Skip to main content
Log in

When are egg-rejection cues perceived? A test using thermochromic eggs in an avian brood parasite host

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

At the core of recognition systems research are questions regarding how and when fitness-relevant decisions made. Studying egg-rejection behavior by hosts to reduce the costs of avian brood parasitism has become a productive model to assess cognitive algorithms underlying fitness-relevant decisions. Most of these studies focus on how cues and contexts affect hosts’ behavioral responses to foreign eggs; however, the timing of when the cues are perceived for egg-rejection decisions is less understood. Here, we focused the responses of American robins Turdus migratorius to model eggs painted with a thermochromic paint. This technique modified an egg’s color with predictably varying temperatures across incubation: at the onset of incubation, the thermochromic model egg was cold and perceptually similar to a static blue model egg (mimicking the robin’s own blue–green egg color), but by the end of an incubation bout, it was warm and similar to a static beige egg (mimicking the ground color of the egg of the robin’s brood parasite, the brown-headed cowbird Molothrus ater). Thermochromic eggs were rejected at statistically intermediate rates between those of the static blue (mostly accepted) and static beige (mostly rejected) model eggs. This implies that at the population level, egg-rejection relevant cues are not perceived solely when arriving to or solely when departing from the nest. We also found that robins rejected their own eggs more often when exposed to color-changing model eggs relative to static eggs, suggesting that recognizing variable foreign eggs entails costly rejection errors for this host species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antonov A, Stokke BG, Moksnes A, Roskaft E (2008) Getting rid of the cuckoo Cuculus canorus egg: why do hosts delay rejection? Behav Ecol 19:100–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Ban M, Moskat C, Barta Z, Hauber ME (2013) Simultaneous viewing of own and parasitic eggs is not required for foreign egg rejection by a cuckoo host. Behav Ecol 24:1014–1021

    Google Scholar 

  • Batista G, Johnson JL, Dominguez E, Costa-Mattioli M, Pena JL (2016) Translational control of auditory imprinting and structural plasticity by eIF2α. eLife 5:e17197

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DLM, Hauber ME (2010) Conspecific-only experience during development reduces the strength of heterospecific song discrimination in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata): a behavioural test of the optimal acceptance threshold hypothesis. J Ornithol 151:379–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves EM, Green PA, Zipple MN, Peters S, Johnsen S, Nowicki S (2018) Categorical perception of colour signals in a songbird. Nature 560:365–367

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Croston R, Hauber ME (2014) Spectral tuning and perceptual differences do not explain the rejection of brood parasitic eggs by American robins (Turdus migratorius). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68:351–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Croston R, Hauber ME (2015) Experimental shifts in intraclutch egg color variation do not affect egg rejection in a host of a non-egg-mimetic avian brood parasite. PLoS One 10:e0121213

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dainson M, Hauber ME, Lopez AV, Grim T, Hanley D (2017) Does contrast between eggshell ground and spot coloration affect egg rejection? Sci Nat 104:54

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB, de Brooke ML (1989) An experimental study of co-evolution between the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, and its host. I. Host egg discrimination. J Anim Ecol 58:207–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB, de Brooke ML, Kacelnik A (1996) Recognition errors and probability of parasitism determine whether reed warblers should accept or reject mimetic cuckoo eggs. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:925–931

    Google Scholar 

  • Grim T, Samas P, Moskat C, Kleven O, Honza M, Moksnes A, Roskaft E, Stokke BG (2011) Constraints on host choice: why do parasitic birds rarely exploit some common potential hosts? J Anim Ecol 80:508–518

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley D, Sulc M, Brennan P, Hauber ME, Grim T, Honza M (2016) Dynamic egg colour mimicry. Ecol Evol 6:4192–4202

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley D, Grim T, Igic B, Samas P, Lopez AV, Shawkey MD, Hauber ME (2017) Egg discrimination along a gradient of natural variation in eggshell coloration. Proc R Soc Lond B 284:20162592

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley D, Lopez AV, Fiorini VD, Reboreda JC, Grim T, Hauber ME (2019) Variation in multicomponent recognition cues alters egg rejection decisions: a test of the optimal acceptance threshold hypothesis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 374:20180195

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauber ME (2003) Egg-capping is a cost paid by hosts of interspecific brood parasites. Auk 120:860–865

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauber ME, Moskat C, Ban M (2006) Experimental shift in hosts’ acceptance threshold of inaccurate-mimic brood parasite eggs. Biol Lett 2:177–180

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hauber ME, Tong L, Ban M, Croston R, Grim T, Waterhouse GIN, Shawkey MD, Barron AB, Moskat C (2015) The value of artificial stimuli in behavioral research: making the case for egg rejection studies in avian brood parasitism. Ethology 121:521–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Honza M, Prochazka P, Morongova K, Capek M, Jelinek V (2011) Do nest light conditions affect rejection of parasitic eggs? A test of the light environment hypothesis. Ethology 117:539–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Igic B, Nunez V, Voss HU, Croston R, Aidala Z, Lopez AV, Van Tatenhove A, Holford ME, Shawkey MD, Hauber ME (2015) Using 3D printed eggs to examine the egg-rejection behaviour of wild birds. PeerJ 3:e965

