Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Understanding the Interaction of Rural People with Ecosystems: A Case Study in a Tropical Dry Forest of Mexico

  • Published:
Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to help understand the interaction of rural people with tropical dry forests. It was based on social research conducted in the Chamela-Cuixmala region, on the Pacific coast of Mexico. The analytical tools used in the study included stakeholder identification, environmental history and social perceptions. The two main social groups in the study were ejidatarios, who own most of the territory, and avecindados, who possess no land but have high population numbers. Through an interpretative methodological approach we documented the vision and meaning that rural people give to their natural and social worlds. The agricultural development model promoted by the Mexican government for decades was identified as the main driver of ecosystem transformation. Rural people, who arrived recently in the region, were proud of the pasture-lands that were transformed from tropical forests. Conservation policies implemented during the last two decades were viewed as impositions although people recognized the value of services provided by ecosystems. This case study has helped to unravel the main dimensions of the human system and how it relates to structures of signification. The social panorama unveiled can be used as an initial basis to promote further research on the social-ecological system of the Chamela-Cuixmala region and to develop future participatory management schemes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcorn JB, Toledo VM. 1998. Resilient resource management in Mexico’s forest ecosystems: the contribution of property rights. In: Berkes F, Folke C, Eds. Linking social and ecological systems. Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. p 216–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Arizpe L, Paz F, Velázquez. M. 1993 Cultura y cambio global: percepciones sociales sobre la deforestación en la selva Lacandona. México DF (México): Centro Regional de Investigaciones Multidisciplinarias UNAM, Grupo Editorial Miguel Angel Porrúa

  • Batisse M. 1982. The biosphere reserve: a tool for environmental conservation and management. Environ Conserv 9(2):101–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Folke C, Eds. 1998. Linking social and ecological systems. Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown K. 2003. Integrating conservation and development: a case of institutional misfit. Front Ecol Environ 1(9):479–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgos A, Maass M. 2004. Vegetation change associated with land-use in Tropical Dry Forest areas of Western Mexico. Agroecosystems 19:475–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceballos G, García A. 1995. Conserving neotropical biodiversity: the role of dry forests in western Mexico. Conserv Biol 9(6):1349–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceballos G, Székely A, García A, Rodríguez P, Noguera F. 1999. Programa de manejo de la Reserva de la Biosfera Chamela-Cuixmala. México DF (México): Instituto Nacional de Ecología, SEMARNAP

  • Challenger A. 1998. Utilización y conservación de los ecosistemas terrestres de México. Pasado, presente y futuro. México DF (México): CONABIO, UNAM, Sierra Madre

  • Congreso Constituyente. 1917. Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos (vigente en 2004). (http://www.senado.gob.mx)

  • Dachary AC, Arnaiz SM. 2001. El turismo y el desarrollo sostenible en el Caribe Hispano y Centroamérica. In: Arnaiz SM, Fernández JS, Dachary AC. (Eds). Desarrollo sustentable y turismo. Guadalajara (México): Universidad de Guadalajara. p 43–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily GC Ed. 1997. Nature’s services. Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington DC (WA): Island Press

    Google Scholar 

  • De Ita C. 1983. Patrones de producción agrícola en un ecosistema tropical estacional en la costa de Jalisco. [dissertation]. México DF (México): Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. 87

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. 2000. Introduction. The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, Eds. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications. p 1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Descola P, Pálsson G. 2002. Nature and Society Anthropological perspectives. London (UK): Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Endter-Wada J, Blahna D, Krannich R, Brunson M. 1998. A framework for understanding social science contributions to ecosystem management. Ecol Appl 8:891–904

    Google Scholar 

  • Esteva J, Marquez D, Cipirano H. 2002. Ambiente y ciudadanía en la región de Pátzcuaro, explorando el futuro. Des/Encuentros 2(5):36–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontana A, Frey JH. 2000. The interview: from structured questions to negotiated text. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Eds. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications. p 645–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentry AH. 1995. Diversity and floristic composition of neotropical dry forests. In: Bullock SH, Mooney HA, Medina E. Eds. Seasonally dry tropical forests. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press. p 146–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerez FP. 1998. Aprendizaje de dos estrategias aparentemente contradictorias hacia los bosques: manejo forestal y protección de la biodiversidad. Foro Intergeneracional del Programa de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable (LEAD-Mex) Colegio de México

  • Godinez C. 2003. Percepciones del sector turismo sobre el ambiente, los servicios ecosistémicos y las instituciones relacionadas con la conservación del ecosistema de selva baja caducifolia en la costa sur de Jalisco. [dissertation]. Morelia (México): Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. 117 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimble R, Chan MK. 1995. Stakeholder analysis for natural resource management in developing countries. Nat Resour Forum 19(2):113–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson LH, Holling CS, Light SS Eds. 1995. Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS. 1995. What barriers? What bridges? In: Gunderson LH, Holling CS, Light SS Eds. Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press. p 3–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS. 1998. Two cultures of ecology. Conserv Ecol 2(2):4. (http://www.consecol.org/Journal/)

    Google Scholar 

  • INEGI 2001. Principales resultados por localidad, Estados Unidos Mexicanos. XII Censo de Población y Vivienda 2000. Aguascalientes (México): INEGI

    Google Scholar 

  • Lara G, Taboada M Eds. 1996. Historias de mis abuelos. México DF (México): Desarrollo Educativo y Cultural Costa Alegre, A.C

  • Lazos E, Paré L. 2000. Miradas indígenas sobre una naturaleza “entristecida”: percepciones del deterioro ambiental entre nahuas del sur de Veracruz. México DF (México): UNAM, Plaza Valdés Editores

    Google Scholar 

  • Maass JM. 1995. Conversion of tropical dry forest to pasture and agriculture. In: Bullock SH, Money H, Medina E Eds. Seasonally dry tropical forests. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press. p 399–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Maass JM, Jaramillo V, Martínez-Yrízar A, García-Oliva F, Sarukhán J. 1994. The Chamela Watershed Project. A study of the structure and functioning of a tropical deciduous forest in west Mexico. (leaflet)

  • Maass JM, Jaramillo V, Martínez-Yrízar A, García-Oliva F, Pérez Jiménez A, Sarukhán J. 2002. Aspectos funcionales del ecosistema de selva baja caducifolia en Chamela, Jalisco. In: Noguera F, Vega-Rivera JH, García Aldrete AN, Quezada Avendaño M. Eds. Historia Natural de Chamela. México DF (México): Instituto de Biología UNAM. pp 525–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Magaña MA. 2003. Actitudes y percepciones de productores rurales y sus familias hacia la conservación de la selva y el área natural protegida: Reserva de la Biosfera Chamela-Cuixmala, Jalisco, México [dissertation]. Morelia (México): Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo. 217 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez L. 2003. Percepciones sociales sobre los servicios ecosistémicos en dos comunidades aledañas a la Reserva de la Biosfera Chamela-Cuixmala, Jalisco [dissertation]. Morelia (México): Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo. 174 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy PG, Lugo AE. 1995. Dry forests of Central America and the Caribbean islands. In: Bullock SH, Mooney HA, Medina E Eds. Seasonally dry tropical forests. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. pp 9–34

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill RV. 2001. Is it time to bury the ecosystem concept? (with full military honors of course). Ecology 82:3275–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Noguera F, Vega Rivera JH, Aldrete García AN. 2002. Introducción. In: Noguera FA, Vega Rivera JH, García Aldrete AN, Quesada Avendaño M Eds. Historia natural de Chamela. Instituto de Biología Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. pp xv–xxi

  • Ortega AT. 1995. El desarrollo socioeconómico de Jalisco. Perspectivas de recursos naturales. Revista Universidad de Guadalajara (abril):41–48

  • Pace ML, Groffman PM Eds. 1998. Successes, limitations, and frontiers in ecosystem science. New York (NY): Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty JN, Pimbert MP. 1995. Beyond conservation ideology and the wilderness myth. Nat Resour Forum 19:5–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Pujadas A. 2003. Comunicación y participación social en el Programa de Ordenamiento Ecológico Territorial de la costa de Jalisco y la Reserva de la Biosfera Chamela-Cuixmala [dissertation]. Morelia (México): Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. 285 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarukhán J, Estrada A, Pérez A. 1979. Plan de desarrollo de las estaciones del Instituto de Biología UNAM. Manuscrito inédito. México DF (México): UNAM

  • SEMADES. 1999. Ordenamiento Ecológico de la Región Costa del Estado de Jalisco. Gobierno del Estado de Jalisco (http://www.semades.gob.mx/oe/)

  • Toledo VM. 1996. The ecological consequences of the 1992 agrarian law in Mexico. In: Randall L Ed. Reforming Mexico’s Agrarian Reform. New York: M.E. Sharpe. p 247–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Toledo VM. 1997. Sustainable development at the village community level: a Third World perspective. In: Smith F, Ed. Environmental sustainability: practical global applications. Boca Raton (FL): St Lucie Press. pp 233–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Toledo VM. 2001. Indigenous peoples, biodiversity and. In: Encyclopaedia of Biodiversity. Volume 3. San Diego (CA): Academic Press. p 451–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Toledo VM, Carabias J, Toledo C, González-Pacheco C. 1989. La producción rural en México: alternativas ecológicas. México DF (México): Fundación Universo XXI

  • Trejo I, Dirzo R. 2000. Deforestation of seasonally dry tropical forest: a national and local analysis in Mexico. Biol Conserv 94:133–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warman A. 2001. El campo mexicano en el siglo XX. México DF (México): Fondo de Cultura Económica

  • Westley F, Carpenter SR, Brock WA, Holling CS, Gunderson LH. 2002. Why systems of people and nature are not just social and ecological systems. In: Gunderson LH, Holling CS. Eds. Panarchy Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington DC (WA): Island Press. p 103–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Worster D. 1988. Doing environmental history (Appendix). In: Worster D Ed. The ends of the Earth. Perspectives on modern environmental history. Cambridge University Press, New York. p 289–307

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project received financial support from the Lucille and David Packard Foundation through the project Capacity building in conservation and restoration ecology in Mexico co-ordinated by Dr. José Sarukhán. The Fondo Sectorial SEMARNAT/CONACYT contributed also through the project Management of tropical forests in Mexico (SEMARNAT-2002-C01-0597) co-ordinated by Dr. Miguel Martínez-Ramos. We are most grateful to the rural communities of the Chamela-Cuixmala region who kindly opened their homes and lives for us to learn. We thank very much the anonymous reviewers for their valuable and challenging critique, Dr. Manuel Maass, Dr. Mauricio Quesada and Dr. Kathy Stoner for their fruitful observations, and Heberto Ferreira, Raúl Ahedo and Salvador Araiza for technical support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alicia Castillo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Castillo, A., Magaña, A., Pujadas, A. et al. Understanding the Interaction of Rural People with Ecosystems: A Case Study in a Tropical Dry Forest of Mexico. Ecosystems 8, 630–643 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-005-0127-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-005-0127-1

Keywords

Navigation