (Ro) of measles: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis:e420–e428. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30307-9

  21. Demicheli V, Rivetti A, Debalini MG, Di Pietrantonj C (2012) Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella in children (review). The Cochrane library issue 2. Accesible from: https://www.princeton.edu/~sswang/demicheli_pietrantonj12_cochrane_report_MMR-risks.pdf

  22. Marin M, Nguyen HQ, Langidrik JR, Edwards R, Briand K, Papania MJ, Seward JF, LeBaron CW (2006) Measles transmission and vaccine effectiveness during a large outbreak on a densely populated island: implications for vaccination policy. Clin Infect Dis 42:315–319. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1086/498902

  23. Plans-Rubió P (2012) Evaluation of the establishment of herd immunity in the population by means of serological surveys and vaccination coverage. Hum Vaccin Immunother 8:184–188 Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.4161/hv.18444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. McBrien J, Murphy J, Gill D, Cronin M, O’Donovan C, Cafferkey MT (2000) Measles outbreak in Dublin. Pediatr Infect Dis 22:580–584

    Google Scholar 

  25. Poland GA, Jacobson RM (2011) The age-old struggle against the antivaccinationists. Ned Engl J Med 364:97–99 Available from: http://www.edwardjennersociety.org/wp-content/uploads/NEJM.pdf

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Prevention of Measles, Rubella, Congenital Rubella Syndrome, and Mumps, 2013: Summary recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) (2013) MMWR 62(RR04);1–34. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr6204.pdf

  27. Roberts MG, Tobias MI (2000) Predicting and preventing measles epidemics in New Zealand: application of a mathematical model. Epidemiol Infect 124:279–287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang B, Russell ML, Moss L, Fonseca K, Earn DJD, Aoki F et al (2016) Effect of influenza vaccination of children on infection rate in Hutterite communities: follow-up study of a randomized trial. PLoS One 11(12):e0167281. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Burton A, Monasch R, Lautenbach B, Gacic-Dobo M, Maryanne N, Karimov R, Wolfson L, Jones G, Birmingham M (2009) WHO and UNICEF estimates of national infant immunization coverage: methods and processes. Bull WHO 87:535–541. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.08.053819

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pannuti CS, Morello RJ, De Moraes JC, Curti SP, Afonso AMS, Camargo MCC, De Souza VAUF (2004) Identification of primary and secondary measles vaccine failures by measurement of immunoglobulin G avidity in measles cases during the 1997 São Paulo epidemic. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 11:119–122

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. De Quadros CA, Hersh BS, Nogueira AC, Carrasco PA, da Silveira CM (1998) Measles eradication: experience in the Americas. Bull WHO 76(Suppl 2):47–52

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ion-Nedelcu N, Craciun D, Pitigoi D, Popa M, Hennessey K, Roure C, Aston R, Zimmermann G, Pelly M, Gay N, Strebel P (2001) Measles elimination: a mass immunization campaign in Romania. Am J Public Health 91:1042–1045

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The average vaccination coverage for the first, the second, and two doses of measles containing vaccine in countries of the WHO European region and in the 30 countries of the European Union were calculated using the information of the WHO on “Reported estimates of MCV1 coverage”, and “Reported estimates of MCV2 coverage”:

1. http://apps.who.int/immunization_monitoring/globalsummary/timeseries/tswucoveragemcv1.html

2. http://apps.who.int/immunization_monitoring/globalsummary/timeseries/tswucoveragemcv2.html

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health of Catalonia, Public Health Agency of Catalonia, Roc Boronat 83-95, 008005, Barcelona, Spain

    Pedro Plans-Rubió

  2. CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain

    Pedro Plans-Rubió

Authors
  1. Pedro Plans-Rubió
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedro Plans-Rubió.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The work did not require an ethical approval.

Informed consent

The work did not require an informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Plans-Rubió, P. Low percentages of measles vaccination coverage with two doses of vaccine and low herd immunity levels explain measles incidence and persistence of measles in the European Union in 2017–2018. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 38, 1719–1729 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03604-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-019-03604-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation