Abstract
Bumblebees (Bombus spp.) foraging in the field typically reject flowers where they detect the olfactory footprints of previous visitors and hence avoid recently emptied inflorescences. A growing number of studies have begun to illustrate that associative learning shapes the development of this process, in both bumblebees and other bee species. This raises the question of what the default response to such marks is, but little is known about how inexperienced foragers use social information. Here, we offered flower-naive bees a choice between scent-marked flowers and unmarked alternatives and found that individuals neither avoided nor preferred marked flowers. Our findings provide no support for ‘hard-wired’ responses to scent marks in bumblebees and highlight the importance of associative learning in shaping social information use to match local circumstances.
References
Arenas A, Fernandez VM, Farina WM (2009) Associative learning during early adulthood enhances later memory retention in honeybees. Plos One 4(12):8. doi:e804610.1371/journal.pone.0008046
Bos N, Guerrieri FJ, D’Ettorre P (2010) Significance of chemical recognition cues is context dependent in ants. Anim Behav 80(5):839–844
Cameron SA (1981) Chemical signals in bumble bee foraging. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9(4):257–260
Chittka L (1998) Sensorimotor learning in bumblebees: long-term retention and reversal training. J Exp Biol 201(4):515–524
Crawley MJ (2007) The R book. Wiley, Chichester
Eltz T (2006) Tracing pollinator footprints on natural flowers. J Chem Ecol 32(5):907–915
Gamboa GJ (1996) Kin recognition in social wasps. In: Turillazzi S, West-Eberhart MJ (eds) Natural history and evolution of paper-wasps. Oxford Science, Oxford, pp 161–177
Giurfa M (1993) The repellent scent-mark of the honeybee Apis-Mellifera-Ligustica and its role as communication cue during foraging. Insect Soc 40(1):59–67
Giurfa M, Núñez JA (1992) Honeybees mark with scent and reject recently visited flowers. Oecologia 89:113–117
Giurfa M, Núñez JA, Chittka L, Menzel R (1995) Colour preferences of flower-naive honeybees. J Comp Physiol A-Sens Neural Behav Physiol 177(3):247–259
Goulson D, Hawson SA, Stout JC (1998) Foraging bumblebees avoid flowers already visited by conspecific or by other bumblebee species. Anim Behav 55:199–206
Goulson D, Stout JC, Langley J, Hughes WOH (2000) Identity and function of scent marks deposited by foraging bumblebees. J Chem Ecol 26(12):2897–2911
Goulson D, Chapman JW, Hughes WOH (2001) Discrimination of unrewarding flowers by bees; direct detection of rewards and use of repellent scent marks. J Insect Behav 14(5):669–678
Kachitvichyanukul V, Schmeiser BW (1988) Binomial random variate generation. Commun ACM 31:216–222
Leadbeater E, Chittka L (2005) A new mode of information transfer in foraging bumblebees? Curr Biol 15(12):R447–R448
Leadbeater E, Chittka L (2009) Bumble-bees learn the value of social cues through experience. Biol Lett 5(3):310–312. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2008.0692
Lunau K, Wacht S, Chittka L (1996) Colour choices of naive bumble bees and their implications for colour perception. J Comp Physiol A-Sens Neural Behav Physiol 178(4):477–489
Menzel R (2001) Behavioural and neural mechanisms of learning and memory as determinants of flower constancy. In: Chittka L, Thomson JD (eds) Cognitive ecology of pollination: animal behaviour and floral evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 21–40
Nieh JC (2004) Recruitment communication in stingless bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponini). Apidologie 35(2):159–182
Nieh JC (2009) Convergent evolution of food recruitment mechanisms in wasps and bees. In: Gadau J, Fewell J (eds) Organization of insect societies: from genome to sociocomplexity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 264–286
Plowright CMS, Simonds VM, Butler MA (2006) How bumblebees first find flowers: habituation of visual pattern preferences, spontaneous recovery, and dishabituation. Learn Motiv 37(1):66–78. doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2005.03.002
