Skip to main content
Log in

Interactions of acylated methylglucoside derivatives with CO2: simulation and calculations

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Molecular Modeling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Carbohydrates have drawn considerable interest from researchers recently due to their affinity for CO2. However, most of the research in this field has focused on peracetylated derivatives. Compared with acetylated carbohydrates, which have already been studied in depth, methyl d-glucopyranoside derivatives are more stable and could have additional applications. Thus, in the present work, ab initio calculations were performed to elucidate the characteristics of the interactions of methylglucoside derivatives with CO2, and to investigate how the binding energy (ΔE) is affected by isomerization or the introduction of various acyl groups. Four methyl d-glucopyranosides (each with two anomers) bearing acetyl, propionyl, butyryl, and isobutyryl moieties, respectively, were designed as substrates, and the 1:1 complexes of a CO2 molecule with each of these sugar substrates were modeled. The results indicate that ΔE is mainly influenced by interaction distance and the number of negatively charged donors or interacting pairs in the complex; the structure of the acyl group present in the substrate is a secondary influence. Except in the case of methyl 2-O-acetyl-d-glucopyranose, the ΔE values of the α- and β-anomers of each methylglucoside were found to be almost the same. Therefore, we would expect the CO2 affinities of the four derivatives studied here to be as strong as or even stronger than that of peracetylated d-glucopyranose.

The binding energy between methyl d-glucopyranoside derivatives with various substituted acyl groups and CO2 are evaluated by ab initio calculations. The strong interaction between these methyl dglucopyranoside derivatives and CO2 showed the potential of their application for CO2 capture

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Scheme 1
Scheme 2
Scheme 3
Scheme 4
Scheme 5
Scheme 6
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Please note that, in this paper, a “larger” energy is an energy that is larger in magnitude than another energy, and a “smaller” energy is an energy that is smaller in magnitude than another energy. Thus, ΔE of II(a) is larger than ΔE of I(a), even though the ΔE of II(a) is more negative than the ΔE of I(a).

References

  1. Karami D, Mahinpey N (2012) Ind Eng Chem Res 51:4567–4572

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Manzanares M, Fabrega C, Osso JO, Vega LF, Andreu T, Morante JR (2014) Appl Catal B Environ 150–151:57–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Laintz KE, Wai CM, Yonker CR, Smith RD (1991) J Supercrit Fluids 4:194–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kazarian SG, Vincent MF, Bright FV, Liotta CL, Eckert CA (1996) J Am Chem Soc 118:1729–1736

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sarbu T, Styranec T, Beckman EJ (2000) Nature 405:165–168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Donat F, Florin NH, Anthony EJ, Fennell PS (2011) Environ Sci Technol 46:1262–1269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao C, Chen X, Zhao C (2010) Int J Greenh Gas Control 4:655–658

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Raveendran P, Wallen SL (2000) J Am Chem Soc 124:7274–7275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Potluri VK, Xu J, Enick R, Beckman E, Hamilton AD (2002) Org Lett 4:2333–2335

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ma SL, Wu YT, Hurrey ML, Wallen SL, Grant CS (2010) J Phys Chem B 114:3809–3817

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hurrey ML, Wallen SL (2006) Langmuir 22:7324–7330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nunesa AVM, Almeidaa APC, Marquesa SR, Sampaio de Sousa AR, Casimiroc T, Duarte CMM (2010) J Supercrit Fluids 54:357–361

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cummings S, Trickett K, Enick R, Eastoe JL (2011) Phys Chem Chem Phys 13:1276–1289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim KH, Kim Y (2008) J Phys Chem A 112:1596–1603

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Altarsha M, Ingrosso F, Ruiz-Lopez MF (2012) ChemPhysChem 13:3397–3403

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dai HQ, Tri NN, Trang NTT, Trung NT (2014) RSC Adv 4:13901–13908

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang PY, Yang HJ, Xu LX (2013) J Chem Thermodyn 67:234–240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chang HH, Yang CC, Li X, Wei WL, Pang XY, Qiao Y (2014) J Mol Model 20:2259–2268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chang HH, Yang CC, Li X, Gao WC, Wei WL, Liu G, Pang XY, Qiao Y (2015) CR Chim 18:935–944

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Montgomery JA Jr, Vreven T, Kudin KN, Burant JC, Millam JM, Iyengar SS, Tomasi J, Barone V, Mennucci B, Cossi M, Scalmani G, Rega N, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Klene M, Li X, Knox JE, Hratchian HP, Cross JB, Adamo C, Jaramillo J, Gomperts R, Stratmann RE, Yazyev O, Austin AJ, Cammi R, Pomelli C, Ochterski JW, Ayala PY, Morokuma K, Voth GA, Salvador P, Dannenberg JJ, Zakrzewski VG, Dapprich S, Daniels AD, Strain MC, Farkas O, Malick K, Rabuck AD, Raghavachari K, Foresman JB, Ortiz JV, Cui Q, Baboul G, Clifford S, Cioslowski J, Stefanov BB, Liu G, Liashenko A, Piskorz P, Komaromi I, Martin RL, Fox DJ, Keith T, Al-Laham MA, Peng CY, Nanayakkara A, Challacombe M, Gill PMW, Johnson B, Chen W, Wong MW, Gonzalez C, Pople JA (2003) Gaussian 03, revision B.01. Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh

  21. Raveendran P, Wallen SL (2002) J Am Chem Soc 124:12590–12599

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Trung NT, Hung NP, Hue TT, Nguyen MT (2011) Phys Chem Chem Phys 13:14033–14042

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang Y, Hong L, Tapriyal D, Kim IC, Paik IH, Crosthwaite JM, Hamilton AD, Thies MC, Beckman EJ, Enick RM, Johnson JK (2009) J Phys Chem B 113:14971–14980

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from the Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 21106172), and the Natural Science Foundation for Youths of Shanxi (2013021008-7).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to X. Y. Pang or Y. Qiao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, H.H., Cao, R.X., Yang, C.C. et al. Interactions of acylated methylglucoside derivatives with CO2: simulation and calculations. J Mol Model 22, 39 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-015-2903-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-015-2903-y

Keywords

Navigation