Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Immediate versus delayed aggressive physical therapy following buccal fat pad interposition in oral submucous fibrosis—a prospective study in Central India

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Oral submucous fibrosis is a disease of an Indian subcontinent with obscure aetiology and poorly treated with varying signs and symptoms. OSMF occurs at any age but is most commonly seen in teenagers and adults in the age ranging between 16 and 35 years. A number of surgical treatments have been used for the treatment of oral submucous fibrosis with unpredictable results.

Patients and method

In this study, 220 patients were randomly divided into two groups with mouth opening less than 16 mm and evaluated with immediate and delayed aggressive physiotherapy with buccal fat pad interposition after fibrotomy. Group A (n = 110) patients underwent aggressive mouth opening exercise from the next postoperative day while in group B (n = 110), patients underwent physiotherapy 7th day postoperatively. Pain and discomfort, mucosalization, infection, flap dehiscence and necrosis were noted. Patients were followed for 1 year on a regular interval basis.

Results

At the end of 1-year follow up, the post-operative mean mouth opening in group A was 38.63 mm and 34.19 mm in group B. In group A, the immediate physiotherapy results in mild to moderate pain and discomfort to the patients as compared to no apparent pain in the group B. The mean mucosalization time in group A and group B was 4.2 and 5.1 weeks, respectively. Postoperatively, all patients achieve satisfactory mouth opening.

Conclusion

Immediate aggressive physiotherapy yields a comparatively superior result than delayed physiotherapy with respect to mouth opening in 1 year of follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Graph 1
Graph 2
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Graph 3
Graph 4
Graph 5
Fig. 4
Graph 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sirsat SM, Khanolkar VR (1962) Submucous fibrosis of the palate and pillars of the fauces. J Med Science 16:189–197

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gupta D, Sharma SC (1988) Oral submucous fibrosis – a new treatment regimen. J Oral MaxillofacSurg 46:830–833

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Joshi SG (1953) Submucous fibrosis of the palate and pillars. Indian Journal of otolaryngeal 4:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  4. Paymaster JC (1956) Cancer of the buccal mucosa: clinical study of 650 cases in Indian patients. Cancer 9:431–435

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Borle RM, Borle SR (1991) Management of oral submucous fibrosis. J Oral MaxillofacSurg 49:788–791

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lambade P, Dawane P, Thorat P (2014) Oral submucous fibrosis— a treatment protocol based on clinical study of 100 patients in Central India. J Oral MaxillofacSurg. doi:10.1007/s10006-014-0478-x

    Google Scholar 

  7. Khanna JN, Andrade NN (1995) Oral submucous fibrosis: a new concept in surgical management. Report of 100 cases. Int J Oral MaxillofacSurg 24:433–439

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bande CR et al (2012) Extended nasolabial flap compared with the platysmamyocutaneous muscle flap for reconstruction of intraoral defects after release of oral submucous fibrosis: a comparative study. Br J Oral MaxillofacSurg. doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2012.02.015

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wei FC, Chang YM, Kildal M, Tsang WS, Chen HC (2001) Bilateral small radial forearm flaps for the reconstruction of buccal mucosa after surgical release of submucosal fibrosis: a new reliable approach. PlastReconstrSurg 107:1679–1683

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Scammon RE (1919) On the development and finer structure of the corpus adiposumbuccae. Anat Rec 15:267–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Egyedi P (1977) Utilisation of the buccal fat pad for closure of oro-antral and/or oro-nasal communications. J CraniomaxillofacSurg 5:241–244

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dubien B, Jackson IT, Halim A, Ferreira M (1989) Anatomy of the buccal fat pad and its clinical significance. Plast Reconstr Surg 257–63

  13. Lambade P, Meshram V, Thorat P, Dawane P, Thorat A, Rajkhokar D (2016) Efficacy of nasolabial flap in reconstruction of fibrotomy defect in surgical management of oral submucous fibrosis: a prospective study. Oral MaxillofacSurg. doi:10.1007/s10006015-0519-0

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lambade P, Dawane P, Thorat A (2016) Efficacy of buccal fat pad in the surgical management of oral submucous fibrosis: a prospective study. Oral MaxillofacSurg. doi:10.1007/s10006-016-0546-5

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tideman H, Bosanquet A, Scott J (1986) Use of the buccal fat pad as a pedicled graft. J Oral MaxillofacSurg 44:435–440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fujimura N, Nagura H, Enomoto S (1990) Grafting of the buccal fat pad into palatal defects. J CraniomaxillofacSurg 18:219–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Amin MA, Bailey BM, Swinson B, Witherow H (2005) Use of the buccal fat pad in the reconstruction and prosthetic rehabilitation of oncological maxillary defects. Br J Oral MaxillofacSurg 43:148–154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chandrashekhar Bande.

Ethics declarations

This study obtained approval from an institutional ethical committee.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding source

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bande, C., Dawane, P., Gupta, M.K. et al. Immediate versus delayed aggressive physical therapy following buccal fat pad interposition in oral submucous fibrosis—a prospective study in Central India. Oral Maxillofac Surg 20, 397–403 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-016-0580-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-016-0580-3

Keywords

Navigation