Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Molecular dynamics simulation of CL20/DNDAP cocrystal-based PBXs

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Molecular Modeling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Context

CL-20/DNDAP cocrystal is a promising new type of explosive with exceptional energy density and detonation parameters. However, compared to TATB, FOX-7 and other insensitive explosives, it still has higher sensitivity. In order to decrease the sensitivity of CL20/DNDAP cocrystal explosive, in this article, a CL20/DNDAP cocrystal model was established, and six different types of polymers, including butadiene rubber (BR), ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA), polyethylene glycol (PEG), hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene (HTPB), fluoropolymer (F2603), and polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF), were added to the three cleaved surfaces of (1 0 0), (0 1 0) and (0 0 1) to obtain polymer-bonded explosives (PBXs). Predict the effects of different polymers on the stability, trigger bond length, mechanical properties, and detonation performance of PBXs. Among the six PBX models, CL-20/DNDAP/PEG model exhibited the highest binding energy and the lowest trigger bond length, indicating that CL-20/DNDAP/PEG model had the best stability, compatibility, and the least sensitivity. Furthermore, although the CL-20/DNDAP/F2603 model demonstrated superior detonation capabilities, it should be noted that this model displayed low levels of compatibility. Overall, CL-20/DNDAP/PEG model exhibited the superior comprehensive properties, thereby demonstrating that PEG is a more suitable binder option for PBXs based on the CL20/DNDAP cocrystal.

Methods

The properties of CL-20/DNDAP cocrystal-based PBXs were predicted by molecular dynamics (MD) method under Materials Studio software. The MD simulation time step was set at 1fs and the total MD simulation time was 2ns. The Isothermal-isobaric (NPT) ensemble was used for the 2ns of MD simulation. The COMPASS force field was used, and the temperature was set at 295K.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Bolton O, Matzger AJ (2011) Improved compatibility and smart material functionality realized in an energetic cocrystal. Angew Chem Int Ed 38:8960–8963

    Google Scholar 

  2. Millar DIA, Maynard-Casely HE, Allan DR, Cumming AS, Lennie AR, Mackay AJ, Oswald IDH, Tang CC, Pulham CR (2012) Crystal engineering of energetic materials: co-crystals of CL-20. Crys Eng Commun 10:3742–3749

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yang ZW, Li HZ, Huang H, Zhou XQ, Li JS, Nie FD (2013) Preparation and performance of a HNIW/TNTcocrystal explosive. Propellants Explos Pyrotech 4:495–501

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guo CY, Zhang HB, Wang XC, Xu JJ, Liu Y, Liu XF, Huang H, Sun J (2013) Crystal structure and explosive performance of a new CL-20/caprolactam cocrystal. J Mol Struct 1048:267–273

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stahly GP (2009) A survey of cocrystals reported prior to 2000. Crystal Growth Design 10:4212–4229

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yan QL, Zeman S, Elbeih A (2012) Recent advances in thermal analysis and stability evaluation of i nsensitive plastic bonded explosives (PBXs). Thermochim Acta 537:1–12

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yu R, Chen S, Lan G, Li J, Wei C, Jin S (2019) Thermal hazards evaluation of insensitive JEOL-1 polymer bonded explosive. Materials Express 9:596–603

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yan QL, Zeman S, Sánchez Jiménez PE, Zhang TL, Pérez Maqueda LA, Elbeih A (2014) The mitigation effect of synthetic polymers on initiation reactivity of CL-20: physical models and chemical pathways of thermolysis. J Phys Chem C 118:22881–22895

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang P, Guo XY, Zhang JY, Jiao QJ (2014) Application of liquid paraffin in castable CL-20 based PBX. J Energetic Mat 32:278–292

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang Z, Li J, Huang B, Liu S, Huang Z, Nie F (2014) Preparation and properties study of core-shell CL-20/TATB composites. Propellants Explosives Pyrotechnics 39:51–58

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaur J, Arya VP, Kaur G, Lata P (2013) Evaluation of the thermo-mechanical and explosive properties of bimodal and hybrid polymer bonded explosive (PBX) compositions based on HNS and HMX. Cent Eur J Energ Mater 10:371–392

