Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The effect of wind pressure on surface erosion of soft rocks in arid regions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The wind acts as a land-shaping agent in desert and coastal regions, with more significant effects on soft, porous rocks than on massive rock formations. Air-suspended particles degrade rock surfaces, form cavities, and produce drift channels; however, abrasions that have been formed without the impacts of suspended particles are occasionally observed on very soft rock surfaces in areas exposed directly to the wind. The effect of wind without abrasive particles on soft and porous rock samples was examined using a newly designed wind tunnel. Samples were exposed to various wind speeds of 6–9 m/s to determine the most efficient wind speed. Ignimbrite, mudstone and sandstone specimens, all of which possess high porosity and low strength, were tested in the wind tunnel under a constant air temperature for 1 year. During that time, changes in sample weight were measured at weekly intervals. The specimens started to decrease in weight after losing surface moisture, with the highest weight loss observed in the samples with high porosity and low strength. Air pressure from the wind caused tension on rock surfaces. Surface strain measurements were carried out to determine the effects of wind pressure on weight loss. The maximum strain (250 μ) was recorded on mudstone samples with high porosity and low strength. A good relationship was detected between surficial strain and weight loss. The air pressures on the sample surfaces caused by the wind forces were measured with a new sensor. The air pressure values measured on the surface oscillated between −56 and 133 Pa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alfaro SC, Gomes L (2001) Modelling mineral aerosol production by wind erosion: emission intensities and aerosol size distributions in source areas. J Geophys Res Atmos 106(D16):18075–18084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anon 2017 http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/wind-load-d_1775.html

  • Azizov A (1977) Influence of soil moisture in the resistance of soil to wind erosion. Sov Soil Sci 1:105–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagnold RA (1941) The physics of blown sand and desert dunes. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer BO, Houser CA, Nickling WG (2004) Analysis of velocity profile measurements from wind-tunnel experiments with salvation. Geomorphology 59:81–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binal A (2009) A new laboratory rock test based on freeze–thaw using a steel chamber. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 42(2):179–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binal A, Ercanoğlu M (2010) Assessment of rockfall potential in the Kula (Manisa, Turkey) Geopark region. Environ Earth Sci 61(7):1361–1373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binal A (2010) The investigation of wind effects on porous and weak rocks with using air tunnel. In: Panait C, Barsan E, Bulucea A, Mastorakis N, Long C (eds) The 3rd international conference on environmental and geological science and engineering (EG’10). The World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS), Constanta, pp 214–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisal F, Hsieh J (1966) Influence of moisture on erodibility of soil by wind. Soil Sci 102:143–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield GR (1999) Near-bed mass flux profiles in aeolian sand transport, high-resolution measurements in a wind tunnel. Earth Surf Process Landf 24:393–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chepil WS (1956) Influence of moisture on erodibility of soil by wind. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 20:288–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chepil WS, Woodruff NP (1963) The physics of wind erosion and its control. Adv Agron 15:211–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado-Fernandez I, Davidson-Arnott R (2011) Meso-scale aeolian sediment input to coastal dunes: the nature of aeolian transport events. Geomorphology 126(1–2):217–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong Z, Wang H, Liu X, Li F, Zhao A (2002) Velocity profile of a sand cloud blowing over a gravel surface. Geomorphology 45:277–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dundar C, Canbaz M, Akgun N, Ural G (2002) Turkish wind atlas. Turkish State Meteorological Service Publication No:2002/04 Ankara

  • Ercan T, Türkecan T, Dinçel A, Günay E (1983) Geology of Kula-Selendi (Manisa) area. Jeoloji Mühendisligi Dergisi 17:3–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillette DA (1977) Fine-particle emissions due to wind erosion. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 20:890–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillies JA, Nickling WG, Tilson M (2009) Ventifacts and wind eroded rock features in the Taylor Valley, Antarctica. Geomorphology 107(3):149–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goossens D, Offer Z, London G (2000) Wind tunnel and field calibration of five aeolian sand traps. Geomorphology 35:233–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goudie AS (1983) Dust storms in space and time. Prog Phys Geogr 7(4):502–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISRM (2015) The ISRM suggested method for rock characterization, testing and monitoring: 2007–2014, [Edt]. In: Ulusay R (ed) Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07713-0

