Skip to main content
Log in

3D-QSAR study of Chk1 kinase inhibitors based on docking

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Molecular Modeling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1), a kind of a serine/threonine protein kinase, plays a significant role in DNA damage-induced checkpoints. Chk1 inhibitors have been demonstrated to abrogate the S and G2 checkpoints and disrupt the DNA repair process, which results in immature mitotic progression, mitotic catastrophe, and cell death. Normal cells remain at the G1 phase via p53 to repair their DNA damages, and are less influenced by the abrogation of S and G2 checkpoint. Therefore, selective inhibitors of Chk1 may be of great therapeutic value in cancer treatment. In this paper, in order to understand the structure-activity relationship of macro-cyclic urea Chk1 inhibitors, a study combined molecular docking and 3D-QSAR modeling was carried out, which resulted in two substructure-based 3D-QSAR models, including the CoMFA model (r2, 0.873; q2, 0.572) and CoMSIA model (r2, 0.897; q2, 0.599). The detailed microscopic structures of Chk1 binding with inhibitors were performed by molecular docking. Two docking based 3D-QSAR models were developed (CoMFA with r2, 0.887; q2, 0.501; CoMSIA with r2, 0.872; q2, 0.520). The contour maps obtained from the 3D-QSAR models in combination with the docked binding structures would be helpful to better understand the structure–activity relationship. All the conclusions drawn from both the 3D-QSAR contour maps and molecular docking were in accordance with the experimental activity dates. The results suggested that the developed models and the obtained CHk1 inhibitor binding structures might be reliable to predict the activity of new inhibitors and reasonable for the future drug design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen Y, Sanchez Y (2004) Chk1 in the DNA damage response: conserved roles from yeasts to mammals. DNA Repair 3:1025–1032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kastan MB, Onyekwere O, Sidransky D et al (1991) Participation of p53 protein in the cellular response to DNA damage. Cancer Res 51:6304–6311

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Li Q, Zhu GD (2002) Targeting serine/threonine protein kinase B/Akt and cell-cycle checkpoint kinases for treating cancer. Curr Top Med Chem 2:939–971

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Greenblatt MS, Bennett WP, Hollstein M et al (1994) Mutations in the p53 tumor suppressor gene: clues to cancer etiology and molecular pathogenesis. Cancer Res 54:4855–4878

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yolanda S, Calvin W, Richard ST et al (1997) Conservation of the chk1 checkpoint pathway in mammals: linkage of DNA damage to cdk regulation through Cdc25. Science 277:1497–1501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cramer RD, Patterson DE, Bunce JD (1988) Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins. J Am Chem Soc 110:5959–5967

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cramer RD, Bunce JD, Patterson DE et al (1988) Crossvalidation, bootstrapping, and partial least squares compared with multiple regression in conventional QSAR studies. Quant Struct Act Relat 7:18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Klebe G, Abraham U, Mietzner T (1994) Molecular similarity indices in a comparative analysis (CoMSIA) of drug molecules to correlate and predict their biological activity. J Med Chem 37:4130–4146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Potashman MH, Bready J, Coxon A et al (2007) Design, synthesis, and evaluation of orally active benzimidazoles and benzoxazoles as vascular endothelial growth factor-2 receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. J Med Chem 50:4351–4373

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang GF, Lu HT, Xiong Y et al (2006) Understanding the structure activity and structure-selectivity correlation of cyclic guanine derivatives as phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors by molecular docking, CoMFA and CoMSIA analyses. Bioorg Med Chem 14:1462–1473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang X, Xu L, Luo X et al (2002) Elucidating the inhibiting mode of AHPBA derivatives against HIV-1 protease and building predictive 3D-QSAR models. J Med Chem 45:333–343

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Li GQ, Tao ZF, Tong YS (2007) Synthesis and in-vitro biological activity of macro cyclic urea Chk1 inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 17:6499–6504

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang GT, Li GQ (2005) 1-(5-Chloro-2-alkoxyphenyl)-3-(5-cyano- pyrazi-2-yl)ureas as potent and selective inhibitors of Chk1 kinase: synthesis, preliminary SAR, and biological activities. J Med Chem 48:3118–3121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Li GQ, Hasvold LA, Tao ZF (2006) Synthesis and biological evaluation of 1-(2,4,5-trisubstituted phenyl)-3-(5-cyanopyrazin-2-yl)ureas as potent Chk1 kinase inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 16:2293–2298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tao ZF, Wang L, Stewart KD et al (2007) Structure-based design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of potent and selective macrocyclic checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitors. J Med Chem 50:1514–1527

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tao ZF, Chen ZH (2007) Macrocyclic ureas as potent and selective Chk1 inhibitors: an improved synthesis, kinome profiling, structure–activity relationships, and preliminary pharmacokinetics. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 17:6593–6601

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Li GQ, Tao ZF, Tong YS (2007) Synthesis and in-vitro biological activity of macrocyclic urea Chk1 inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 17:6499–6504

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tao ZF, Wang L, Stewart KD et al (2007) Structure-based design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of potent and selective macrocyclic checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitors. J Med Chem 50:1514–1527

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sybyl Version 7.0 (2004) St. Louis (MO), Tripos Associates Inc. http://www.tripos.com

  20. Clark M, Cramer RD III, Opdenbosch NV (1989) Validation of the general purpose tripos 5.2 force field. J Comput Chem 10:982–1012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gasteiger J, Marsili M (1980) Iterative partial equalization of orbital electronegativity- a rapid access to atomic charges. Tetrahedron 36:3219–3228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Morris GM, Goodsell DS, Halliday RS et al (1998) Automated docking using a Lamarckian generic algorithm and empirical binding free energy function. J Comput Chem 19:1639–1662

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Weiner SJ, Kollman PA, Case DA et al (1984) A new force field for molecular mechanical simulation of nucleic acidsand proteins. J Am Chem Soc 106:765–784

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gasteiger J, Marsili M (1980) Iterative partial equalization of orbital electronegativity– a rapid access to atomic charges. Tetrahedron 36:3219–3228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mehler EL, Solmajer T (1991) Electrostatic effects in proteins: comparison of dielectric and charge models. Protein Eng 4:903–910

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bush BL, Nachbar RB (1993) Sample-distance partial least squares: PLS optimized for many variables, with application to CoMFA. J Comput Aided Mol Des 7:587–619

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledged financial support from the Natural Science Foundation of China (NO. 21071021).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huabei Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhao, L., Liu, Y., Hu, S. et al. 3D-QSAR study of Chk1 kinase inhibitors based on docking. J Mol Model 18, 3669–3694 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-012-1363-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-012-1363-x

Keywords

Navigation