Raine NE, Ings TC, Ramos-Rodriguez O, Chittka L (2006) Intercolony variation in learning performance of a wild British bumblebee population (Hymenoptera : Apidae : Bombus terrestris audax). Entomol Gen 28(4):241–256
Reichle C, Aguilar I, Ayasse M, Jarau S (2011) Stingless bees (Scaptotrigona pectoralis) learn foreign trail pheromones and use them to find food. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol 197(3):243–249. doi:10.1007/s00359-010-0605-6
Rodríguez I, Gumbert A, Hempel de Ibarra N, Kunze J, Giurfa M (1994) Symmetry is in the eye of the ‘bee holder’: innate preference for bilateral symmetry in flower-naïve bumblebees. Naturwissenschaften 91(8):374–377
Saleh N, Chittka L (2006) The importance of experience in the interpretation of conspecific chemical signals. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61(2):215–220
Saleh N, Chittka L (2007) Bumblebees use incidental footprints to generate adaptive behaviour at flowers and nest. Arthropod-Plant Interact 1:119–127
Saleh N, Ohashi K, Thomson JD, Chittka L (2006) Facultative use of the repellent scent mark in foraging bumblebees: complex versus simple flowers. Anim Behav 71:847–854
Sanchez D, Nieh JC, Vandame R (2008) Experience-based interpretation of visual and chemical information at food sources in the stingless bee Scaptotrigona mexicana. Anim Behav 76:407–414. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.04.003
Schmitt U, Bertsch A (1990) Do foraging bumblebees scent mark food sources and does it matter? Oecologia 82:137–144
Schmitt U, Lubke G, Francke W (1991) Tarsal secretion marks food sources in bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Chemoecology 2:35–40
Seguin FR, Plowright CMS (2008) Assessment of pattern preferences by flower-naive bumblebees. Apidologie 39(2):215–224. doi:10.1051/apido:2007056
Stout JC, Goulson D (2001) The use of conspecific and interspecific scent marks by foraging bumblebees and honeybees. Anim Behav 62:183–189
Stout JC, Goulson D (2002) The influence of nectar secretion rates on the responses of bumblebees (Bombus spp.) to previously visited flowers. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52(3):239–246
Stout JC, Goulson D, Allen JA (1998) Repellent scent-marking of flowers by a guild of foraging bumblebees (Bombus spp.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 43(4–5):317–326
R Development Core Team (2008) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org
van Zweden J, D’Ettorre P (2010) Nestmate recognition in social insects and the role of hydrocarbons. In: Blomquist G, Bagneres AG (eds) Insect hydrocarbons. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Wilms J, Eltz T (2008) Foraging scent marks of bumblebees: footprint cues rather than pheromone signals. Naturwissenschaften 95(2):149–153. doi:10.1007/s00114-007-0298-z
Witjes S, Eltz T (2007) Influence of scent deposits on flower choice: experiments in an artificial flower array with bumblebees. Apidologie 38(1):12–18. doi:10.1051/apido:2006048
Witjes S, Eltz T (2009) Hydrocarbon footprints as a record of bumblebee flower visitation. J Chem Ecol 35(11):1320–1325. doi:10.1007/s10886-009-9720-7
Worden BD, Papaj DR (2005) Flower choice copying in bumblebees. Biol Lett 1(4):504–507
Yokoi T, Fujisaki K (2007) Repellent scent-marking behaviour of the sweat bee Halictus (Seladonia) aerarius during flower foraging. Apidologie 38(5):474–481. doi:10.1051/apido:2007034
Yokoi T, Fujisaki K (2009) Recognition of scent marks in solitary bees to avoid previously visited flowers. Ecol Res 24(4):803–809. doi:10.1007/s11284-008-0551-8
Acknowledgments
We thank Syngenta Bioline Bees, Weert, the Netherlands for kindly providing research bees for free.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leadbeater, E., Chittka, L. Do inexperienced bumblebee foragers use scent marks as social information?. Anim Cogn 14, 915–919 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-011-0423-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-011-0423-4