Skip to main content
Log in

Trans-fascial laparoscopic mesh fixation: a procedural comparison using the standard suture passer versus iMESH stitcher™ device

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Laparoscopic mesh repair has become an increasingly common method for repairing incisional hernias. The current method for fixating mesh to the abdominal wall includes tacking the mesh to the peritoneum and fascia and suturing the mesh to the fascia with trans-fascial sutures. The iMESH Stitcher™ is a stitching device developed to both simplify and expedite this procedure by passing the suture from one arm of the iMESH stitcher™ to the other. The device enables a stitch to be created in three quick moves using only one hand. We compared both the efficacy and procedure time of trans-fascial mesh fixation when performed with the iMESH stitcher™ as compared to the standard suture passer method.

Methods

A mesh patch was installed on the internal abdominal wall of two pigs. Surgical residents and Medical students were participants in the study and were trained in both techniques. Each participant was asked to perform six fixations with each technique. The procedural time required for both fixation techniques was recorded. Participants were asked to assess subjectively the relative difficulty of each technique on a scale of 1–10 (10 = most difficult).

Results

Sixteen residents and students performed a total of 12 mesh fixations, each performing 6 fixations with each technique. Average mesh fixation suture time using the suture passer technique was 44 s for residents and 47 s for students. Average fixation suture time using the iMESH stitcherTM was 17 s for residents and 15 s for students. The average difficulty score for the suture passer technique was 6.1 as compared to 2.9 with iMESH stitcher™.

Conclusion

Trans-fascial fixation with the iMESH Stitcher™ took significantly less time than the standard suture passer method. The iMESH Stitcher™ significantly simplifies the procedure of transfascial fixation and potentially reduces technical difficulties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2a–d
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hawn MT, Snyder CW, Graham LA, Gray SH, Finan KR, Vick CC (2010) Long-term follow-up of technical outcomes for incisional hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg 210:648–657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McGreevy JM, Goodney PP, Birkmeyer CM, Finlayson SR, Laycock WS, Birkmeyer JD (2003) A prospective study comparing the complication rates between laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs. Surg Endosc 17:1778–1780

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Itani KM, Hur K, Kim LT, Anthony T, Berger DH, Reda D, Neumayer L (2010) Comparison of laparoscopic and open repair with mesh for the treatment of ventral incisional hernia: a randomized trial. Arch Surg 145:322–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kingsnorth A, Banerjea A, Bhargava A (2009) Incisional hernia repair—laparoscopic or open surgery? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 91:631–636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2009) Single port laparoscopic repair of primary and incisional ventral hernia. Hernia 13:569–570

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Horgan S, Cullen JP, Talamini MA, Mintz Y, Ferreres A, Jacobsen GR, Sandler B, Bosia J, Savides T, Easter DW, Savu MK, Ramamoorthy SL, Whitcomb E, Agarwal S, Lukacz E, Dominguez G, Ferraina P (2009) Natural orifice surgery: initial clinical experience. Surg Endosc 23:1512–1518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bencini L, Sánchez LJ (2004) Learning curve for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Am J Surg 187:378–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Santos BF, Enter D, Soper NJ, Hungness ES (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) versus standard laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of performance using a surgical simulator. Surg Endosc [E-pub ahead of print] doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1197-5

Download references

Conflict of interest

R.E., M.A.-G., A.S., A.K., N.S. and A.I.R. have no financial interests regarding the iMESH stitcher™ device or anything else to disclose. Y.M. is a medical consultant for EasyLap Ltd., the manufacturer of the iMESH stitcher™ device.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Elazary.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elazary, R., Abu-Gazala, M., Schlager, A. et al. Trans-fascial laparoscopic mesh fixation: a procedural comparison using the standard suture passer versus iMESH stitcher™ device. Hernia 15, 321–324 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-011-0789-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-011-0789-x

Keywords

Navigation