Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Grey parrot numerical competence: a review

  • Review
  • Published:
Animal Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The extent to which humans and nonhumans share numerical competency is a matter of debate. Some researchers argue that nonhumans, lacking human language, possess only a simple understanding of small quantities, generally less than four. Animals that have, however, received some training in human communication systems might demonstrate abilities intermediate between those of untrained nonhumans and humans. Here I review data for a Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus) that has been shown to quantify sets of up to and including six items (including heterogeneous subsets) using vocal English labels, to comprehend these labels fully, and to have a zero-like concept. Recent research demonstrates that he can also sum small quantities. His success shows that he understands number symbols as abstract representations of real-world collections, and that his sense of number compares favorably to that of chimpanzees and young human children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Note that the estimation of larger versus smaller in the salamander study might have arisen from the amount of movement rather than of number.

  2. This percentage represented 106 matches of 108 vocalizations. As an additional control, the principal investigator made two transcriptions of a student, new to the lab, as he responded to the same type of questions as Alex. The first transcription was live; the second, made several days later, was of a tape from which all questions had been edited. The two transcriptions of the student's vocalizations matched to within 95.8% (68 of 71 vocalizations).

  3. If we indeed factored this possibility of error into our calculations, I would have to use much higher chance values for all the experiments. As noted, I always used the more conservative value of chance.

  4. On one trial during a comprehension study, Alex was asked “What object is purple?” when no purple object was present in an attempt to determine if he would use “none”; he requested a grape (Pepperberg 1990). Although the likelihood of his requesting that particular item was small (1/11 even if we restrict chance to foods he could label at the time rather than his entire repertoire), the request could simply have been one of his frequent requests for treats during sessions. We did not pursue this line of inquiry further.

  5. Alex's “none” is unlikely to be related to a child's “allgone”: He did not use the term after eating all the jelly beans or after tossing all the blocks to the floor, which is the common response of children.

  6. Other studies have used smaller quantities (e.g. 0–4, which are within what is generally accepted as the subitizing range), and will not be discussed because tasks involving these small quantities can be solved by perceptual mechanisms (see discussion in Beran 2004). Experiments with Alex specifically involved quantities >4 so as to test his capacities beyond the subitizing range.

  7. An example might help here: Let us assume that a bird can sing a song and can make a one-to-one correspondence between the notes in the song and various objects as they are placed in each pile \(\ldots\) and it gets a reward for choosing the pile with more “stuff”. So it might, for a given trial, sing “The itsy bitsy spider went up the water spout, down \(\ldots\)” for one pile and \(\ldots\)“The itsy bitsy spider went up the water spout, down came \(\ldots\)” for the other, and choose the pile associated with the longer song; in an “addition” study, it then adds one or two notes to the appropriate song depending on what is added to which set \(\ldots\) but has not a clue as to how many things are in each pile, merely still a sense of more versus less.

  8. Alexandrian Greeks, for example, used zero to denote the absence of quantity, but it did not function for them as a number (Kline, 1972).

  9. Some researchers are truly wedded to the accumulator model and others to object files, and considerable controversy exists as to which should prevail. At some point, every researcher must weigh the data on both sides and decide which are more convincing; I agree with Mix et al.

  10. A reviewer has suggested that Alex is using an accumulator that, over the course of the many years that he has been exposed to numbers, has been sharpened such that errors at discriminating neighboring numerosities have been reduced. Such would, of course, also be true for humans, and would be impossible to distinguish from counting for both humans and animals. I leave it to the readers of this paper to evaluate this possibility.

  11. Note definition of counting in the Introduction; Alex does not vocally tag items, which is why his behavior can only be considered “like” human counting.

  12. Note that Coull and Nobre (1998) suggest that the left IPS is more active in temporal attention and the right IPS in spatial attention, but Fias et al. (2003) find more activity in the left IPS for representation of symbolic and nonsymbolic magnitude. All cited studies do, however, implicate the IPS in numerical tasks.

References

  • Benoit L, Lehalle H, Jouen F (2004) Do young children acquire number words through subitizing or counting? Cogn Dev 19:291–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beran MJ (2001) Summation and numerousness judgements of sequentially presented sets of items by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 115:181–191

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beran MJ (2004) Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) respond to nonvisible sets after one-by-one addition and removal of items. J Comp Psychol 118:25–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beran MJ, Rumbaugh DM (2001) “Constructive” enumeration by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) on a computerized task. Anim Cogn 4:81–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bialystok E, Codd J (2000) Representing quantity beyond whole numbers: some, none and part. Can J Exp Psychol 54:117–128

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Biro D, Matsuzawa T (2001) Use of numerical symbols by the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): cardinals, ordinals, and the introduction of zero. Anim Cogn 4:193–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowmaker JK, Heath LA, Das D, Hunt DM (1994) Spectral sensitivity and opsin structure of avian rod and cone visual pigments. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 35:1708

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowmaker JK, Heath LA, Wilkie SE, Das D, Hunt DM (1996) Middle-wave cone and rod visual pigments in birds: spectral sensitivity and opsin structure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 37:S804

    Google Scholar 

  • Boysen ST (1993) Counting in chimpanzees: nonhuman principles and emergent properties of number. In: Boysen ST, Capaldi EJ (eds) The development of numerical competence: animal and human models. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 39–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Boysen ST, Berntson GG (1989) Numerical competence in a chimpanzee. J Comp Psychol 103:23–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boysen ST, Berntson GG (1990) The development of numerical skills in the chimpanzee. In: Parker ST, Gibson KR (eds) ‘Language’ and intelligence in monkeys and apes: comparative developmental perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 435–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Boysen ST, Hallberg KI (2000) Primate numerical competence: contributions toward understanding nonhuman cognition. Cogn Sci 24:423–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brannon EM, Terrace HS (1998) Ordering of the numerosities 1–9 by monkeys. Science 282:746–749

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brannon EM, Terrace HS (2000) Representation of the numerosities 1–9 by rhesus macaques. J Exp Psychol: Anim Behav Proc 26:31–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brannon EM, Wusthoff CJ, Gallistel CR, Gibbon J (2001) Numerical subtraction in the pigeon: evidence for a linear subjective number scale. Psychol Sci 12:238–243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Braun H (1952) Uber das Unterscheidungsvermögen unbenannter Anzahlen bei Papageien [Concerning the ability of parrots to distinguish unnamed numbers.] Z Tierpsychol 9:40–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Brysbaert M (1995) Arabic number reading: on the nature of the numerical scale and the origin of phonological recoding. J Exp Psychol: Gen 125:435–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth B (1995) Editorial. Math Cogn 1:1–2

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth B, Zorzi M, Girelli L, Jonckheere AR (2001) Storage and retrieval of addition facts: the role of number comparison. Q J Exp Psychol 54A:1005–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Call J (2000) Estimating and operating on discrete quantities in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). J Comp Psychol 114:136–147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carey S (2004) Bootstrapping & the origin of concepts. Dædalus Winter:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Clearfield M (2004) Infants' enumeration of dynamic displays. Cogn Dev 19:309–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colvin MK, Funnell MG, Gazzaniga MS (2005) Numerical processing in the two hemispheres: studies of a split-brain patient. Brain Cogn 57:43–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coull JT, Nobre A (1998) Where and when to pay attention: the neural systems for directing attention to spatial locations and to time intervals as revealed by both PET and fMRI. J Neurosci 18:7426–7435

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis H, Pérusse R (1988) Numerical competence in animals: definitional issues, current evidence, and a new research agenda. Behav Brain Sci 11:561–615

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene S (1997) The number sense. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene S (2001) Subtracting pigeons: logarithmic or linear? Psychol Sci 12:244–246

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene S, Changeux J (1993) Development of elementary numerical abilities: a neuronal model. J Cogn Neurosci 5:390–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene S, Cohen L (1994) Dissociable mechanisms of subitizing and counting: neuropsychological evidence from simultanoagnosis patients. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform 20:958–975

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene S, Spelke E, Pinel P, Stanescu R, Tsivkin S (1999) Sources of mathematical thinking: behavioral and brain imaging evidence. Science 284:970–974

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene S, Piazza M, Pinel P, Cohen L (2003) Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cogn Neuropsychol 20:487–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene S, Molko N, Cohen L, Wilson A (2004) Arithmetic and the brain. Cur Opin Neurobiol 14:218–224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Emmerton J, Lohmann A, Niemann J (1997) Pigeons’ serial ordering of numerosity with visual arrays. Anim Learn Behav 25:234–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigenson L (2005) A double-dissociation in infants' representations of object arrays. Cognition 95:B37–B48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feigenson L, Dehaene S, Spelke E (2004) Core systems of number. Trends Cogn Sci 8:307–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fias W, Lammertyn J, Reynvoet B, Dupont P, Orban GA (2003) Parietal representation of symbolic and nonsymbolic magnitude. J Cogn Neurosci 15:47–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuson KC (1988) Children's counting and concepts of number. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallistel CR (1988) Counting versus subitizing versus the sense of number. Behav Brain Sci 11:585–586

