Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Capture of acidic gas molecules in metallic nanopillar array surfaces

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Molecular Modeling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To effectively capture the acidic fluid molecules in industrial exhaust, this study employed molecular dynamics to simulate the dynamic adsorption behavior of a mixture of carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2), hydrogen sulfide (H2S), and water (H2O) molecules in gold (Au) nanoslits. We systematically examined the self-diffusion coefficient (DZ), average adsorption energy (Ea,av), and static adsorption amount (Nsa) of individual ingredients and a mixture of the adsorbates under various temperatures (T), concentrations (c), and array slit widths (d). The simulation results indicate that Au(110) has better capture capabilities with regard to H2O and H2S, followed by CO2 and then finally CO. Among the various slit structures, the design of array structures with slit widths 8.15 × 5.76 Å (case C) resulted in the highest average adsorption energy and static adsorption amount for all of the adsorbates. This is due to the fact that an appropriate slit width can increase the self-diffusion coefficient of the gas molecule and provide more stable adsorption sites to capture the adsorbates. Compared to the smooth surface structure, the nanopillar array structures significantly increased the self-diffusion coefficients and the adsorption energy of specific molecules. The comprehensive molecular model is helpful to predict atomistic-level adsorption behaviors for acidic gas molecules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

All data generated or analyzed during this work are included in this published article.

Code availability

N/A.

References

  1. Jaffey DM, Madix RJ (1991) The adsorption of hydrogen sulfide on clean and sulfided au( 110). Surf. Sci. 258:359–375

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dou Y, Zhiglei LV, Winograd N, Garrison BJ (2001) Explosive boiling of water films adjacent to heated surfaces: a microscopic description. J. Phys. Chem. A 105:2748–2755

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Arsenault RJ, Beeler JR, Esterling DM (1988) Computer simulation in materials science. ASM Materials Science Seminar, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ionescu A, Allouche A, Aycard JP, Rajzmann M (2002) Study of γ-alumina surface reactivity: adsorption of water and hydrogen sulfide on octahedral aluminum sites. J. Phys. Chem. B 106:9359–9366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gottfried JM, Schmidt KJ, Schroeder SLM, Christmann K (2003) Adsorption of carbon monoxide on au(110)-(1×2). J. Phys. Chem. B 107:1266–1267

    Google Scholar 

  6. Diemant T, Bansmann J, Behm RJ (2009) CO oxidation on planar au/TiO2 model catalysts: deactivation and the influence of water. Vacuum 25:193–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Johnny S, Hieu D, Christopher JP, Lars CG, Bert DC (2014) The critical role of water at the gold-titania interface in catalytic CO oxidation. Science 26:1599–1602

    Google Scholar 

  8. Huang PH, Cheng HH, Lin SH (2015) Adsorption of carbon dioxide onto activated carbon prepared from coconut shells. E-Journal of Chemistry 2015:106590–106510

    Google Scholar 

  9. Huang PH, Jhan JW, Cheng YM, Cheng HH (2014) Effects of carbonization parameters of moso bamboo-based porous charcoal on capturing carbon dioxide. Sci. World J. 2014:937867–937868

    Google Scholar 

  10. Huang PH, Hung SC, Huang MY (2014) Molecular dynamics investigations of liquid–vapor interaction and adsorption of formaldehyde, oxocarbons, and water in graphitic slit pores. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16:15289–15298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang PH (2015) Molecular dynamics investigation of separation of hydrogen sulfide from acidic gas mixtures inside metal-doped graphite micropore. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17:22686–22698

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuo JK, Huang PH, Huang TH, Luo JY (2016) Adsorption behaviors of hydrogen sulphide on au(110) nanoslit array surfaces using molecular dynamics simulations. Mol. Simul. 42(17):1429–1436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Levitt M, Hirshberg M, Sharon R, Daggett V (1995) Potential energy function and parameters for simulations of the molecular dynamics of proteins and nucleic acids in solution. Comput. Phys. Commun. 91(1–3):215–231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Levitt M, Hirshberg M, Sharon R, Laidig KE, Daggett V (1997) Calibration and testing of a water model for simulation of the molecular dynamics of proteins and nucleic acids in solution. J. Phys. Chem. B 101:5051–5061

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mayo SL, Olafson BD, Goddard WA (1990) Dreiding: a generic force field for molecular simulations. J. Phys. Chem. 94:8897–8909

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jang SS, Jang YH, Kim YH, Goddard WA, Flood AH, Laursen BW, Tseng HR, Stoddart JF, Jeppesen JO, Choi JW, Steuerman DW, Delonno E, Heath JR (2005) Structures and properties of self-assembled monolayers of bistable [2]rotaxanes on au (111) surfaces from molecular dynamics simulations validated with experiment. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127(5):1563–1575

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kay BD, Lykke KR, Creighton JR, Ward SJ (1989) The influence of adsorbate–absorbate hydrogen bonding in molecular chemisorption: NH3, HF, and H2O on au(111). J. Chem. Phys. 91:5120–5121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Haile JM (1992) Molecular dynamics simulation: elementrary methods. A Wiley- interscience publication, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. USA

  19. Huang PH, Kuo JK, Wu YF (2012) Atomistic simulations of solid-state pressure welding of metallic nanowires. Appl Phys A- Mat Sci Process 109:561–569

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Huang PH (2012) Atomistic simulations of shearing friction and dynamic adhesion of double-walled carbon nanotubes on au substrates. Comp Sci Technol 72:599–607

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology, R.O.C. under grants MOST 108–2221-E-224-034, MOST 109-2221-E-035-001-MY2 and MOST 108–2622-E-224-016-CC3.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Jenn-Kun Kuo: conceptualization, formal analysis, writing. Yu-Ting Tsai: review, drawing, and Editing. Pei-Hsing Huang: supervision and writing. Jheng-Yu Luo: Investigation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pei-Hsing Huang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

► Dynamic adsorption behavior of acidic gas mixtures (H2S, H2O, CO2, and CO) on various types of Au(110) surfaces was investigated using MD simulations.

► The simulations of H2S/H2O/CO2/CO mixtures revealed strong hydrated interactions between H2O/H2S resulting in H2O/H2S can be firmly adsorbed on Au surfaces, forming the first and second monolayers. And then, interactions of mutual tractions between H2S/H2O and CO2/CO can further capture free CO2/CO to cover the outermost layer of H2S/H2O.

► The columnar array structures with a slit width ≧ 5.76 Å allow H2S/H2O/CO2/CO mixtures diffusing into the slits and provide more stable adsorption sites (i.e., with a higher adsorption energy).

► Slit structures presented a level of static adsorption that was 5 to 15% higher than that of smooth surface structure.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuo, JK., Tsai, YT., Huang, PH. et al. Capture of acidic gas molecules in metallic nanopillar array surfaces. J Mol Model 27, 139 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-021-04728-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-021-04728-x

Keywords

Navigation