Skip to main content
Log in

Not using the obvious: desert ants, Melophorus bagoti, learn local vectors but not beacons in an arena

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many ant species travel large distances to find food, sometimes covering distances that are up to one million times their body length. Even when these foraging trips follow convoluted paths, the ants usually find their way back to their nest with precision (Wehner et al. in J Exp Biol 199:129–140, 1996). Ants have been shown to use both compass cues in the sky (pattern of polarised light) and landmarks on Earth to return to their nest. We present two experiments conducted on a solitary foraging ant: Melophorus bagoti in their natural habitat in the central Australian desert. Ants were trained and tested in situ. We tested foragers’ ability to exit a circular arena which provided an undifferentiated panorama. Artificial visual landmarks were located near a small exit. On tests in which path integration information was not available, foragers did not use artificial landmarks as beacons. Instead, they oriented in the learned exit direction, whether or not it pointed to the nest. We suggest that M. bagoti foragers learned a context-specific local vector when cued by the context of the circular arena. Our findings present the first evidence that M. bagoti foragers learn context-specific compass directions to chart their initial path home.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Batschelet E (1981) Circular statistics in biology. Academic Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard GD, Wehner R (1980) Intracellular optical physiology of the bee’s eye. I. Spectral sensitivity. J Comp Physiol A 137:193–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng K (2006) Arthropod navigation: ants, bees, crabs, spiders finding their way. In: Wasserman EA, Zentall TR (eds) Comparative cognition: experimental explorations of animal intelligence. Oxford University Press, NY, pp 189–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng K, Narendra A, Sommer S, Wehner R (2009) Traveling in clutter: navigation in the Central Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti. Behav Process 80:261–268. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2008.10.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collett M, Collett TS, Bisch S, Wehner R (1998) Local and global vectors in desert ant navigation. Nature 394:269–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Franks NR, Hooper JW, Dornhaus A, Aukett PJ, Hayward AL, Berghoff SM (2007) Reconnaissance and latent learning in ants. Proc R Soc B 274:1505–1509. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fukushi T (2001) Homing in wood ants, Formica japonica: Use of the skyline panorama. J Exp Biol 204:2063–2072

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fukushi T, Wehner R (2004) Navigation in wood ants Formica japonica: context dependent use of landmarks. J Exp Biol 207:3431–3439. doi:10.1242/jeb.01159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graham P, Cheng K (2009a) Which portion of the natural panorama is used for view-based navigation in the Australian desert ant? J Comp Physiol A 195:681–689. doi:10.1007/s00359-009-0443-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham P, Cheng K (2009b) Ants use the panoramic skyline as a visual cue during navigation. Curr Biol 19:R935–R937. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.08.015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graham P, Collett TS (2002) View-based navigation in insects: how wood ants (Formica rufa L.) look at and are guided by extended landmarks. J Exp Biol 205:2499–2509

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graham P, Collett TS (2006) Bi-directional route learning in wood ants. J Exp Biol 209:3677–3684. doi:10.1242/jeb.02414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graham P, Fauria K, Collett TS (2003) The influence of beacon-aiming on the routes of wood ants. J Exp Biol 206:535–541. doi:10.1242/jeb.00115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graham P, Durier V, Collett TS (2004) The binding and recall of snapshot memories in wood ants (Formica rufa L.). J Exp Biol 207:393–398. doi:10.1242/jeb.00771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris RA, Ibarra NH, Graham P, Collett TS (2005) Priming of visual route memories. Nature 438:302. doi:10.1038/438302a

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jammalamadaka SR, SenGupta A (2001) Topics in circular statistics. World Scientific, NJ

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler M, Wehner R (2005) Idiosyncratic route memories in desert ants, Melophorus bagoti: how do they interact with path integration vectors? Neurobiol Learn Mem 83:1–12. doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2004.05.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Macquart D, Garnier L, Combe M, Beugnon G (2006) Ant navigation en route to the goal: signature routes facilitate way-finding of Gigantiops destructor. J Comp Physiol A 192:221–231. doi:10.1007/s00359-005-0064-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mardia KV (1972) Statistics of directional data. Academic Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeman MA, Pratt SC, Franks NR (2002) Navigation using visual landmarks by the ant Leptothorax albipennis. Insectes Soc 49:203–208. doi:0020-1812/02/030203-06

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menzel R, Blakers R (1976) Colour receptors in the bee eye—morphology and spectral sensitivity. J Comp Physiol A 175:457–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller R (2002) Insects could exploit UV-green contrast for landmark navigation. J Theor Biol 214:619–631. doi:10.1006/jtbi.2001.2484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Narendra A (2007a) Homing strategies of the Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti I. Proportional path integration takes the ant half-way home. J Exp Biol 210:1798–1803. doi:10.1242/jeb.02768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Narendra A (2007b) Homing strategies of the Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti II. Interaction of the path integrator with visual cue information. J Exp Biol 210:1804–1812. doi:10.1242/jeb.02769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Narendra A, Si A, Sulikowski D, Cheng K (2007) Learning, retention and coding of nest-associated visual cues by the Australian desert ant, Melophorus bagoti. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1543–1553. doi:10.1007/s00265-007-0386-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson DJ, Judd PD, Cartwright BA, Collett TS (1999) Learning walks and landmark guidance in wood ants (Formica rufa). J Exp Biol 202:1831–1838

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen N (1972) The animal in its world. Harvard University Press, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Upton GJG, Fingleton B (1985) Spatial data analysis by example (vol. 2): categorical and directional data. Wiley, Toronto, ON

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilela EF, Jaffě K, Howse PE (1987) Orientation in leaf-cutting ants (Formicidae: Attini). Anim Behav 35:1443–1453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wehner R (1994) The polarization-vision project: championing organismic biology. Fortschritte der Zoologie (Progress in Zoology) 39:103–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner R (2003) Desert ant navigation: how miniature brains solve complex tasks. J Comp Physiol A 189:579–588. doi:10.1007/s00359-003-0431-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wehner R, Müller M (2006) The significance of direct sunlight and polarized skylight in the ant’s celestial system of navigation. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 103:12575–12579. doi:10.1073/pnas.0604430103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wehner R, Räber F (1979) Visual spatial memory in desert ants, Cataglyphis bicolor (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Experientia 35:1569–1571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wehner R, Srinivasan MV (1981) Searching behaviour of desert ants, genus Cataglyphis (Formicidae, Hymenoptera). J Comp Physiol A 142:315–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wehner R, Michel B, Antonsen P (1996) Visual navigation in insects: coupling of egocentric and geocentric information. J Exp Biol 199:129–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Wystrach A, Beugnon G (2009) Ants learn geometry and features. Curr Biol 19:61–66. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.11.054

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (2009) Biostatistical analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, NJ

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada discovery grant to MLS and an Australian Research Council Discovery Project grant to KC (DP0770300). We would like to thank the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Centre for Arid Zone Research, for allowing us to conduct field studies on their property. We would also like to thank the entire research team at the Alice Springs field station for their help with this project, especially Paul Graham, Antoine Wystrach, Sebastian Schwarz, and Patrick Schultheiss for their invaluable discussions and knowledge. We also thank Dawson Clary and the three anonymous reviewers for their clear and insightful comments that have greatly improved this manuscript. At the time they were conducted, these studies fully complied with the laws of Australia where they were performed.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest with the organizations that sponsored this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric L. G. Legge.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Legge, E.L.G., Spetch, M.L. & Cheng, K. Not using the obvious: desert ants, Melophorus bagoti, learn local vectors but not beacons in an arena. Anim Cogn 13, 849–860 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-010-0333-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-010-0333-x

Keywords

Navigation