Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of systemic inflammatory response after total extraperitoneal repair and Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the study was assessment of the systemic inflammatory response (SIR) intensity by measuring the blood serum levels of high sensitivity C—reactive protein (hsCRP), Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and Total Leukocyte Counts of patients. The estimations were done before and after the patient underwent either open Lichtenstein or endoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair. This is a prospective observational type of study.

Methods

Sixty patients with a diagnosis of unilateral uncomplicated inguinal hernia were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups. In the first group, endoscopic total extraperitoneal repair (TEP) was done, while the other group underwent Lichtenstein repair. The patient selection was random. Serum markers for SIR were measured prior to and 24 h post-surgery.

Results

Total extraperitoneal repair (TEP) and open Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair both cause a significant Systemic Inflammatory Response in the body. The rise in serum markers for SIR post-surgery was statistically significant in both the groups. The rise in serum hsCRP and IL-6 concentrations was observed to be equivocal among the two groups. Statistically significant difference was observed in serum TLC rise: Lichtenstein repair group having a higher value.

Conclusion

Both, open and endoscopic surgical techniques incite a systemic inflammatory response in the body. However, it cannot be conclusively stated that TEP is associated with lesser SIR compared to the Lichtenstein repair on the basis of this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rutkow IM, Robbins AW (1993) Demographic, classifactory and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States. Surg Clin N Am 73:413–426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Libiszewski M, Drozda R, Bialechi I et al (2011) Assessment of inflammatory response intensity in early post op period in patients after hernioplasty operated on with classic Stoppa method and videoscopic TEP method. Po Prz Chir 83:497–501

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fegade S (2008) Laparoscopic versus open repair of inguinal hernia. World J lap surg 1:41–48

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zinner MJ, Ashley SW (2007) Maingot’s Abdominal Operations, 11th edn. McGraw Hill Medical, USA

    Google Scholar 

  5. McKernan JB, Laws HL (1993) Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia using TEP approach. Surg Endosc 7:26–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kingsnorth A, LeBlanc K (2003) Hernias: inguinal and incisional. Lancet 362:1561–1571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Urbaniak GC, Plous S (1997–2016) Research Randomizer. Available from: https://www.randomizer.org/. Accessed 20 Sep 2012

  8. Amid K (1997) Classification of biomaterials and their related complications in abdominal wall hernia surgery. Hernia 1:15–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. European Hernia Society (2007) EHS Classification for Inguinal Hernia. Available from: https://www.europeanherniasociety.eu/fileadmin/downloads/library/EHS_Classification_sheet.pdf. Accessed 20 Sep 2012

  10. Wassung K (2012) The Role of Inflammation and the healing process. Available from: http://cichirowc.com/uploads/2012-01-30_Inflammation_and_the_healing_process.pdf. Accessed 2 Oct 2012

  11. Sheeran P, Hall GM (1997) Cytokines in anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 78:201–219

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Desborough JP (2000) The stress response to trauma and surgery. Br J Anaesth 85(1):109–117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kehlet H (1997) Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 78:606–617

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, Bouillot JL, Campanelli G, Conze J, de Lange D, Fortelny R, Heikkinen T, Kingsnorth A, Kukleta J, Morales-Conde S et al (2009) European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia 13:343–403

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Klinge U, Park JK, Klosterhalfen B (2013) The Ideal Mesh? Pathobiology 80:169–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brown CN, Finch JG (2010) Which mesh for hernia repair? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 92:272–278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Bilsel Y, Abci I (2012) The search for ideal hernia repair; mesh materials and types. Int J Surg 10(6):317–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bulbuller N, Kirkil C, Godekmerdan A, Aygen E, Ilhan YS (2015) The comparison of inflammatory responses and clinical results after groin hernia repair using polypropylene or polyester meshes. J Surg 77(Suppl 2):283–287

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Di Vita G, Milano S, Frazzetta M, Patti R, Palazzolo V, Barbera C, Ferlazzo V, Leo P, Cillari E (2000) Tension-free hernia repair is associated with an increase in inflammatory response markers against the mesh. Am J Surg 180(3):203–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bender O, Balci FL, Yüney E, Sağlam F, Ozdenkaya Y, Sari YS (2009) Systemic inflammatory response after Kugel versus laparoscopic groin hernia repair: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 23(12):2657–2661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schwab R, Eissele S, Brückner UB, Gebhard F, Becker HP (2004) Systemic inflammatory response after endoscopic (TEP) vs Shouldice groin hernia repair. Hernia 8(3):226–232

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, Ross S, Grant AM. Laparoscopic technique versus open technique for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003; CD001785

  23. Lal P, Kajla RK, Chander J, Saha R, Ramteke VK (2003) Randomized controlled study of laparoscopic total extraperitoneal versus open Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 17(6):850–856

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Myers E, Browne KM, Kavanagh DO, Hurley M (2010) Laparoscopic (TEP) Versus Lichtenstein Inguinal Hernia Repair: a Comparison of Quality-of-Life Outcomes. World J Surg 34(12):3059–3064

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Staarink M, van Veen RN, Hop WC, Weidema WF (2008) A 10-year follow-up study on endoscopic total extraperitoneal repair of primary and recurrent inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc 22:1803–1806

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kavic SM (2013) Laparoscopic versus open repair: a superior approach to inguinal herniorrhaphy? OA Minimally Invasive Surgery 1(1):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Feliu X, Claveria R, Besora P, Camps J, Fernández-Sallent E, Viñas X et al (2011) Bilateral inguinal hernia repair: laparoscopic or open approach? Hernia 15(1):15–18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tanphiphat C, Tanprayoon T, Sangsubhan C, Chatamra K (1998) Laparoscopic vs open inguinal hernia repair. A randomized, controlled trial. Surg Endosc 12(6):846–851

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang C, Zhang H, Pu J, Mei H, Zheng L, Tong Q (2011) Laparoscopic vs open herniorrhaphy in the management of pediatric inguinal hernia: a systemic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg 46(9):1824–1834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Koning GG, Wetterslev J, van Laarhoven CJHM, Keus F (2013) The totally extraperitoneal method versus Lichtenstein’s technique for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses of randomized Clinical Trials. PLoS One 8(1):e52599

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Vats.

Ethics declarations

Declaration

The authors declare that the study experiments comply with the current laws in India.

Funding

None.

Conflict of interest

MV, DP, SS, NT, GS, MA, and AK have declared no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and it’s later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all Individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vats, M., Pandey, D., Saha, S. et al. Assessment of systemic inflammatory response after total extraperitoneal repair and Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia. Hernia 21, 65–71 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-016-1543-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-016-1543-1

Keywords

Navigation