Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Lightweight mesh improves functional outcome in laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal inguinal hernia repair

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Prosthetic mesh reinforcement is standard practice for inguinal hernia repair but can cause considerable pain and stiffness around the groin and affect physical functioning. This has led to various types of mesh being engineered, with a growing interest in a lighter weight mesh. The aim of this prospective study was to compare the outcome after laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal (TEP) inguinal repair using new lightweight or traditional heavyweight mesh performed in a single specialist centre.

Methods

Between November 2004 and July 2005, 250 patients underwent laparoscopic TEP inguinal repair using either lightweight (Ultrapro®, 30 g/m2) or heavyweight (Prolene®, 100 g/m2) mesh. Follow-up data was obtained using case note review and telephone-based questionnaire. Patients were followed up within the early and late post-operative periods to assess any changes in outcome.

Results

Follow-up information was obtained for 188 (75%) out of 250 patients. There was no difference between lightweight and heavyweight groups in the incidence or severity of pain/discomfort at mean 4 and 15 months follow-up. There was significantly less interference with physical activity at short and long term follow-up in the lightweight group, in particular lifting (9% vs 21% at mean 4 months, Mann–Whitney U, P = 0.024), walking (1% vs 11% at mean 15 months, Mann–Whitney U, P = 0.006) and vigorous activities (7% vs 19% at mean 15 months, Mann–Whitney-U, P = 0.012). There was no significant difference in awareness of mesh or stiffness in the groin.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair with a lightweight mesh improves functional outcome in the short and long term. There was significantly less interference with all aspects of physical activity with the lightweight mesh. Pain in both groups was very mild, highlighting the benefits of laparoscopic surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hair A, Duffy K, McLean J et al (2000) Groin hernia repair in Scotland. Br J Surg 87:1722–1726

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kingsnorth A, LeBlanc K (2003) Hernias: inguinal and incisional. Lancet 362(9395):1561–1571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2004) Guidance on the use of laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia. Technological appraisal guidance no. 83. NICE, London

    Google Scholar 

  4. MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group (1999) Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernia: a randomised comparison. Lancet 354:185–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. EU Hernia Trialist Collaboration (2002) Laparoscopic versus open groin hernia repair: meta-analysis of randomised trials based on individual patient data. Hernia 6:2–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cobb WS, Kercher KW, Heniford BT (2005) The argument for lightweight polypropylene mesh in hernia repair. Surg Innov 12:63–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Junge K, Rosch R, Krones CJ, Klinge U, Mertens PR, Lynen P, Schumpelick V, Klosterhalfen B (2005) Influence of polyglecaprone 25 (Monocryl) supplementation on the biocompatibility of a polypropylene mesh for hernia repair. Hernia 9:212–217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Khan LR, Kumar S, Nixon SJ (2006) Early results for new lightweight mesh in laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 10:303–308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Post S, Weiss B, Willer M, Neufang T, Lorenz D (2004) Randomized clinical trial of lightweight composite mesh for lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 91:44–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. O’Dwyer PJ, Kingsnorth AN, Molloy RG, Small PK, Lammers B, Horeyseck G (2005) Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 92:166–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Champault G, Barrat C (2005) Inguinal hernia repair with beta glucan-coated mesh: results at two-year follow up. Hernia 9:125–130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bringman S, Wollert S, Osterberg J, Heikkinen T (2005) Early results of a randomized multicenter trial comparing Prolene and VyproII mesh in bilateral endoscopic extraperitoneal hernioplast (TEP). Surg Endosc 19:536–540

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nixon SJ, Kumar S (2005) The totally extraperitoneal approach (TEP) to inguinal hernia repair. Surgeon 3:281–7, 305

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item-short-form health survey (SF36). 1. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kurzer M, Kark AE, Hussain T (2008) Hernia repair: outcomes other than recurrence should be analysed. BMJ 336:1033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Koch A, Bringman S, Myrelid P, Smeds S, Kald A (2008) Randomized clinical trial of groin hernia repair with titanium-coated lightweight mesh compared with standard polypropylene mesh. Br J Surg 95:1226–1231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Agarwal BB, Agarwal KA, Mahajan KC (2009) Prospective double-blind randomized controlled study comparing heavy- and lightweight polypropylene mesh in totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: early results. Surg Endosc 23: 242–247

    Google Scholar 

  18. Heikkinen T, Wollert S, Osterberg J, Smedberg S, Bringman S (2006) Early results of a randomised trial comparing Prolene and VyproII-mesh in endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP) of recurrent unilateral hernias. Hernia 10:34–40

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kumar S, Wilson RG, Nixon SJ, Macintyre IMC (2002) Chronic pain after laparoscopic and open mesh repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg 89:1476–1479

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Courtney CA, Duffy K, Serpell MG, O’Dwyer PJ (2002) Outcome of patients with severe chronic pain following repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg 89:1310–1314

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Langenbach MR, Schmidt J, Ubrig B, Zirngibl H (2008) Sixty-month follow-up after endoscopic inguinal hernia repair with three types of mesh: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 22:1790–1797

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bringman S, Wollert S, Osterberg J, Smedberg S, Granlund H, Heikkinen TJ (2006) Three-year results of a randomized clinical trial of lightweight or standard polypropylene mesh in lichtenstein repair of primary inguinal hernia. Br J Surg 93:1056–1059

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Grant AM, Scott NW (2004) MRC laparoscopic groin hernia trial group. Five-year follow-up of a randomized trial to assess pain and numbness after laparoscopic or open repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg 91:1570–1574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Champault G, Bernard C, Rizk N, Polliand C (2007) Inguinal hernia repair: the choice of prosthesis outweighs that of technique. Hernia 11:125–128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Beattie GC, Kumar S, Nixon SJ (2000) Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair: mesh fixation is unnecessary. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 10:71–73

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical and Surgical Sciences (Surgery), Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, University of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, UK

    L. R. Khan, S. Liong, A. C. de Beaux, S. Kumar & S. J. Nixon

Authors
  1. L. R. Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Liong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. C. de Beaux
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. S. J. Nixon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. R. Khan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khan, L.R., Liong, S., de Beaux, A.C. et al. Lightweight mesh improves functional outcome in laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal inguinal hernia repair. Hernia 14, 39–45 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-009-0558-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-009-0558-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation