Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Randomized clinical trial of mesh fixation with “double crown” versus “sutures and tackers” in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although laparoscopic intra-peritoneal mesh repair (LVHR) is a well-established treatment option to repair ventral and incisional hernias, no consensus in the literature can be found on the best method of fixation of the mesh to the abdominal wall.

Methods

Between December 2004 and July 2008, 76 patients undergoing a LVHR were randomized between mesh fixation using a double row of spiral tackers (DC) (n = 33) and mesh fixation with transfascial sutures combined with one row of spiral tackers (S&T) (n = 43), in the WoW trial (with or without sutures). Patients were clinically examined and evaluated using a visual analog scale for pain (VAS) in rest and after coughing 4 h post-operatively, after 4 weeks and 3 months after surgery. Primary endpoint of the study was abdominal wall pain, defined as a VAS score of at least 1.0 cm, at 3 months post-operative. Quality of life was quantified with the SF-36 questionnaire preoperatively and after 3 months. Secondary endpoint was the recurrence rate at 24-month follow-up.

Results

The DC and S&T group were comparable in age, gender, ASA score, BMI, indication, hernia, and mesh variables. The DC group had a significant shorter operating time compared with the S&T group (74 vs 96 min; p = 0.014) and a significant lower mean VAS score 4 h post-operatively (in rest; p = 0.028/coughing; p = 0.013). At 3 months, there were significant more patients in the S&T group with VAS score ≥1.0 cm (31.4 vs 8.3 %; p = 0.036). Clinical follow-up at 24 months was obtained in 63 patients (82.9 %). The recurrence rate at 24 months was 7.9 % overall (5/63). There were more recurrences in the S&T group (4/36) than in the DC group (1/27), but this difference was not significant (11.1 vs 3.7 %; p = 0.381).

Conclusion

We found that double-crown fixation of intra-peritoneal mesh during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair was quicker, was less painful immediately post-operative and after 3 months, and did not increase the recurrence rate at 24 months. In hernias at a distance from the bony borders of the abdomen, transfascial sutures can be omitted if a double crown of tackers is placed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Interface = the area in which two things can come together and have an effect on each other (Cambridge international dictionary of English).

References

  1. LeBlanc KA, Booth WV (1993) Laparoscopic repair of incisional abdominal hernias using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene: preliminary findings. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3:39–41

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Heniford BT, Park A, Ramshaw BJ, Voeller G (2003) Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias: nine years’ experience with 850 consecutive hernias. Ann Surg 238:391–400

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. LeBlanc KA, Whitaker JM, Bellanger DE, Rhynes VK (2003) Laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernioplasty: lessons learned from 200 patients. Hernia 7:118–124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Carbajo MA, Martin Del Olmo JC, Blanco JI, Toledano M, de la Cuesta C, Ferreras C, Vaquero C (2003) Laparoscopic approach to incisional hernia. Lessons learned from 270 patients over 8 years. Surg Endosc 17:118–122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Morales-Conde S, Cadet H, Cano A, Bustos M, Martin J, Morales-Mendez S (2005) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair without sutures—double crown technique: our experience after 140 cases with a mean follow-up of 40 months. Int Surg 90:S56–S62

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wassenaar EB, Schoenmaeckers EJP, Raymakers JTFJ, Rakic S (2009) Recurrences after laparoscopic repair of ventral and incisional hernia: lessons learned from 505 patients. Surg Endosc 23:825–832

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Berger D, Bientzle M (2008) Polyvinylidene fluoride: a suitable mesh material for laparoscopic incisional and parastomal hernia repair. Hernia 12:243–246

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chelala E, Debardemaeker Y, Elias B, Charara F, Dessily M, Allé JL (2010) Eighty-five redo surgeries after 733 laparoscopic treatments for ventral and incisional hernia: adhesion and recurrence analysis. Hernia 14:123–129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Forbes SS, Eskicioglu C, McLeod RS, Okrainec A (2009) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing open and laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with mesh. Br J Surg 96:851–858

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sauerland S, Walgenbach M, Habermalz B, Seiler CM, Miserez M (2011) Laparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repair. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD007781. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007781.pub2

  11. Baccari P, Nifosi J, Ghirardelli L, Staudacher C (2009) Laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair without sutures: a single-center experience with 200 cases. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19:175–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ceccarelli G, Patriti A, Batoli A, Bellochi R, Spaziani A, Pisanelli MC, Casciola L (2008) Laparoscopic incisional hernia mesh repair with the “double-crown” technique: a case–control study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 18:377–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Carbonell AM, Harold KL, Mahmutovic AJ, Hassan R, Mathews BD, Kercher KW, Sing RF, Heniford BT (2003) Local injection for the treatment of suture site pain after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Am Surg 69:688–691

