Skip to main content
Log in

Non-invasive imaging for predicting labial salivary gland biopsy outcomes in patients with suspected primary Sjögren syndrome

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Clinical Rheumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To identify the value of salivary gland ultrasound (SGUS) combined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance sialography (MRS) in predicting the results of labial salivary gland biopsy (LSGB) in patients with suspected primary Sjögren syndrome (pSS), and construct a nomogram model to predict LSGB results. A total of 181 patients who were admitted with suspected pSS from December 2018 to April 2023 were examined and divided into a training set (n = 120) and a validation set (n = 61). Baseline data of the two groups were examined, and the value of SGUS, MRI, and MRS in predicting LSGB was analyzed. Multivariate logistic analysis was used to screen for risk factors, and nomogram prediction models were constructed using these results. In the training set, the SGUS, MRI, and MRS scores of patients in the LSGB + group were higher than those in the LSGB − group (all P < 0.001). The positive prediction value (PPV) was 91% for an SGUS score of 3, and 82% for MRI and MRS scores of 2 or more. We developed a nomogram prediction model based on SGUS, MRI, and MRS data, and it had a concordance index (C-index) of 0.94. The Hosmer–Lemeshow test (χ2 = 3.17, P = 0.92) also indicated the nomogram prediction model had good accuracy and calibration for prediction of LSGB results. A nomogram model based on SGUS, MRI, and MRS results can help rheumatologists decide whether LSGB should be performed in patients with suspected pSS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

As the data relating to patient privacy in this study is currently held by this organisation; the research team can request it from them if required.

References

  1. Mariette X, Criswell LA (2018) Primary Sjögren’s Syndrome. N Engl J Med 379:97. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1804598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhan Q, Zhang J, Lin Y, Chen W et al (2023) Pathogenesis and treatment of Sjogren’s syndrome: Review and update. Front Immunol 14:1127417. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1127417

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Patel R, Shahane A (2014) The epidemiology of Sjögren’s syndrome. Clin Epidemiol 6:247–255. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S47399

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Qin B, Wang J, Yang Z et al (2015) Epidemiology of primary Sjögren’s syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis 74:1983–1989. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Alani H, Henty JR, Thompson NL et al (2018) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the epidemiology of polyautoimmunity in Sjögren’s syndrome (secondary Sjögren’s syndrome) focusing on autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Scand J Rheumato 47:141–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/03009742.2017.1324909

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Vivino FB, Bunya VY, Massaro G et al (2019) Sjogren’s syndrome: An update on disease pathogenesis, clinical manifestations and treatment. Clin Immunol 203:81–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clim.2019.04.009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Theander E, Jacobsson LT (2008) Relationship of Sjögren’s syndrome to other connective tissue and autoimmune disorders. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 34(4):935–947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdc.2008.08.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vitali C, Bombardieri S, Jonsson R, European Study Group on Classification Criteria for Sjögren’s Syndrome et al (2002) Classification criteria for Sjögren’s syndrome: a revised version of the European criteria proposed by the American-European Consensus Group. Ann Rheum Dis 61(6):554–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.61.6.554

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Shiboski CH, Shiboski SC, Seror RM, International Sjögren’s Syndrome Criteria Working Group et al (2017) 2016 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for primary Sjögren’s syndrome: A consensus and data-driven methodology involving three international patient cohorts. Ann Rheum Dis 76(1):9–16. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang X, Zhang S, Feng R et al (2021) Sonoelastography of salivary glands for diagnosis and clinical evaluation in primary Sjögren’s syndrome. Clin Exp Rheumatol 133(6):184–189. https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/6nu95q

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kroese M, Haacke A, Bombardieri M (2018) The role of salivary gland histopathology in primary Sjögren’s syndrome: promises and pitfalls. Clin Exp Rheumatol 112(3):222–233

    Google Scholar 

  12. Robin F, Albert JD, Lescoat A et al (2022) Diagnostic Performances of Ultrasound Evaluation of Major Salivary Glands According to the 2019 Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Ultrasound Scoring System. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 74(11):1924–1932. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.24631

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Izumi M, Eguchi K, Ohki M et al (1996) MR imaging of the parotid gland in Sjögren’s syndrome: a proposal for new diagnostic criteria. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166(6):1483–1487. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.166.6.8633469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shimdad Y, Kojima I, Iikubo M (2021) Comparative Study of Multiple High-Signal-Intensity Spots on 3D and 2D Magnetic Resonance Sialography for Patients with Sjögren’s Syndrome. Radiol Res Pract 2021:5846637. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5846637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lorenzon M, Spina E, Tulipano F et al (2022) Salivary Gland Ultrasound in Primary Sjögren’s Syndrome: Current and Future Perspectives. Open Access Rheumatol 14:147–160. https://doi.org/10.2147/OARRR.S284763

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Jousse-Joulin S, Gatineau F, Baldini C et al (2020) Weight of salivary gland ultrasonography compared to other items of the 2016 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for Primary Sjögren’s syndrome. J Intern Med 287(2):180–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12992

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fana V, Dohn M, Krabbe S et al (2021) Application of the OMERACT Grey-scale Ultrasound Scoring System for salivary glands in a single-centre cohort of patients with suspected Sjögren's syndrome. RMD Open 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001516.

  18. Mossel E, Delli K, van Nimwegen JF, EULAR US-pSS Study Group et al (2017) Ultrasonography of major salivary glands compared with parotid and labial gland biopsy and classification criteria in patients with clinically suspected primary Sjögren’s syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 76(11):1883–1889. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mo Q, Hao Y, Li H et al (2021) Ultrasonography predicts the results of labial salivary gland biopsy in patients with suspected Sjögren’s syndrome a matrix risk model. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 13:1759720X211010592. https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X211010592

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Jousse-Joulin S, D’Agostino MA, Nicolas C et al (2019) Video clip assessment of a salivary gland ultrasound scoring system in Sjögren’s syndrome using consensual definitions: an OMERACT ultrasound working group reliability exercise. Ann Rheum Dis 78(7):967–973. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Seror R, Ravaud P, Mariette XEULAR, Force ST et al (2011) EULAR Sjogren’s Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI): development of a consensus patient index for primary Sjogren’s syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 70(6):968–972. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2010.143743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Whitcher JP, Shiboski CH, Shiboski SC, Sjögren’s International Collaborative Clinical Alliance Research Groups et al (2010) A simplified quantitative method for assessing keratoconjunctivitis sicca from the Sjögren’s Syndrome International Registry. Am J Ophthalmol 149(3):405–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2009.09.01323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rao Y, Xu N, Zhang Y et al (2023) Value of magnetic resonance imaging and sialography of the parotid gland for diagnosis of primary Sjögren syndrome. Int J Rheum Dis 26(3):454–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185X.14528

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chisholm DM, Mason DK (1968) Labial salivary gland biopsy in Sjögren’s disease. J Clin Pathol 21(5):656–660. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.21.5.65625

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Daniels TE, Cox D, Shiboski CH, Sjögren’s International Collaborative Clinical Alliance Research Groups et al (2011) Associations between salivary gland histopathologic diagnoses and phenotypic features of Sjögren’s syndrome among 1,726 registry participants. Arthritis Rheum 63(7):2021–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.30381

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Ren YD, Li XR, Zhang J et al (2015) Conventional MRI techniques combined with MR sialography on T2–3D-DRIVE in Sjögren syndrome. Int J Clin Exp Med 8(3):3974–3982

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Theander E, Mandl T (2014) Primary Sjögren’s syndrome: diagnostic and prognostic value of salivary gland ultrasonography using a simplified scoring system. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 66(7):1102–1107. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.2226428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. De Vita S, Lorenzon G, Rossi G et al (1992) Salivary gland echography in primary and secondary Sjögren’s syndrome. Clin Exp Rheumatol 10(4):351–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Carotti M, Salaffi F, Di Carlo M et al (2019) Diagnostic value of major salivary gland ultrasonography in primary Sjögren’s syndrome: the role of grey-scale and colour/power Doppler sonography. Gland Surg 8:S159–S167. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2019.05.0330

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Tang G, Luo Y, Mo Y et al (2023) Diagnostic value of ultrasound evaluation of major salivary glands for Sjögren’s syndrome based on the novel OMERACT scoring system. Eur J Radiol 162:110765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110765

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Świecka M, Maślińska M, Paluch Ł et al (2019) Imaging methods in primary Sjögren’s syndrome as potential tools of disease diagnostics and monitoring. Reumatologia 57(6):336–342. https://doi.org/10.5114/reum.2019.91273

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. El M, Ahmed I, Mourad G et al (2004) Quantitative ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging of the parotid gland: can they replace the histopathologic studies in patients with Sjogren’s syndrome? Joint Bone Spine 71(1):29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2003.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. André R, Becker M, Lombardi T et al (2021) Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Salivary Glands With Magnetic Resonance Sialography in Sjögren’s Syndrome. Laryngoscope 131(1):E83–E89. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28742

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Professor Wei Wang and Dr. Lian Cheng from the Imaging Department of Yangzhou University Affiliated Hospital for providing technical guidance and support for the successful completion of this study. We thank Medjaden Inc. for assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82071821), Jiangsu Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. BK20201222), The Fifth Phase of "333 Project" Scientific Research Project of Jiangsu Province in 2020 (No. BRA2020175), Yangzhou University "High-end Talent Plan" Top Talent Growth Plan (2019), and special fund for medical innovation and transformation of Yangzhou University (AHYZUCXTD 202105).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Guoqing Li and Nan Xu designed the study. Xuanhan Wang, Nan Xu, Tiantian Dai, Yimin Ding, Yongbin Zhang, Yuxuan Fang collated the data, carried out data analyses and produced the initial draft of the manuscript. Nan Xu, Tiantian Dai, Nianxing Liu, Longlong Tian and Jinqiong Chen contributed to drafting the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final submitted manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guoqing Li.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, N., Wang, X., Dai, T. et al. Non-invasive imaging for predicting labial salivary gland biopsy outcomes in patients with suspected primary Sjögren syndrome. Clin Rheumatol 43, 1683–1692 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-024-06949-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-024-06949-w

Keywords

Navigation