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lahti DC (2015) The limits of artificial stimuli in behavioral research: the umwelt gamble. Ethology 121:529–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang AK, Bollinger EK, Peer BD (2014) Effect of parasite-to-host egg ratio on egg rejection by a brown-headed cowbird host. Auk 131:694–701

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzana JC, Sealy SG (2001) Fitness costs and benefits of cowbird egg ejection by gray catbirds. Behav Ecol 12:325–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Luro AB, Hauber ME (2017) A test of the nest sanitation hypothesis for the evolution of foreign egg rejection in an avian brood parasite rejecter host species. Sci Nat 104:14

    Google Scholar 

  • Luro A, Igic B, Croston R, Lopez AV, Shawkey MD, Hauber ME (2018) Which egg features predict egg rejection responses in American robins? Replicating Rothstein’s (1982) study. Ecol Evol 8:1673–1679

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon BE, Eadie JM (2017) Why do birds lay eggs in conspecifics’ nests? In: Soler M (ed) Avian brood parasitism. Springer Nature, Heidelberg, pp 105–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Manna T, Moskat C, Hauber ME (2017) Ch. 24: Cognitive decision rules for egg rejection. In: Soler M (ed) Avian brood parasitism. Springer Nature, New York, pp 438–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayani-Paras F, Kilner RM, Stoddard MC, Rodriguez C, Drummond H (2015) Behaviorally induced camouflage: a new mechanism of avian egg protection. Am Nat 186:E91–E97

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mendelson TC, Fitzpatrick CL, Hauber ME, Pence CH, Rodgriguez RL, Safran RJ, Stern CA, Stevens JR (2016) Cognitive phenotypes and the evolution of animal decisions. Trends Ecol Evol 11:850–859

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno J, Lobato E, Morales J (2011) Eggshell blue-green colouration fades immediately after oviposition: a cautionary note about measuring natural egg colours. Ornis Fenn 88:51–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozgayova M, Prochazka P, Polacikova L, Honza M (2011) Closer clutch inspection—quicker egg ejection: timing of host responses toward parasitic eggs. Behav Ecol 22:46–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve HK (1989) The evolution of conspecific acceptance thresholds. Am Nat 133:407–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Roncalli G, Soler M, Ruiz-Raya F, Serrano-Martin AJ, Ibanez-Alamo JD (2019) Predation risk affects egg-ejection but not recognition in blackbirds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 73:56

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein SI (1975a) An experimental and teleonomic investiga- tion of avian brood parasitism. Condor 77:250–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein SI (1975b) Mechanisms of avian egg-recognition: do birds know their own eggs? Anim Behav 23:268–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein SI (1982) Mechanisms of avian egg recognition: which egg parameters elicit responses by rejecter species? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:229–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharf HM, Stenstrom K, Dainson M, Benson TJ, Fernandez-Juricic E, Hauber ME (2019) Mimicry-dependent lateralization in the visual inspection of foreign eggs by American robins. Biol Lett 15:20190351

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simons MJP, Verhulst S (2011) Zebra finch females prefer males with redder bills independent of song rate—a meta-analysis. Behav Ecol 22:755–762

    Google Scholar 

  • Soler M, Ruiz-Raya F, Roncalli G, Ibanez-Alamo JD (2017) Relationships between egg-recognition and egg-ejection in a grasp-ejector species. PLoS One 12:e0166283

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens M, Troscianko J, Spottiswoode CN (2013) Repeated targeting of the same hosts by a brood parasite compromises host egg rejection. Nat Commun 4:2475

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stokke B, Honza M, Moksnes A, Roskaft E, Rudolfsen G (2002) Costs associated with recognition and rejection of parasitic eggs in two European passerines. Behaviour 139:629–644

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderhoff N, Pyle P, Patten MA, Sallabanks R, James FC (2016) America Robin. In: Rodewald PG (ed) The birds of North America. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorobyev M, Osorio D (1998) Receptor noise as a determinant of colour thresholds. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:351–358

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

MEH, DH, and MD designed the study, DH and MD prepared the materials, MD and MEH collected field data, MD and AAL transcribed video observations, AL performed reflectance measurements and visual modelling, MEH conducted the statistical analyses, MEH wrote the first draft, and all authors contributed to the submitted versions of the manuscript. We thank the many landowners in Urbana who allowed us to work on their properties. The editor and the referees of the journal greatly improved on earlier versions of the manuscript.

Funding

Support for this project was provided by the Harley Jones Van Cleave Professorship at the University of Illinois (to MEH).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark E. Hauber.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

All authors declare no conflicts of interests.

Ethical approval

We followed the guidelines of the Animal Behavior Society for ethical treatment of research animals. The research was approved by the University of Illinois (IACUC #17049), the USA Department of the Interior (#23681), and the Illinois State Department of Natural Resources (#NH17.6099) issued to MEH.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (XLS 417 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (MOV 4975 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hauber, M.E., Dainson, M., Luro, A. et al. When are egg-rejection cues perceived? A test using thermochromic eggs in an avian brood parasite host. Anim Cogn 22, 1141–1148 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-019-01306-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-019-01306-w

Keywords

Navigation