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Muysoms F, Daeter E, Vander Mijnsbrugge G, Claeys D (2004) Laparoscopic intraperitoneal repair of incisional and ventral hernias. Acta Chir Belg 104:705–708

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bellows CF, Berger DH (2006) Infiltration of suture sites with local anaesthesia for management of pain following laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs: a prospective randomised trial. JSLS 10:345–350

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wassenaar EB, Raymakers JT, Rakic S (2007) Removal of transabdominal sutures for chronic pain after laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17:514–516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Muysoms FE, Cathenis KKJ, Claeys DAB (2007) “Suture hernia”: identification of a new type of hernia presenting as a recurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Hernia 11:199–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Khandelwal RG, Bibyan M, Reddy PK (2010) Transfascial suture hernia: a rare form of recurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20:753–755

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Barzana D, Johnson K, Clancy TV, Hope WW (2010) Hernia recurrence through a composite mesh secondary to transfacial suture holes. Hernia. doi:10.1007/s10029-010-0728-2 (Epub ahead of print)

  20. LeBlanc KA (2007) Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: are transfascial sutures necessary? A review of the literature. Surg Endosc 21:508–513

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Brill JB, Turner PL (2011) Long-term outcomes with transfascial sutures versus tacks in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a review. Am Surg 77:458–465

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wassenaar E, Schoenmaeckers E, Raymakers J, van der Palen J, Rakic S (2010) Mesh-fixation method and pain and quality of life after laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair: a randomized trial of three fixation techniques. Surg Endosc 24:1296–1302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Beldi G, Wagner M, Bruegger LE, Kurmann A, Candinas D (2011) Mesh shrinkage and pain in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial comparing suture versus tack mesh fixation. Surg Endosc 25:749–755

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bansal VK, Misra MC, Kumar S, Rao YK, Singhal P, Goswami A, Guleria S, Arora MK, Chabra A (2011) A prospective randomized study comparing suture mesh fixation versus tacker mesh fixation for laparoscopic repair of incisional and ventral hernias. Surg Endosc 25:1431–1438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Eriksen JR, Bisgaard T, Assaadzadeh S, Jorgensen LN, Rosenberg J (2011) Randomized clinical trial of fibrin sealant versus titanium tacks for mesh fixation in laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair. Br J Surg 98:1537–1545

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Muysoms FE, Miserez M, Berrevoet F, Campanelli G, Champault GG, Chelala E, Dietz UA, Eker HH, El Nakadi I, Hauters P, Hidalgo M, Hoeferlin A, Klinge U, Montgomery A, Simmermacher RKJ, Simons MP, Śmietański M, Sommeling C, Tollens T, Vierendeels T, Kingsnorth A (2009) Classification of primary and incisional ventral hernias. Hernia 13:407–414

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wassenaar EB, Raymakers JT, Rakic S (2008) Impact of the mesh fixation technique on operation time in laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias. Hernia 12:23–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Greenstein AJ, Nguyen SQ, Buch KE, Chin EH, Weber KJ, Divino CM (2008) Recurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a prospective pilot study of suture versus tack fixation. Am Surg 74:227–231

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Loos MJA, Houterman S, Scheltinga MRM, Roumen RMH (2008) Evaluating postherniorrhaphy groin pain: Visual Analogue or Verbal Rating Scale? Hernia 12:147–151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Heniford BT, Walters AL, Lincourt AE, Novitsky YW, Hope WW, Kercher KW (2008) Comparison of generic versus specific quality-of-life scales for mesh hernia repairs. J Am Coll Surg 206:638–644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Carter PR, LeBlanc KA, Hausmann MG, Whitaker JM, Rhynes VK, Kleinpeter KP, Allain BW (2011) Does expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh really shrink after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair? doi:10.1007/s10029-011-0898-6

  32. Schoenmaeckers EJ, van der Valk SB, van den Hout HW, Raymakers JF, Rakic S (2009) Computed tomographic measurements of mesh shrinkage after laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh. Surg Endosc 23:1620–1623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Eriksen JR, Poornoroozy P, Jorgensen LN, Jacobsen B, Friis-Andersen HU, Rosenberg J (2009) Pain, quality of life and recovery after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Hernia 13:13–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was performed with a research grant from WL Gore & Ass, Flagstaff, USA. The company was not involved in the design, the conduct, or the analysis of the trial. This grant was used only for the statistical analysis, which was performed by statisticians independent from the participating centers. Ronald Buyl, PhD, MSc, Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium performed the statistical analysis.

Conflict of interest

FM declares having received funding from WL Gore & Ass to pay for the statistical analysis of this study. And the co-authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Muysoms.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muysoms, F., Vander Mijnsbrugge, G., Pletinckx, P. et al. Randomized clinical trial of mesh fixation with “double crown” versus “sutures and tackers” in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Hernia 17, 603–612 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1084-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1084-9

Keywords

Navigation