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallistel CR, Gelman R (1992) Preverbal and verbal counting and computation. Cognition 44:43–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman R, Gallistel CR (1986) The child's understanding of number, 2nd edn. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Glanville AD, Dallenbach KM (1929) The range of attention. Am J Psychol 41:207–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Göbel SM, Rushworth MFS (2004) Cognitive neuroscience: acting on numbers. Curr Biol 14:R517–R519

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Göbel SM, Rushworth MFS, Walsh V (2001a) rTMS disrupts the representation of small numbers in supramarginal gyrus. NeuroImage 13(Suppl 1):40

    Google Scholar 

  • Göbel SM, Walsh V, Rushworth MFS (2001b) The mental number line and the human angular gyrus. NeuroImage 14:1278–1289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Göbel SM, Johansen-Berg H, Behrens T, Rushworth MFS (2004) Response-selection-related parietal activation during number comparison. J Cogn Neurosci 16:1536–1551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Golinkoff RM, Hirsh-Pasek K, Cauley KM, Gordon L (1987) The eyes have it: lexical and syntactic comprehension in a new paradigm. J Child Lang 14:23–45

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon P (2004) Numerical cognition without words: evidence from Amazonia. Science 306:496–499

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gorsuch RL, Figueredo AJ (1991) Sequential canonical analysis as an exploratory form of path analysis. Paper presented at the American Evaluation Association Conference, October, Chicago, IL

  • Greeno JG, Riley MS, Gelman R (1984) Conceptual competence and children's counting. Cogn Psychol 16:94–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis ED, Güntürkün O, Bruce L, Csillag A, Karten H, Kuenzel W, Medina L, Paxinos G, Perkel DJ, Shimizu T, Striedter G, Wild JM, Ball GF, Dugas-Ford J, Durand SE, Hough GE, Husband S, Kubikova L, Lee DW, Mello CV, Powers A, Siang C, Smulders TV, Wada K, White SA, Yamamoto K, Yu J, Reiner A, Butler AB (2005) Avian brains and a new understanding of vertebrate evolution. Nat Rev Neurosci 6:151–159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jevons WS (1871) The power of numerical discrimination. Nature 3:281–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan KE, Brannon EM (2006) Weber's Law influences numerical representations in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Anim Cogn 9:159–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan K, Schadow J, Wuestenberg T, Heinze H-J, Jäncke L (2004) Different cortical activations for subjects using allocentric or egocentric strategies in a virtual navigation task. Brain Imaging 15:135–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman EL, Lord MW, Reese TW, Volkmann J (1949) The discrimination of visual number. Am J Psychol 62:498–525

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kawai N, Matsuzawa T (2000) Numerical memory span in a chimpanzee. Nature 403:39–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kilian A, Yaman S, von Fersen L, Güntürkün O (2003) A bottlenosed dolphin discriminates visual stimuli differing in numerosity. Learn Behav 31:133–142

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kline M (1972) Mathematical thought from ancient to modern times - Oxford University Press, New York

  • Koehler O (1943) ‘Zähl’-Versuche an einem Kolkraben und Vergleichsversuche an Menschen [Number assessment by a raven and comparative assessments by humans]. Z Tierpsychol 5:575–712

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehler O (1950) The ability of birds to ‘count’. Bull Anim Behav Soc 9:41–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemer C, Dehaene S, Spelke E, Cohen L (2003) Approximate quantities and exact number words: dissociable systems. Neuropsychologia 41:1942–1958

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lenneberg EH (1971) Of language, knowledge, apes, and brains. J Psychol Res 1:1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis KP, Jaffe S, Brannon EM (2005) Analog number representations in mongoose lemurs (Eulemur mongoz): evidence from a search task. Anim Cogn 8:247–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lögler P (1959) Versuche zur Frage des “Zahl” Vermögens an einem Graupapagei und Vergleichsversuche an Menschen [Experiments regarding the counting ability of a gray parrot and comparative experiments with humans]. Z Tierpsychol 16:179–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon BE (2003) Egg recognition and counting reduce costs of avian conspecific brood parasitism. Nature 422:495–499

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mandler G, Shebo BJ (1982) Subitizing: an analysis of its component processes. J Exp Psychol: Gen 111:1–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuzawa T (1985) Use of numbers by a chimpanzee. Nature 315:57–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McComb K, Packer C, Pusey A (1994) Roaring and numerical assessment in contests between groups of female lions, Pantera leo. Anim Behav 47:379–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meck W, Church R (1983) A mode control model of counting and timing processes. J Exp Psychol: Anim Behav Proc 9:320–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell RW, Yao P, Sherman PT, O’Regan M (1985) Discriminative responding of a dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) to differentially rewarded stimuli. J Comp Psychol 99:218–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mix K, Huttenlocher J, Levine SC (2002) Quantitative development in infancy and early childhood. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Murofushi K (1997) Numerical matching behavior by a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes): subitizing and analogue magnitude estimation. Jpn Psychol Res 39:140–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieder A, Miller EK (2003) Coding of cognitive magnitude: compressed scaling of numerical information in the primate prefrontal cortex. Neuron 37:149–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nieder A, Freedman DJ, Miller EK (2002) Representation of the quantity of visual items in the primate prefrontal cortex. Science 297:1708–1711

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olthof A, Roberts WA (2000) Summation of symbols by pigeons (Columba livia): the importance of number and mass of reward items. J Comp Psychol 114:158–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olthof A, Iden CM, Roberts WA (1997) Judgments of ordinality and summation of number symbols by squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus). J Exp Psychol: Anim Behav Proc 23:325–333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Orlov T, Yakovlev V, Amit D, Hochstein S, Zohary E (2002) Serial memory strategies in macaque monkeys: behavioral and theoretical aspects. Cerebral Cortex 12:306–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson DK, Pepperberg IM (1994) A comparative study of human and parrot phonation: I. Acoustic and articulatory correlates of vowels. JASA 96:634–648

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson DK, Pepperberg IM (1998) A comparative study of human and Grey parrot phonation: acoustic and articulatory correlates of stop consonants. JASA 103:2197–2213

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peignot P, Anderson JR (1999) Use of experimenter-given manual and facial cues by gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) in an object-choice task. J Comp Psychol 113:253–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM (1981) Functional vocalizations by an African Grey parrot. Z Tierpsychol 55:139–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM (1987) Evidence for conceptual quantitative abilities in the African Grey parrot: labeling of cardinal sets. Ethology 75:37–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM (1988) Comprehension of ‘absence’ by an African Grey parrot: learning with respect to questions of same/different. JEAB 50:553–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM (1990) Cognition in an African Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus): further evidence for comprehension of categories and labels. J Comp Psychol 104:41–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM (1992) Proficient performance of a conjunctive, recursive task by an African Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus). J Comp Psychol 106:295–305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM (1994) Evidence for numerical competence in an African Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus). J Comp Psychol 108:36–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM (1999) The Alex studies: cognitive and communicative abilities of Grey parrots. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM (2006a) Grey Parrot numerical abilities: addition and further experiments on a zero-like concept. J Comp Psychol 120:1–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM (2006b) Ordinality and transitive inference abilities of a Grey parrot. J Comp Psychol 120

  • Pepperberg IM, Brezinsky MV (1991) Acquisition of a relative class concept by an African Grey Parrot (Psittacus erithacus): discriminations based on relative size. J Comp Psychol 105:286–294

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg IM, Gordon JD (2005) Number comprehension by a Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus), including a zero-like concept. J Comp Psychol 119:197–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Premack D (1976) Intelligence in ape and man. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Premack D (1983) The codes of man and beast. Behav Brain Sci 6:125–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousselle L, Palmer E, Noël M-P (2004) Magnitude comparison in preschoolers: what counts? Influence of perceptual variables. J Exp Child Psychol 87:57–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rumbaugh DM, Savage-Rumbaugh ES, Hegel M (1987) Summation in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). J Exp Psychol: Anim Behav Proc 13:107–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rumbaugh DM, Savage-Rumbaugh ES, Pate JL (1988) Addendum to “Summation in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes).” J Exp Psychol: Anim Behav Proc 14:118–120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Santos LR, Barnes JL, Mahajan N (2005) Expectations about numerical events in four lemur species (Eulemur fulvus, Eulemur mongoz, Lemur catta and Varecia rubra). Anim Cogn 8:253–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Savage-Rumbaugh ES, Rumbaugh DM, Boysen S (1980) Do apes use language? Am Sci 68:49–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage-Rumbaugh S, Murphy J, Sevcik RA, Brakke KE, Williams SL, Rumbaugh DM (1993) Language comprehension in ape and child. Mono Soc Res Child Dev 233:1–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Seibt U (1982) Zahlbegriff und Zählverhalten bei Tieren: (Neue Versuche und Deutungen). Z Tierpsych 60:325–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Shumaker RW, Palkovich AM, Beck BB, Guagnano GA, Morowitz H (2001) Spontaneous use of magnitude discrimination and ordination by the orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus). J Comp Psychol 115:385–391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel LS (1982) The development of quantity concepts: perceptual and linguistic factors. In: Brainerd CJ (ed) Children's logical and mathematical cognition. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 123–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegler RS (1987) The perils of averaging data over strategies: an example from children's addition. J Exp Psychol: Gen 12:349–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon TJ (1999) The foundations of numerical thinking in a brain without numbers. TINS 3:363–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Smirnova AA, Lazareva OF, Zorina ZA (2000) Use of number by crows: investigation by matching and oddity learning. JEAB 73:163–176

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith BR, Piel AK, Candland DK (2003) Numerity of a socially housed hamadryas baboon (Papio hamadryas) and a socially housed squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus). J Comp Psychol 117:217–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sophian C (1995) Children's numbers. Brown and Benchmark, Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  • Spelke ES, Tsivkin S (2001) Language and number: a bilingual training study. Cognition 78:45–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Starkey P, Cooper RG (1995) The development of subitizing in young children. Br J Dev Psychol 13:399–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulkowski GM, Hauser MD (2001) Can rhesus monkeys spontaneously subtract? Cognition 79:239–262

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Templeton CN, Greene E, Davis K (2005) Allometry of alarm calls: black-capped chickadees encode information about predator size. Science 5730:1934–1937

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson NS (1968) Counting and communication in crows. Commun Behav Biol 2:223–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Trick L, Pylyshyn Z (1989) Subitizing and the FNST spatial index model. University of Ontario, Ontario, Canada, COGMEM #44

  • Trick L, Pylyshyn Z (1994) Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychol Rev 101:80–102

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uller C, Carey S, Huntley-Fenner G, Klatt L (1999) What representations might underlie infant numerical knowledge? Cogn Dev 14:1–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vick S-J, Anderson JR (2003) Use of human visual attention cues by olive baboons (Papio anubis) in a competitive task. J Comp Psychol 117:209–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • von Glasersfeld E (1982) Subitizing: the role of figural patterns in the development of numerical concepts. Arch Psychol 50:191–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh V (2003) Cognitive neuroscience: numerate neurons. Curr Biol 13:R447–R448

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe S, Huber L (2006) Animal logics: decision in the absence of human language. Anim Cogn 9 DOI 10.1007/s10071-006-0043-6

  • Waxman SR, Markow DB (1995) Words as invitations to form categories: evidence from 12- to 13-month-old infants. Cogn Psychol 29:257–302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman HM, Miller KF (1986) Thinking about nothing: development of concepts of zero. Br J Dev Psychol 4:31–42

    Google Scholar 

  • West RE, Young RJ (2002) Do domestic dogs show any evidence of being able to count? Anim Cogn 5:183–186

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfgramm J, Todt D (1982) Pattern and time specificity in vocal responses of blackbirds Turdus merula L. Behaviour 81:264–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynn K (1990) Children's understanding of counting. Cognition 36:155–193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xia L, Siemann M, Delius JD (2000) Matching of numerical symbols with number of responses by pigeons. Anim Cogn 3:35–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xia L, Emmerton J, Siemann M, Delius JD (2001) Pigeons (Columba livia) learn to link numerosities with symbols. J Comp Psychol 115:83–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu F (2003) Numerosity discrimination in infants: evidence for two systems of representations. Cognition 89:B15–B25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, 02454, USA

    Irene M. Pepperberg

  2. Department of Psychology, Harvard University, William James Hall, Vision Science Center, 33 Kirkland Street, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA

    Irene M. Pepperberg

Authors
  1. Irene M. Pepperberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irene M. Pepperberg.

Additional information

This contribution is part of the special issue “Animal Logics” (Watanabe and Huber 2006).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pepperberg, I.M. Grey parrot numerical competence: a review. Anim Cogn 9, 377–391 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-006-0034-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-006-0034-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation