Abstract
The aim of this study was to help understand the interaction of rural people with tropical dry forests. It was based on social research conducted in the Chamela-Cuixmala region, on the Pacific coast of Mexico. The analytical tools used in the study included stakeholder identification, environmental history and social perceptions. The two main social groups in the study were ejidatarios, who own most of the territory, and avecindados, who possess no land but have high population numbers. Through an interpretative methodological approach we documented the vision and meaning that rural people give to their natural and social worlds. The agricultural development model promoted by the Mexican government for decades was identified as the main driver of ecosystem transformation. Rural people, who arrived recently in the region, were proud of the pasture-lands that were transformed from tropical forests. Conservation policies implemented during the last two decades were viewed as impositions although people recognized the value of services provided by ecosystems. This case study has helped to unravel the main dimensions of the human system and how it relates to structures of signification. The social panorama unveiled can be used as an initial basis to promote further research on the social-ecological system of the Chamela-Cuixmala region and to develop future participatory management schemes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alcorn JB, Toledo VM. 1998. Resilient resource management in Mexico’s forest ecosystems: the contribution of property rights. In: Berkes F, Folke C, Eds. Linking social and ecological systems. Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. p 216–49
Arizpe L, Paz F, Velázquez. M. 1993 Cultura y cambio global: percepciones sociales sobre la deforestación en la selva Lacandona. México DF (México): Centro Regional de Investigaciones Multidisciplinarias UNAM, Grupo Editorial Miguel Angel Porrúa
Batisse M. 1982. The biosphere reserve: a tool for environmental conservation and management. Environ Conserv 9(2):101–11
Berkes F, Folke C, Eds. 1998. Linking social and ecological systems. Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press
Brown K. 2003. Integrating conservation and development: a case of institutional misfit. Front Ecol Environ 1(9):479–87
Burgos A, Maass M. 2004. Vegetation change associated with land-use in Tropical Dry Forest areas of Western Mexico. Agroecosystems 19:475–481
Ceballos G, García A. 1995. Conserving neotropical biodiversity: the role of dry forests in western Mexico. Conserv Biol 9(6):1349–56
Ceballos G, Székely A, García A, Rodríguez P, Noguera F. 1999. Programa de manejo de la Reserva de la Biosfera Chamela-Cuixmala. México DF (México): Instituto Nacional de Ecología, SEMARNAP
Challenger A. 1998. Utilización y conservación de los ecosistemas terrestres de México. Pasado, presente y futuro. México DF (México): CONABIO, UNAM, Sierra Madre
Congreso Constituyente. 1917. Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos (vigente en 2004). (http://www.senado.gob.mx)
Dachary AC, Arnaiz SM. 2001. El turismo y el desarrollo sostenible en el Caribe Hispano y Centroamérica. In: Arnaiz SM, Fernández JS, Dachary AC. (Eds). Desarrollo sustentable y turismo. Guadalajara (México): Universidad de Guadalajara. p 43–66
Daily GC Ed. 1997. Nature’s services. Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington DC (WA): Island Press
De Ita C. 1983. Patrones de producción agrícola en un ecosistema tropical estacional en la costa de Jalisco. [dissertation]. México DF (México): Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. 87
Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. 2000. Introduction. The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, Eds. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications. p 1–28
Descola P, Pálsson G. 2002. Nature and Society Anthropological perspectives. London (UK): Routledge
Endter-Wada J, Blahna D, Krannich R, Brunson M. 1998. A framework for understanding social science contributions to ecosystem management. Ecol Appl 8:891–904
Esteva J, Marquez D, Cipirano H. 2002. Ambiente y ciudadanía en la región de Pátzcuaro, explorando el futuro. Des/Encuentros 2(5):36–51
Fontana A, Frey JH. 2000. The interview: from structured questions to negotiated text. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Eds. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications. p 645–72
Gentry AH. 1995. Diversity and floristic composition of neotropical dry forests. In: Bullock SH, Mooney HA, Medina E. Eds. Seasonally dry tropical forests. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press. p 146–94
Gerez FP. 1998. Aprendizaje de dos estrategias aparentemente contradictorias hacia los bosques: manejo forestal y protección de la biodiversidad. Foro Intergeneracional del Programa de Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable (LEAD-Mex) Colegio de México
Godinez C. 2003. Percepciones del sector turismo sobre el ambiente, los servicios ecosistémicos y las instituciones relacionadas con la conservación del ecosistema de selva baja caducifolia en la costa sur de Jalisco. [dissertation]. Morelia (México): Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. 117 p
Grimble R, Chan MK. 1995. Stakeholder analysis for natural resource management in developing countries. Nat Resour Forum 19(2):113–24
Gunderson LH, Holling CS, Light SS Eds. 1995. Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press
Holling CS. 1995. What barriers? What bridges? In: Gunderson LH, Holling CS, Light SS Eds. Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press. p 3–34
Holling CS. 1998. Two cultures of ecology. Conserv Ecol 2(2):4. (http://www.consecol.org/Journal/)
INEGI 2001. Principales resultados por localidad, Estados Unidos Mexicanos. XII Censo de Población y Vivienda 2000. Aguascalientes (México): INEGI
Lara G, Taboada M Eds. 1996. Historias de mis abuelos. México DF (México): Desarrollo Educativo y Cultural Costa Alegre, A.C
Lazos E, Paré L. 2000. Miradas indígenas sobre una naturaleza “entristecida”: percepciones del deterioro ambiental entre nahuas del sur de Veracruz. México DF (México): UNAM, Plaza Valdés Editores
Maass JM. 1995. Conversion of tropical dry forest to pasture and agriculture. In: Bullock SH, Money H, Medina E Eds. Seasonally dry tropical forests. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press. p 399–422
Maass JM, Jaramillo V, Martínez-Yrízar A, García-Oliva F, Sarukhán J. 1994. The Chamela Watershed Project. A study of the structure and functioning of a tropical deciduous forest in west Mexico. (leaflet)
Maass JM, Jaramillo V, Martínez-Yrízar A, García-Oliva F, Pérez Jiménez A, Sarukhán J. 2002. Aspectos funcionales del ecosistema de selva baja caducifolia en Chamela, Jalisco. In: Noguera F, Vega-Rivera JH, García Aldrete AN, Quezada Avendaño M. Eds. Historia Natural de Chamela. México DF (México): Instituto de Biología UNAM. pp 525–42
Magaña MA. 2003. Actitudes y percepciones de productores rurales y sus familias hacia la conservación de la selva y el área natural protegida: Reserva de la Biosfera Chamela-Cuixmala, Jalisco, México [dissertation]. Morelia (México): Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo. 217 p
Martínez L. 2003. Percepciones sociales sobre los servicios ecosistémicos en dos comunidades aledañas a la Reserva de la Biosfera Chamela-Cuixmala, Jalisco [dissertation]. Morelia (México): Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo. 174 p
Murphy PG, Lugo AE. 1995. Dry forests of Central America and the Caribbean islands. In: Bullock SH, Mooney HA, Medina E Eds. Seasonally dry tropical forests. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. pp 9–34
O’Neill RV. 2001. Is it time to bury the ecosystem concept? (with full military honors of course). Ecology 82:3275–84
Noguera F, Vega Rivera JH, Aldrete García AN. 2002. Introducción. In: Noguera FA, Vega Rivera JH, García Aldrete AN, Quesada Avendaño M Eds. Historia natural de Chamela. Instituto de Biología Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. pp xv–xxi
Ortega AT. 1995. El desarrollo socioeconómico de Jalisco. Perspectivas de recursos naturales. Revista Universidad de Guadalajara (abril):41–48
Pace ML, Groffman PM Eds. 1998. Successes, limitations, and frontiers in ecosystem science. New York (NY): Springer
Pretty JN, Pimbert MP. 1995. Beyond conservation ideology and the wilderness myth. Nat Resour Forum 19:5–14
Pujadas A. 2003. Comunicación y participación social en el Programa de Ordenamiento Ecológico Territorial de la costa de Jalisco y la Reserva de la Biosfera Chamela-Cuixmala [dissertation]. Morelia (México): Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. 285 p
Sarukhán J, Estrada A, Pérez A. 1979. Plan de desarrollo de las estaciones del Instituto de Biología UNAM. Manuscrito inédito. México DF (México): UNAM
SEMADES. 1999. Ordenamiento Ecológico de la Región Costa del Estado de Jalisco. Gobierno del Estado de Jalisco (http://www.semades.gob.mx/oe/)
Toledo VM. 1996. The ecological consequences of the 1992 agrarian law in Mexico. In: Randall L Ed. Reforming Mexico’s Agrarian Reform. New York: M.E. Sharpe. p 247–60
Toledo VM. 1997. Sustainable development at the village community level: a Third World perspective. In: Smith F, Ed. Environmental sustainability: practical global applications. Boca Raton (FL): St Lucie Press. pp 233–50
Toledo VM. 2001. Indigenous peoples, biodiversity and. In: Encyclopaedia of Biodiversity. Volume 3. San Diego (CA): Academic Press. p 451–63
Toledo VM, Carabias J, Toledo C, González-Pacheco C. 1989. La producción rural en México: alternativas ecológicas. México DF (México): Fundación Universo XXI
Trejo I, Dirzo R. 2000. Deforestation of seasonally dry tropical forest: a national and local analysis in Mexico. Biol Conserv 94:133–42
Warman A. 2001. El campo mexicano en el siglo XX. México DF (México): Fondo de Cultura Económica
Westley F, Carpenter SR, Brock WA, Holling CS, Gunderson LH. 2002. Why systems of people and nature are not just social and ecological systems. In: Gunderson LH, Holling CS. Eds. Panarchy Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington DC (WA): Island Press. p 103–19
Worster D. 1988. Doing environmental history (Appendix). In: Worster D Ed. The ends of the Earth. Perspectives on modern environmental history. Cambridge University Press, New York. p 289–307
Acknowledgements
This project received financial support from the Lucille and David Packard Foundation through the project Capacity building in conservation and restoration ecology in Mexico co-ordinated by Dr. José Sarukhán. The Fondo Sectorial SEMARNAT/CONACYT contributed also through the project Management of tropical forests in Mexico (SEMARNAT-2002-C01-0597) co-ordinated by Dr. Miguel Martínez-Ramos. We are most grateful to the rural communities of the Chamela-Cuixmala region who kindly opened their homes and lives for us to learn. We thank very much the anonymous reviewers for their valuable and challenging critique, Dr. Manuel Maass, Dr. Mauricio Quesada and Dr. Kathy Stoner for their fruitful observations, and Heberto Ferreira, Raúl Ahedo and Salvador Araiza for technical support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Castillo, A., Magaña, A., Pujadas, A. et al. Understanding the Interaction of Rural People with Ecosystems: A Case Study in a Tropical Dry Forest of Mexico. Ecosystems 8, 630–643 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-005-0127-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-005-0127-1