  • Karakus M, Kumral M, Kılıç O (2005) Predicting elastic properties of intact rocks from index tests using multiple regression modelling. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 42:323–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang LQ, Guo LJ, ZM G, Liu DY (2008) Wind tunnel experimental investigation of sand velocity in aeolian sand transport. Geomorphology 97:438–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasmer O, Ulusay R, Genis M (2013) Assessments on the stability of natural slopes prone to toe erosion, and man-made historical semi-underground openings carved in soft tuffs at Zelve open-air museum (Cappadocia, Turkey). Eng Geol 158:135–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjelgaard J, Chandler D, Saxton K (2002) Evidence for direct suspension of loessial soils. In: Lee JA, Zobeck TM (eds) Proceeding of the ICAR5/GCTE-SEN Joint Meeting. Lubbock, Texas 38

  • Laity JE, Bridges NT (2009) Ventifacts on earth and Mars: analytical, field, and laboratory studies supporting sand abrasion and windward feature development. Geomorphology 105:202–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Dong Z (2004) Experimental investigation of the concentration profile of a blowing sand cloud. Geomorphology 60:371–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyles L, Tatarko J (1986) Wind erosion effects on soil texture and organic matter. J Soil Water Conserv 41(3):191–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozaner FS (2006) Kula çevresindeki volkanik şekillerin jeopark/jeoturizm potansiyeli. In: Geçmisten Geleceğe Köprü, Yanık Ülke Kula Sempozyumu, Turkey, pp 83–103 (Turkish)

  • Peterson AT, Soberon J, Pearson RG, Anderson RP, Martinez-Meyer E, Nakamura M, Araujo MB (2011) Ecological Niches and geographic distributions. Princeton University Press, USA. 281pp

  • Rasmussen KR, Valance A, Merrison J (2015) Laboratory studies of aeolian sediment transport processes on planetary surfaces. Geomorphology 244:74–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen E, Kürkcüoglu B, Aydar E, Gourgaud A, Vincent PM (2003) Volcanological evolution of mount Erciyes stratovolcano and origin of the Valibaba Tepe ignimbrite (central Anatolia, Turkey). J Volcanol Geotherm Res 125(3):225–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao YP (2000) Physics and modelling of wind erosion. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao YP, Raupach MR, Leys JF (1996) A model for predicting aeolian sand drift and dust entrainment on scales from paddock to region. Austr J Soil Res 34:309–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TE Connectivity MS5803-14BA (2017) http://www.te.com/usa-en/product-CAT-BLPS0013.html. Accessed 27 July 2017

  • Tegen I, Fung I (1995) Contribution to the atmospheric mineral aerosol load from land surface modification. J Geophys Res 100:18707–18726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topal T, Doyuran V (1997) Analysis of deterioration of the Cappadocian tuff. Environ Geol 34(1):5–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney MI (1979) Electron micrography of mineral surfaces subject to wind-blast erosion. Geol Soc Am Bull 90:917–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney MI, Dietrich RV (1973) Ventifact sculpture by windblown dust. Geol Soc Am Bull 84:2561–2582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zobeck TM, Popham TW, Skidmore EL, Lamb JA, Merrill SD, Lindstrom MJ, Mokma DL, Yoder RE (2003) An analysis of soil dry aggregate-size distributions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 67(2):425–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Turkish National Scientific Committee (Project No: 104Y195).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Engineering, Department of Geological Engineering, Hacettepe University, Beytepe Campus, 06800, Ankara, Turkey

    Adil Binal

Authors
  1. Adil Binal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adil Binal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Binal, A. The effect of wind pressure on surface erosion of soft rocks in arid regions. Bull Eng Geol Environ 78, 1565–1574 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1218-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1218-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation