Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of Exclusive Binocular Rivalry on Perceived Depth in the ‘Sieve Effect’

  • VISION
  • Published:
Optical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An impression of a surface seen through holes is created when one fuses dichoptic pairs of discs with one member of each pair black and the other white. This is referred to as the ‘sieve effect’. This stimulus contains no positional disparities. The impression of depth in the sieve effect is most evident when the size, contrast, and rim thickness of rivalrous patterns are such as to produce exclusive rivalry. I investigated how long it took for the sieve effect to recover from exclusive rivalry suppression. The magnitude of perceived depth in the effect was measured after exclusive rivalry suppression of one half-image of the sieve-effect stimulus. The results showed that the sieve effect takes approximately 630 ms to recover from exclusive rivalry suppression, compared with 200 ms for disparity-based stereopsis. Considered together with the previous report [Matsumiya and Howard: Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 42 (2001) S403] that the sieve effect is positively correlated with the rate of exclusive rivalry, these findings suggest that the effect and exclusive rivalry are processed in the identical channel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. Julesz and C. W. Tyler: Biol. Cybernetics 23 (1976) 25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J. M. Wolfe: Psychol. Rev. 93 (1986) 269.

    Google Scholar 

  3. I. P. Howard: in Seeing in Depth, ed. I. P. Howard (I Pourteous, Toronto, 2002) Vol. 1, p. 304.

  4. A. Treisman: Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 14 (1962) 23.

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. Kaufman: Am. J. Psychol. 77 (1964) 193.

    Google Scholar 

  6. K. N. Ogle and J. M. Wakefield: Vision Res. 7 (1967) 89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. V. S. Ramachandran and S. Sriram: Nature 237 (1972) 347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. B. Julesz and J. E. Miller: Perception 4 (1975) 125.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Shimojo and K. Nakayama: Vision Res. 30 (1990) 69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Hayashi, T. Maeda, S. Shimojo and S. Tachi: Vision Res. 44 (2004) 2367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. R. A. Harrad, S. P. McKee, R. Blake and Y. Yang: Perception 23 (1994) 15.

    Google Scholar 

  12. I. P. Howard: Perception 24 (1995) 67.

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. von. Helmholtz: in Physiological Optics, ed. J. P. C. Southhall (Dover, New York, 1962) English translation from Handbuch der Physiologischen Optik (Voss, Hamburg, 1909) 3rd ed.

  14. R. P. O'Shea and R. Blake: Percept. Psychophys. 42 (1987) 205.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Blake, R. P. O'Shea and T. J. Mueller: Visual Neurosci. 8 (1992) 469.

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. Matsumiya and I. P. Howard: Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 42 (2001) S403.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. J. Tsai and J. D. Victor: Vision Res. 40 (2000) 2265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazumichi Matsumiya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matsumiya, K. Influence of Exclusive Binocular Rivalry on Perceived Depth in the ‘Sieve Effect’. OPT REV 13, 39–45 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10043-006-0039-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10043-006-0039-0

Key words

Navigation