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sun T, Liu Q, Xiao J, Zhao F, Xiao H (2014) Molecular dynamics simulation of interface interactions and mechanical properties of CL-20/HMX cocrystal and its based PBXs. Acta Chimica Sinica 9:1036

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zeng C, Yang Z, Liu J, Ding L, Hao S, Gong F, Yang Z (2023) Study on mechanical improvement of CL-20 energetic co-crystals based PBX by surface modification. Propellants Explosives Pyrotechnics 4:e202200154

    Google Scholar 

  14. Li Y, Yang Z, Ding L, Pan L, Zhang J, Zheng X, Lin C (2019) Feasible self-healing CL-20 based PBX: employing a novel polyurethane-urea containing disulfide bonds as polymer binder. React Funct Polym 144:104342

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Deng X, Wang B (2020) Peridynamic modeling of dynamic damage of polymer bonded explosive. Comput Mater Sci 173:109405

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Li X, Zhang X, Yang W, Song C, Sun H, Wang J (2019) Design and characterization of a cook-off resistant high-energy booster explosive based on CL-20/FOX-7. Propellants Explosives Pyrotechnics 44:550–556

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Elia T, Baudin G, Genetier M, Lefrançois A, Osmont A, Catoire L (2019) Shock to detonation transition of plastic bonded aluminized explosives. Propellants Explosives Pyrotechnics 45:554–567

    Google Scholar 

  18. Li S, Xiao J (2021) Molecular dynamics simulations for effects of fluoropolymer binder content in CL-20/TNT based polymer-bonded explosives. Molecules 16:4876

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hang GY, Wang T, Wang JT, Yu WL, Shen HM (2022) Theoretical research on performances of CL-20/HMX cocrystal explosive and its based polymer bonded explosives (PBXs) by molecular dynamics method. Journal of Molecular Modeling 12:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wang XJ, Xiao JJ (2017) Molecular dynamics simulation studies of the ε-CL-20/HMX co-crystal-based PBXs with HTPB. Structural Chemistry 28:1645–1651

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang Z, Ding L, Wu P, Liu Y, Nie F, Huang F (2015) Fabrication of RDX, HMX and CL-20 based microcapsules via in situ polymerization of melamine–formaldehyde resins with reduced sensitivity. Chemical Engineering Journal 268:60–66

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nair UR, Sivabalan R, Gore GM, Geetha M, Asthana SN, Singh H (2005) Hexanitrohexaazai- sowurtzitane(CL-20) and CL-20-based formulations. Combustion Explosion and Shock Waves 41:121–132

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sikder AK, Sikder N (2004) A review of advanced high performance, insensitive and thermally stable energetic materials emerging for military and space applications. J Hazard Mater 1:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tartakovsky V A, Ermakov A S, Sigai N V, Varfolomeeva ON (2000) Synthesis of N,N′-dialkylme-thylenebis (nitramines) from N-alkylsulfamates. Russian Chemical Bulletin 6: 1079–1081

  25. Liu N, Duan B, Lu X, Mo H, Xu M, Zhang Q, Wang B (2018) Preparation of CL-20/DNDAP cocrystals by a rapid and continuous spray drying method: an alternative to cocrystal formation. Cryst Eng Comm 14:2060–2067

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sun H, Ren PJ, Fried R (1998) The COMPASS force field: parameterization and validation for phosphazenes. Comput Theor Polym Sci 8:229–246

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bunte SW, Sun H (2000) Molecular modeling of EMs: the parameterization and validation of nitrate esters in the COMPASS forcefield. J Chem Chem B 104:2477–2489

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Michael JM, Sun H, Rigby D (2004) Development and validation of COMPASS force field parameters for molecules with aliphatic azide chains. J Comput Chem 25:61–71

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sun T, Xiao JJ, Liu Q, Zhao F, Xiao HM (2014) Comparative study on structure, energetic and mechanical properties ofε-CL-20/HMX cocrystal and its composite with molecular dynamics simulations. J Mater Chem A 2:13898–13904

