Skip to main content
Log in

What is True Community-Acquired Urinary Tract Infection? Comparison of Pathogens Identified in Urine from Routine Outpatient Specimens and from Community Clinics in a Prospective Study

  • Concise Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to identify the true nature of community-acquired urinary tract infections, the uropathogens isolated from 100 patients with urinary tract infection included in a prospective study conducted in community clinics were compared to 244 isolates from outpatient urine specimens routinely submitted to the laboratory. Significant differences in both the spectrum of bacteria and their antibiograms were found between the two groups. Laboratory data analysis of uropathogens from outpatient urine specimens may not reflect the true bacteriology of urinary tract infections acquired in the community. Hence, surveys based on laboratory data alone may overestimate resistance rates, leading to misinformed choices being made when treatment is empirical.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhanel GG, Karlowsky JA, Harding GKM, Carrie A, Mazzulli T, Low DE, The Canadian Urinary Study Group, Hoban DJ (2000) A Canadian national surveillance study of urinary tract isolates from outpatients; comparison of the activities of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ampicillin, mecillinam, nitrofurantoin, and ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44:1089–1092

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barrett SP, Savage MA, Rebec MP, Guyot A, Andrews N, Shrimpton SB (1999) Antibiotic sensitivity of bacteria associated with community-acquired urinary tract infection in Britain. J Antimicrob Chemother 44:359–365

    Google Scholar 

  3. Daza R, Gutierrez J, Piedrola G (2001) Antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial strains isolated from patients with community-acquired urinary tract infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents 18:211–215

    Google Scholar 

  4. Colodner R, Keness Y, Chazan B, Raz R (2001) Antimicrobial susceptibility of community-acquired uropathogens in northern Israel. Int J Antimicrob Agents 18:189–192

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shepherd M (1997) Urine microscopy: Rant-Shepherd method. PHLS Microbiology Digest 14:236–237

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brumfitt W, Percival A, Williams JD (1973) Estimation of bacteria and white cells in urine. Association of Clinical Pathologist. Broadsheet 80

  7. Goldstein FW, Multicenter Study Group (2000) Antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial strains isolated from patients with community-acquired urinary tract infections in France. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 19:112–117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Y. Ti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ti, T.Y., Kumarasinghe, G., Taylor, M.B. et al. What is True Community-Acquired Urinary Tract Infection? Comparison of Pathogens Identified in Urine from Routine Outpatient Specimens and from Community Clinics in a Prospective Study. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 22, 242–245 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-003-0893-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-003-0893-7

Keywords

Navigation