Skip to main content
Log in

The place of Free Will: the freedom of the prisoner

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Debates about the concept of Free Will date back to ancient times. About 40 years ago, Benjamin Libet designed an experiment showing that the conscious intention to move is preceded by a specific pattern of brain activation. His finding suggested that unconscious processes determine our decisions. Libet-style experiments have continued to dominate the debate about Free Will, pushing some authors to argue that the existence of Free Will is a mere illusion. We believe that this dispute is because we often measure Free Will using arbitrary human decisions rather than deliberate actions. After reviewing the definition of Free Will and the related literature, we conclude that the scientific evidence does not disprove the existence of Free Will. However, our will encounters several constraints and limitations that should be considered when evaluating our deeds’ personal responsibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hume D (1739) Of liberty and necessity. Hume Texts Online. https://davidhume.org/texts/t/2/3/1. Accessed 6 Nov 2023

  2. Lavazza A, Inglese S (2015) Operationalizing and measuring (a kind of) free will (and responsibility). Towards a new framework for Psychology, Ethics, and Law. Riv Int Filos Psicol 6(1):37–55. https://doi.org/10.4453/rifp.2015.0004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brembs B (2011) Towards a scientific concept of free will as a biological trait: spontaneous actions and decision-making in invertebrates. Proc Biol Sci 278(1707):930–939. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.2325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nagel T (1974) What is it like to be a bat. Philos Rev 83(4):435–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lewis D (1973) Causation. J Philos 70(17):556–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Popper KR, Eccles JC (1977) The self and its brain: an argument for interactionism. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Wegner DM (2004) Précis of the illusion of conscious will. Behav Brain Sci 27:649–692. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x04000159

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cashmore AR (2010) The Lucretian swerve: the biological basis of human behavior and the criminal justice system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(10):4499–4504. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0915161107

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Harris S (2012) Free will. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Benini A (2022) Neurobiologia della volontà. Rafffaello Cortina Editore, Milano

  11. Greene J, Cohen J (2004) For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 359(1451):1775–1785. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1546

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Goldberg G (1985) The SMA: a “supplementary motor” or a “supramotor” area? Behav Brain Sci 8(4):567–616. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00045313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Buneo CA, Andersen RA (2006) The posterior parietal cortex: sensorimotor interface for the planning and online control of visually guided movements. Neuropsychologia 44(13):2594–2606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.10.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Heekeren HR, Marret S, Bandettini PA, Ungerleider LG (2004) A general mechanism for perceptual decision making in the human brain. Nature 431:859–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/10.1038/nature02966

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bickel WK, Miller ML, Yi R, Kowal BP, Lindquist DM, Pitcock JA (2007) Behavioral and neuroeconomics of drug addiction: competing neural systems and temporal discounting processes. Drug Alcohol Depend 90:S85-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.09.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lipton DM, Gonzales BJ, Citri A (2019) Dorsal striatal circuits for habits, compulsions and addictions. Front Syst Neurosci 13(28):1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2019.00028

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Daniel R, Pollmann S (2014) A universal role of the ventral striatum in reward-based learning: evidence from human studies. Neurobiol Learn Mem 214:90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2014.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Garrison J, Erdeniz B, Done J (2013) Prediction error in reinforcement learning: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 37:1297–1310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.03.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Graybiel AM, Grafton ST (2015) The striatum: where skills and habits meet. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 7(8):a021691. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a021691

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Libet B, Gleason CA, Wrigh TEW, Pearl DK (1983) Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential). The unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. Brain 106(Pt 3):623–642. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/106.3.623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Braun MN, Wessler J, Friese M (2021) A meta-analysis of Libet-style experiments. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 128:182–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.06.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Haynes JD (2011) Decoding and predicting intentions. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1224:9–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.05994.x

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pares-Pujolras E, Kim YW, Im CH, Haggard P (2019) Latent awareness: early conscious access to motor preparation processes is linked to the readiness potential. Neuroimage 202:116140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Soon CS, Brass M, Heinze HJ, Haynes JD (2008) Unconscious determinants of free decisions in the human brain. Nat Neurosci 11(5):543–545. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bode S, He AH, Soon CS, Trampel R, Turner R, Haynes JD (2011) Tracking the unconscious generation of free decisions using ultra-high field fMRI. PLoS ONE 6(6):e21612. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0021612

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Hirose S, Nambu I, Naito E (2018) Cortical activation associated with motor preparation can be used to predict the freely chosen effector of an upcoming movement and reflects response time: an fMRI decoding study. Neuroimage 183:584–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.060

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fried I, Mukamel R, Kreiman G (2011) Internally generated preactivation of single neurons in human medial frontal cortex predicts volition. Neuron 69(3):548–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.11.045

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Triggiani AI, Kreiman G, Lewis C, Maoz U, Mele A, Mudrik L, Roskies AL, Schurger A, Hallett M (2023) What is the intention to move and when does it occur? Neurosci Biobehav Rev 151:105199. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37119992

  29. Maoz U, Yaffe G, Koch C, Mudrik L (2019) Neural precursors of decisions that matter-an ERP study of deliberate and arbitrary choice. Elife 8. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.39787

  30. Schurger A, Sitt JD, Dehaene S (2012) An accumulator model for spontaneous neural activity prior to self-initiated movement. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109(42):E2904-2913. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1210467109

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Jo HG, Hinterberger T, Wittmann M, Borghardt TL, Schmidt S (2013) Spontaneous EEG fluctuations determine the readiness potential: is preconscious brain activation a preparation process to move? Exp Brain Res 231(4):495–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3713-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Libet B (1985) Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action. Behav Brain Sci 8:529–566. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00044903

  33. Brass M, Haggard P (2007) To do or not to do: the neural signature of self-control. J Neurosci 27(34):9141–9145. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0924-07.2007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Filevich E, Kuhn S, Haggard P (2013) There is no free won’t: antecedent brain activity predicts decisions to inhibit. PLoS ONE 8(2):e53053. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053053

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Farrer C, Franck N, Georgieff N, Frith CD, Decety J, Jeannerod M (2003) Modulating the experience of agency: a positron emission tomography study. Neuroimage 18(2):324–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1053-8119(02)00041-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Nahab FB, Kundu P, Gallea C, Kakareka J, Pursley R, Pohida T et al (2011) The neural processes underlying self-agency. Cereb Cortex 21(1):48–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhq059

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Voon V, Gallea G, Hattori N, Bruno M, Ekanayake V, Hallett M (2010) The involuntary nature of conversion disorder. Neurology 74(3):223–228. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181ca00e9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Preston C, Newport R (2008) Misattribution of movement agency following right parietal TMS. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 3(1):26–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsm036

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Ritterband-Rosenbaum A, Karabanov AN, Christensen MS, Nielsen JB (2014) 10 Hz rTMS over right parietal cortex alters sense of agency during self-controlled movements. Front Hum Neurosci 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00471

  40. Chambon V, Moore JW, Haggard P (2014) TMS stimulation over the inferior parietal cortex disrupts prospective sense of agency. Brain Struct Funct 220(6):3627–3639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-014-0878-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Babinski J (1914) Contribution à l‘étude des troubles mentaux dans l’hémiplégie organique cérébrale (Anosognosie). Rev Neurol 27:845–848

    Google Scholar 

  42. Feinberg TE, Haber LD, Leeds NE (1990) Verbal asomatognosia. Neurology 40(9):1391–1394. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.40.9.1391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Feinberg TE, Venneri A, Simone AM, Fan Y, Northoff G (2010) The neuroanatomy of asomatognosia and somatoparaphrenia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 81(3):276–281. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2009.188946

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Pugnaghi M, Molinari M, Panzetti P, Nichelli PF, Zamboni G (2012) “My sister’s hand is in my bed”: a case of somatoparaphrenia. Neurol Sci 33(5):1205–1207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-011-0874-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Scepkowski LA, Cronin-Golomb A (2003) The alien hand: cases, categorizations, and anatomical correlates. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev 2(4):261–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582303260119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Brugger F, Galovic M, Weder BJ, Kagi G (2015) Supplementary motor complex and disturbed motor control - a retrospective clinical and lesion analysis of patients after anterior cerebral artery stroke. Front Neurol 6:209. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2015.00209

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Wegner DM (2003) The mind’s best trick: how we experience conscious will. Trends Cogn Sci 7(2):65–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00002-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Nahmias E (2005) Agency, authorship, and illusion. Conscious Cogn 14(4):771–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2005.07.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kihlstrom JF (2004) An unwarrantable impertinence. Behav Brain Sci 27(5):666–667. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x04300154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. De Monticelli R (2010) Che cos’è una scelta? Fenomenologia e neurobiologia. In: De Caro M, Lavazza A, Sartori G (eds) Le neuroscienze e il mistero del libero arbitrio. Codice Edizioni, Torino

  51. Mudrik L, Faivre N, Koch C (2014) Information integration without awareness. Trends Cogn Sci 18(9):488–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.04.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Tononi G, Albantakis L, Boly M, Cirelli C, Koch C (2022) Only what exists can cause: an intrinsic view of free will. https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.02069. Accessed 8 May 2023

  53. Vergara VM, Norgaard M, Miller R, Beaty RE, Dhakal K, Dhamala M et al (2021) Functional network connectivity during Jazz improvisation. Sci Rep 11(1):19036. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98332-x

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Mudrik L, Arie IG, Amir Y, Shir Y, Hieronymi P, Maoz U et al (2022) Free will without consciousness? Trends Cogn Sci 26(7):555–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.03.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Bouchard TJJ, McGue M (2003) Genetic and environmental influences on human psychological differences. J Neurobiol 54(1):4–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/neu.10160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Zwir I, Arnedo J, Del-Val C, Pulkki-Raback L, Konte B, Yang SS et al (2020) Uncovering the complex genetics of human character. Mol Psychiatry 25(10):2295–2312. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-018-0263-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Farahany NA, Bernet W (2006) Behavioural genetics in criminal cases: past, present, and future. Genomics Soc Policy 2(1):72–79

    Google Scholar 

  58. Caspi A, McClay J, Moffitt TE, Mill J, Martin J, Craig IW et al (2002) Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science 297(5582). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1072290

  59. Feresin E (2009) Lighter sentence for murderer with ‘bad genes.’ Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/news.2009.1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Forti G (1983) Il piccolo almanacco di Radetzky. Adelphi, Milano

  61. Dennett D (2014) Daniel Dennett on free will worth wanting. In: Edmonton D, Warburton N (eds) Philosophy bites again. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  62. Leotti LA, Iyengar SS, Ochsner KN (2010) Born to choose: the origins and value of the need for control. Trends Cogn Sci 14(10):457–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.08.001

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The authors contributed equally to this work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolo F. Nichelli.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The paper reflects the authors’ own research and analysis in a truthful and complete manner.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nichelli, P.F., Grafman, J. The place of Free Will: the freedom of the prisoner. Neurol Sci 45, 861–871 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-023-07138-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-023-07138-4

Keywords

Navigation