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Xu XJ, Xiao HM, Xiao JJ, Zhu W, Huang H, Li JS (2006) Molecular dynamics simulations for pure ε-CL-20 and ε-CL-20-based PBXs. J Phys Chem B 14:7203–7207

    Google Scholar 

  31. Andersen HC (1980) Molecular dynamics simulations at constant pressure and/or temperature. J Chem Phys 72:2384–2393

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Parrinello M, Rahman A (1981) Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: a new molecular dynamics method. J Appl Phys 52:7182–7190

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ewald PP (1921) Evaluation of optical and electrostatic lattice potentials. Ann Phys 64:253–287

    Google Scholar 

  34. Allen MP, Tildesley DJ (1987) Computer simulation of liquids. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  35. Allen MP, Tildesley DJ (1989) Computer simulation of liquids. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  36. Xu XJ, Xiao HM, Ju XH, Gong XD (2005) Theoretical study on pyrolysis mechanism for ε-hexanitrohexaazaisowurtzitane. Chin J Org Chem 25:536–539

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Geetha M, Nair UR, Sarwade DB, Gore GM, Asthana SN, Singh H (2003) Studies on CL-20: the most powerful high energy material. J Therm Anal Calorim 73:913–922

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Yang J, Zhang X, Gao P, Gong X, Wang G (2014) Molecular dynamics and dissipative particle dynamics simulations of the miscibility and mechanical properties of GAP/DIANP blending systems. RSC Adv 79:41934–41941

    Google Scholar 

  39. Pettifor DG (1992) Theoretical predictions of structure and related properties of intermetallics. Mater Sci Technol 4:345–349

    Google Scholar 

  40. Parrinello M, Rahman A (1982) Strain fluctuations and elastic constants. J Chem Phys 5:2662–2666

    Google Scholar 

  41. Watt JP, Davies GF, O’Connell RJ (1976) The elastic properties of composite materials. Rev Geophys 4:541–563

    Google Scholar 

  42. Guo YX, Zhang HS (1983) Nitrogen equivalent coefficient and revised nitrogen equivalent coefficient equations for calculating detonation properties of explosives: detonation velocity of explosives. Explos Shock Waves 3:56–66

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hang GY, Wang JT, Wang T, Shen HM, Yu WL (2022) Theoretical investigations on stability, sensitivity, energetic performance, and mechanical properties of CL-20/TNAD cocrystal explosive by molecular dynamics method. J Mol Model 28:58

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Miao S, Wang T, Wang YL, Hang GY, Qi CB, Lu CB (2019) Theoretical calculation of the effect of crystal defects on properties of HMX-based PBX. Chin J Energ Mater 27:636–643

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Guo ZW, Hao GZ, Hu YB, Feng XJ, Yang JQ, Jiang W (2023) Molecular dynamics simulation on the effects of vacancy defects on the sensitivity, mechanical properties and detonation performance of TKX⁃50. Chin J Energ Mater 3:277–285

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Environmental and Safety Engineering, North University of China, Taiyuan, 030051, China

    Jian-sen Mao, Bao-guo Wang, Ya-fang Chen, Xing Tian & Bao-yun Ye

  2. School of Mechatronical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China

    Jian-bo Fu

Authors
  1. Jian-sen Mao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bao-guo Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ya-fang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jian-bo Fu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xing Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Bao-yun Ye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Jian-sen Mao: completed the whole simulation work and wrote the original draft

Bao-guo Wang: investigation, and provided the article's conception and feasibility analysis

Ya-fang Chen: conceptualization, and data curation

Jian-bo Fu: provided suggestions and helped revise the manuscript

Xing Tian: visualization, and validation

Bao-yun Ye: provided help with the software

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bao-guo Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This article does not present research with ethical considerations.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mao, Js., Wang, Bg., Chen, Yf. et al. Molecular dynamics simulation of CL20/DNDAP cocrystal-based PBXs. J Mol Model 29, 199 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-023-05605-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-023-05605-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation